On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:00:18PM +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote
> I'm looking for the faster code, the run time to be faster - I compile
> the FEA & CFD code once but will be running many jobs.
>
> Andrew
Since you're asking on the Gentoo list, can I safely assume you use
Gentoo? Gentoo gives *
On 19/03/2012 10:18 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 03/19/12 22:02, Michael Mol wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
[snip]
...
...
[snip]
which currently ranks at 151 in the top 500 list :) It's amazing how
fast
On 03/18/2012 06:44 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Ok, I have never used genkernel, and have no desire to...
>
> I have no idea what dracut is or how to use it...
While genkernel also can generate kernel configs for you, both dracut
and genkernel are initramfs creators: they take repeated creation (after
Have two here - disk less atoms as mythtv front ends - seems a common use case
in the mythtv world. And another advantage is they sidestep the whole /user
mess :)
BillK
On 20/03/2012, at 7:49, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:33:39 +
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> As for mak
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:33:39 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> As for making /usr read-only; it is generally only writeable by root
> and anyone with the root password could remount rw anyway, so there's
> not much point there.
I was thinking here more of /usr mounted -t nfs
root on nfs client != ro
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:23:51 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:11:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > > > Why not connect that TV? ;)
> > >
> > > Because the hardware to do so would cost around £100, USB sticks
> > > cost rather less :P
> >
> > The hardware is more shi
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 01:04:04 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> - */bin vs */sbin is one. Nothing to do with security, but */sbin can
> go in root's PATH and apps that only makes sense when run as root (eg
> mkfs) go there. This avoids cluttering the display with useful crap
> from tab-completion
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:11:58 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > Why not connect that TV? ;)
> >
> > Because the hardware to do so would cost around £100, USB sticks cost
> > rather less :P
>
> The hardware is more shiny than the USB stick.
>
> Go on, do it. You know you want to.
If I had
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 08:48:08 -0700, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
> This appears to help with eth0 etc, but my openvpn fails with
>
> Linux ifconfig failed: could not execute external program
>
> Leaving the sbin symlink in place fixes this.
>
> I didn't see any gentoo bugs for this -- I can cre
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:58:22 -0400
"Walter Dnes" wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:35:26AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
>
> > > systemd is like Captain Picard of STTNG (Start Trek The Next
> > > Generation) always saying "make it so". *HOW DO YOU "MAKE IT SO"?
> > > That intelligence has to b
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:33:11 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
> > > And for the Lennart fanboi, his coding is
> > > so questionable that "Lennartware" has become derogatory slang. (Of
> > > course, you already know that.)
> >
> > And this is such a common term nowadays that when Googling for
>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:17:01 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:00:37 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
>
> > Personally I stopped bothering with a separate /usr ages ago, so I
> > don't really care.
>
> Having given this some thought recently, I am coming round to the view
> that the
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:35:26AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> > systemd is like Captain Picard of STTNG (Start Trek The Next
> > Generation) always saying "make it so". *HOW DO YOU "MAKE IT SO"?
> > That intelligence has to be somewhere. So what alternative do you
> > propose? A bash or ash
Have you checked it's not DNA related? - used IP numbers rather than urls in
pings etc?
Try panga/trace route to upstream IPs.
BillK
On 20/03/2012, at 0:33, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> Just got back from gentoo land.
>
> Arrrgh, gmail won't let me attach files, just sits there spinning.
>
> So
Hello!
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:26:21 -0600
Maxim Wexler wrote:
> ... The problem is syncing portage on another machine, my netbook,
> ubuntu-based.
>
You could just download the portage snapshot and unpack it on your
Gentoo machine.
Regards,
-
I can't sent a reply email with an attachment when using Yahoo mail in
Firefox. However, on a Windows box it works just fine with explorer. This
seem very strange because I can create a new email and a file attaches without
error, but when I reply to an email the attachment fails. Does this h
Hello everybody,
I need to install luaimap4 library on my computer. I can't find any
ebuilds and I was thinking Is there another way to install lua
libraries, which are written mostly in LUA?
I have found luarocks. Are there any other options?
Thanks very much
Ignas
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
wrote:
> it worked flawless for me. Nothing "bad" happened.
> If it's a server you could also build a monolithic Kernel and remove
> the dependency completly since most servers don't need loadable
> modules. It even adds a little security-wi
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 03:54:35 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> suddenly might Gentoo system doesn't boot anymore, not normally, at least.
>>
>> I get 'root' needs non existing service 'fsck' but I've no idea why.
>>
>> rc-update -u
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> Is there an ENOTICE warning in the ebuild to hit people over the head
> with these?
