On 23/08/2014 21:21, Jarry wrote: > Hi Gentoo-users, > > after playing with PAM for a few days I discovered one strange > thing: PAM adds ".db" suffix to database definition on its own! > What I mean is following: > _____________________ > > more /etc/pam.d/postfix > auth required pam_userdb.so db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users.db > account required pam_userdb.so db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users.db > > ls -l /etc/postfix/virtual_users.db > -rw------- 1 root root 12288 Aug 20 18:45 /etc/postfix/virtual_users.db > > testsaslauthd -u user1 -p password1 -s postfix > 0: NO "authentication failed" > > tail -n1 saslauth.log > saslauthd: pam_userdb(postfix:auth): user_lookup: could not open > database '/etc/postfix/virtual_users.db': no such file or directory > ______________________ > > Then I changed /etc/pam.d/postfix to: > > auth required pam_userdb.so db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users > account required pam_userdb.so db=/etc/postfix/virtual_users > > And now everything works. But there is no /etc/postfix/virtual_users > file, only /etc/postfix/virtual_users.db! > > So it seems to me PAM adds ".db" to database-definition itself > and user has to define it without ".db", otherwise what PAM is > actually looking for is /etc/postfix/virtual_users.db.db > > Is this normal? Never seen this "Windows-like" behaviour with > auto-adding suffix in *nix world. And I did not find anything > about it in PAM-documentation. It says just: > > pam_userdb.so db=/path/database > > Not a single word that user has to cut ".db" suffix from > "database" off. If all this is feature and not bug, then it > should definitely be mentioned somewhere...
Consult Google and find out more about postfix's postmaps with particular reference to how it's done if you use db files from sleepycat -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
