Re: [gentoo-user] PAM auto-adding ".db" suffix: feature or bug?

2014-08-23 Thread Jarry
On 24-Aug-14 0:07, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 23/08/2014 21:21, Jarry wrote: Hi Gentoo-users, after playing with PAM for a few days I discovered one strange thing: PAM adds ".db" suffix to database definition on its own! What I mean is following: _ more /etc/pam.d/postfix auth

[gentoo-user] blocker between openrc and procps

2014-08-23 Thread meino . cramer
hi, How can I resolve this blocker: (sys-process/procps-3.3.9::gentoo, installed) pulled in by sys-process/procps required by (dev-db/mysql-5.5.39::gentoo, installed) sys-process/procps required by @system (sys-apps/openrc-0.13.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by

Re: [gentoo-user] PAM auto-adding ".db" suffix: feature or bug?

2014-08-23 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Sat, 2014-08-23 at 21:21 +0200, Jarry wrote: > Hi Gentoo-users, > > after playing with PAM for a few days I discovered one strange > thing: PAM adds ".db" suffix to database definition on its own! > What I mean is following: > _ > > more /etc/pam.d/postfix > authrequire

Re: [gentoo-user] Pin a package to a binary (quickpkg'd) version?

2014-08-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 23/08/2014 14:42, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 8/23/2014 8:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 23/08/2014 12:34, Tanstaafl wrote: >>> Is it possible to do this? > >> Not directly. I'm assuming you mean packages you built yourself and >> quick-pkg'ed them, not something available as a -bin > > Correct.

Re: [gentoo-user] PAM auto-adding ".db" suffix: feature or bug?

2014-08-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 23/08/2014 21:21, Jarry wrote: > Hi Gentoo-users, > > after playing with PAM for a few days I discovered one strange > thing: PAM adds ".db" suffix to database definition on its own! > What I mean is following: > _ > > more /etc/pam.d/postfix > authrequired pam_userdb.

[gentoo-user] PAM auto-adding ".db" suffix: feature or bug?

2014-08-23 Thread Jarry
Hi Gentoo-users, after playing with PAM for a few days I discovered one strange thing: PAM adds ".db" suffix to database definition on its own! What I mean is following: _ more /etc/pam.d/postfix authrequired pam_userdb.so db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users.db account requir

[gentoo-user] Re: Pin a package to a binary (quickpkg'd) version?

2014-08-23 Thread James
Jouni Kosonen tukesoft.com> writes: > Tanstaafl wrote: > > What I want is to be able to pin a specific package to the > > quickpkg'd > > version, so it doesn't get updated during an emerge world... > > Wouldn't it mostly work if you > a] Copied the package ebuild directory to a local overlay

[gentoo-user] Re: Pin a package to a binary (quickpkg'd) version?

2014-08-23 Thread Jouni Kosonen
Tanstaafl wrote: > > Bummer... > > What I want is to be able to pin a specific package to the quickpkg'd > version, so it doesn't get updated during an emerge world... Wouldn't it mostly work if you a] Copied the package ebuild directory to a local overlay to ensure the version keeps being a

Re: [gentoo-user] re: automounting removable drives

2014-08-23 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 10/08/2013 09:21 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > futhermore authorization from polkit/consolekit must be working, so > you must see 'active = TRUE' line when you run `ck-list-sessions` in your > Xfce's Terminal as a normal user, see this thread (first post of it): > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewt

Re: [gentoo-user] re: trouble with USB mouse on laptop

2014-08-23 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 08/08/2014 10:46 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Friday, August 08, 2014 10:30:55 AM Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I've been having trouble with USB mice on my laptop, with the mouse >> pointer and the scroll wheel not responding all the time. It's not until >> I click either button that

Re: [gentoo-user] Pin a package to a binary (quickpkg'd) version?

2014-08-23 Thread Tanstaafl
On 8/23/2014 8:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 23/08/2014 12:34, Tanstaafl wrote: Is it possible to do this? Not directly. I'm assuming you mean packages you built yourself and quick-pkg'ed them, not something available as a -bin Correct... I have buildpkg feature enabled in make.conf, so e

Re: [gentoo-user] Pin a package to a binary (quickpkg'd) version?

2014-08-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 23/08/2014 12:34, Tanstaafl wrote: > Is it possible to do this? > > Thanks... > > > Not directly. I'm assuming you mean packages you built yourself and quick-pkg'ed them, not something available as a -bin You can use emerge -K, so emerge will fail if there's no binpkg available. This will

[gentoo-user] Re:(Bug 510912) mesos ebuild

2014-08-23 Thread James
James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > mesos-0.18.0-r1.ebuild OOps, forget to post the link. http://gpo.zugaina.org/sys-cluster/mesos/RDep James

[gentoo-user] Pin a package to a binary (quickpkg'd) version?

2014-08-23 Thread Tanstaafl
Is it possible to do this? Thanks...

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-fs/lvm2 question

2014-08-23 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 08/23/2014 11:22 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 23/08/2014 09:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> On 08/23/2014 10:31 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 and older uses UDisks 1.x for controlling disk >>> spinning, like to reduce it >>> >>> xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1 and higher re

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-fs/lvm2 question

2014-08-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 23/08/2014 09:51, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On 08/23/2014 10:31 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 and older uses UDisks 1.x for controlling disk >> spinning, like to reduce it >> >> xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1 and higher removed UDisks 1.x dependency and >> the spindown feat

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-fs/lvm2 question

2014-08-23 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 08/23/2014 10:31 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > xfce4-power-manager-1.3.0 and older uses UDisks 1.x for controlling disk > spinning, like to reduce it > > xfce4-power-manager-1.3.1 and higher removed UDisks 1.x dependency and > the spindown feature, supposedly it had issues > and doesn't work with

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-fs/lvm2 question

2014-08-23 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 08/23/2014 09:53 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Alexander Kapshuk > wrote: >> On 08/22/2014 10:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk >>> wrote: As I updated my system today, I noticed that 'sys-fs/lvm2'

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-fs/lvm2 question

2014-08-23 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 23/08/14 09:53, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Alexander Kapshuk > wrote: >> On 08/22/2014 10:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk >>> wrote: As I updated my system today, I noticed that 'sys-fs/lvm2' got

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-fs/lvm2 question

2014-08-23 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On 08/23/2014 09:53 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Alexander Kapshuk > wrote: >> On 08/22/2014 10:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk >>> wrote: As I updated my system today, I noticed that 'sys-fs/lvm2'