>
> Also, how trivial would it be to have the ebuild check the running
> kernel config (if available under /proc or wherever) for the necessary
> config opti
Just a minor correction. It's CONFIG_DEVTMPFS not CONFIG_DEV_TMPFS :)
> I just had a bit of a scare after updating to udev-181, but
> all is well now, finally. (I hope :)
>
> In addition to the separate /usr problem that has already
> been discussed at length here, there are other important
> cha
On 19/03/12 19:24, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 03/20/12 01:17, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 19/03/12 16:11, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 03/19/12 17:39, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 19/03/12 07:26, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
[snip]
...
.
On 03/20/12 01:17, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 19/03/12 16:11, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>> On 03/19/12 17:39, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> On 19/03/12 07:26, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
>> [snip]
>> ...
>> ...
>> [snip]
>>>
On 19/03/12 16:11, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 03/19/12 17:39, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 19/03/12 07:26, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
[snip]
...
...
[snip]
You don't need to "change" compilers. You can use whatever one you like
On 03/19/2012 03:54:35 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
suddenly might Gentoo system doesn't boot anymore, not normally, at
least.
I get 'root' needs non existing service 'fsck' but I've no idea why.
rc-update -u tells me about this, as well.
reemerging linux-utils and openrc didn't he
On 03/20/12 00:03, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>> On 03/19/12 20:34, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
>Has anyone played around w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
it worked flawless for me. Nothing "bad" happened.
If it's a server you could also build a monolithic Kernel and remove
the dependency completly since most servers don't need loadable
modules. It even adds a little security-wise...
with kind rega
Just got back from gentoo land.
Arrrgh, gmail won't let me attach files, just sits there spinning.
So I'll have to make do with pastebin.
http://paste.ubuntu.com/890854/
Is a chronicle of the commands entered. First having booted and not
changing anything, I do #ifconifg, then I do #route -n, t
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 03/19/12 20:34, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
>
On 03/19/2012 08:15 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:56 AM, walt wrote:
>> I just had a bit of a scare after updating to udev-181, but
>> all is well now, finally. (I hope :)
>>
>> In addition to the separate /usr problem that has already
>> been discussed at length here, there
Hello,
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012, Maxim Wexler wrote:
>root@gnubu:~# route -n
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
>0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 U 0 00 ppp0
>161.184.0.199 0.0.0.0 255.255.255
udev-181 merge is blocked because :
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools
("sys-apps/module-init-tools" is blocking sys-apps/kmod-7)
[blocks B ] sys-apps/kmod ("sys-apps/kmod" is blocking
sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.16-r1)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which canno
Andrew Lowe wht.com.au> writes:
> Has anyone played around with the various "better known"
> compilers on Gentoo? By "better known", I'm referring to gcc, Intel,
> llvm, pathscale. My situation is that I've just started my PhD which
> requires me to do Finite Element Analysis, FEA, an
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:56 AM, walt wrote:
> I just had a bit of a scare after updating to udev-181, but
> all is well now, finally. (I hope :)
>
> In addition to the separate /usr problem that has already
> been discussed at length here, there are other important
> changes in udev-181 to be a
I just had a bit of a scare after updating to udev-181, but
all is well now, finally. (I hope :)
In addition to the separate /usr problem that has already
been discussed at length here, there are other important
changes in udev-181 to be aware of.
First, I had to add two new items to my kernel c
Hi,
suddenly might Gentoo system doesn't boot anymore, not normally, at
least.
I get 'root' needs non existing service 'fsck' but I've no idea why.
rc-update -u tells me about this, as well.
reemerging linux-utils and openrc didn't help.
/etc/init.d/fsck is a normal file which conten
Am 19.03.2012 15:11, schrieb Andrew Lowe:
> On 03/19/12 17:39, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 19/03/12 07:26, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
> [snip]
> ...
> ...
> [snip]
>>
>> You don't need to "change" compilers. You can u
On March 19, 2012 at 9:13 AM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:48:54 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
>
> > And for the Lennart fanboi, his coding is
> > so questionable that "Lennartware" has become derogatory slang. (Of
> > course, you already know that.)
>
> And this is such
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 03/19/12 22:02, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
> Why show us what it was when it worked? What does route -n show from
> your broken Gentoo now?
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
Good question. Heading over there now. So if I can't get it working
there's gonna have to be some awkward shuttling back and forth.
>
> cat files-to-fetch.lst | cut -d " " -f1 | wget -c -i -
>
I know how to generate a fetch list and wget the files. The problem is
syncing portage on another machine, my netbook, ubuntu-based. Or
maybe, I could boot sysresc on the netbook. It's gentoo based IIRC and
do a re-sync back home as per
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 03/19/12 20:34, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
On 03/19/12 22:02, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
>>> Gentoo? By "better known", I'm referring to gcc, Intel,
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:44:33 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> route -n shows nothing except ppp0
> (this is from ubuntu, but it was the same for gentoo when it was
> working) root@gnubu:~# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> If
On 03/19/12 17:39, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 19/03/12 07:26, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
[snip]
...
...
[snip]
>
> You don't need to "change" compilers. You can use whatever one you like
> to build your program. The c
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:57:39 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
> > > How do I find out if I am actually *using* an initramfs right now
> > > (I know it
> > > is built into the kernel), and
>
> ls -l /boot/ will tell you.
No it won't, as the initramfs can be built into the kernel image.
>
On 03/19/12 20:34, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
>>> Gentoo? By "better known", I'm referring to gcc, Intel,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
>> Gentoo? By "better known", I'm referring to gcc, Intel, llvm, pathscale. My
>> situation is that I'v
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:49:56 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> > They ensure that there is an sshd configuration file and
>> > give a meaningful message (including where to find the sample) if it
>> > is not present, and check for the pr
William Kenworthy writes:
> On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 18:30 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > My laptop has used dracut since months ago, and suspends/resumes just
> > fine, as it does my media center.
> Genkernel doesnt, bugs and work arounds on gentoo bugzilla, with angry
> comments from a dev
Eliezer Croitoru writes:
> i want to try this systemd thingy, where do is start at?
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Systemd
Wonko
On 19/03/2012 04:03, William Kenworthy wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 18:30 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:39:59 -0500
Dale wrote:
Eliez
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 02:49:56 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > They ensure that there is an sshd configuration file and
> > give a meaningful message (including where to find the sample) if it
> > is not present, and check for the presence of the hostkeys (again
> > which are needed) and creat
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:45:06 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> * Really good in-site customization: The service unit files are
> trivially overrided with custom ones for specific installations,
> without needing to touch the ones installed by systemd or a program.
> With OpenRC, if I modify a /e
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:00:37 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
>
>> Personally I stopped bothering with a separate /usr ages ago, so I don't
>> really care.
>
> Having given this some thought recently, I am coming round to the view
> that the proble
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 08:50:28 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> How do I find out if I am actually *using* an initramfs right now (I
> know it is built into the kernel), and
If CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE is not set in your kernel config and you do
not have an initrd line in GRUB, you are not using an initra
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:09:14 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Your sarcasm fails because you think that there is an intrinsic reason
> to keep / seperate. Well, with / filled with usefull binaries to bring
> a hosed system back from the garbage pile that was true for some peole.
> But with the
i want to try this systemd thingy, where do is start at?
i have a vm for testing and i might will adopt it on the real one.
Thanks,
Eliezer
On 18/03/2012 09:28, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
it
or at least try it, and given the level of discussion you present, I'm
starting to think you don't actua
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:00:37 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
> Personally I stopped bothering with a separate /usr ages ago, so I don't
> really care.
Having given this some thought recently, I am coming round to the view
that the problem is /usr itself. It may have had a place when boot disks
were li
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:48:54 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
> And for the Lennart fanboi, his coding is
> so questionable that "Lennartware" has become derogatory slang. (Of
> course, you already know that.)
And this is such a common term nowadays that when Googling for
Lennartware only one
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
>> Gentoo? By "better known", I'm referring to gcc, Intel, llvm, pathscale. My
>> situation is that I'v
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
> Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
> Gentoo? By "better known", I'm referring to gcc, Intel, llvm, pathscale. My
> situation is that I've just started my PhD which requires me to do Finite
> Elem
FEA jobs can be parallelized, right? Take a hard look at CUDA and OpenCL.
ZZ
On Mar 19, 2012 1:29 AM, "Andrew Lowe" wrote:
> Hi all,
>Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
> Gentoo? By "better known", I'm referring to gcc, Intel, llvm, pathscale. My
> situatio
Hello!
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:44:20 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> You need to edit the file to remove duplicates and redundant mirrors
> (I can usually do it inside emacs in two minutes or less), and then
> check what files you already have in /usr/portage/distfiles (with a
> tiny bash
On 03/17/2012 05:11:23 AM, Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote:
This item just appeared after eix-sync:
HTPC ~ # eselect news read
2012-03-16-udev-181-unmasking
Title udev-181 unmasking
AuthorWilliam Hubbs
Posted2012-03-16
Revision
On 19/03/12 07:26, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone played around with the various "better known" compilers on
Gentoo? By "better known", I'm referring to gcc, Intel, llvm, pathscale.
My situation is that I've just started my PhD which requires me to do
Finite Element Analysis, FEA, and Comp
66 matches
Mail list logo
