On Tuesday 23 Aug 2011 03:17:41 Leonardo Guilherme wrote:
> I wonder if there's a way to active features to some specific
> packages, just like USE flags.
Yes i think you can use /etc/portage/env for something like this
for eg
if you want to enable it for amarok
create a file /etc/portage/env/m
On 08/23/2011 09:17 AM, Leonardo Guilherme wrote:
Hi.
I've turned on splitdebug feature (and -ggdb in CFLAGS) so debug
information are saved and I can debug anything that crashes. I went to
/usr/lib/debug, just out of curiosity, to see how much space was taken
and I found that it was almost 2GB,
On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:09:02 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 22.08.2011 20:29, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > update: edited the example in the gentoo-wiki now.
>
> replying to myself once more, which makes it feel more like a wiki or
> blog than a mailing-list ;-)
There wasn't much
On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:09:02 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 22.08.2011 20:29, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > update: edited the example in the gentoo-wiki now.
>
> replying to myself once more, which makes it feel more like a wiki or
> blog than a mailing-list ;-)
There wasn't much
Hi.
I've turned on splitdebug feature (and -ggdb in CFLAGS) so debug
information are saved and I can debug anything that crashes. I went to
/usr/lib/debug, just out of curiosity, to see how much space was taken
and I found that it was almost 2GB, which chromium + firefox adds up
1.5GB and python g
On 08/22/2011 01:41 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
>>> > > I don't think this is true - as long as the CHOST is identical, there
>>> > > should be no problem.
>> >
>> > CHOST defines the arch (i686, amd64, arm ..) whilst CFLAGS control gcc
>> > behavior and the binary code generation produced by compile
On 08/22/2011 01:41 PM, Alex Schuster wrote:
>>> > > I don't think this is true - as long as the CHOST is identical, there
>>> > > should be no problem.
>> >
>> > CHOST defines the arch (i686, amd64, arm ..) whilst CFLAGS control gcc
>> > behavior and the binary code generation produced by compile
On 22 August 2011 14:31, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
> wrote:
>> RewriteRule ^/website$ http://localhost/website/ [T]
>> ProxyPassMatch ^/website/(.*)$
>> http://localhost:8000/website/$1
>>
>>
>> The ProxyPassMatch fires but (AFAICT) the Rewrite
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
wrote:
> RewriteRule ^/website$ http://localhost/website/ [T]
> ProxyPassMatch ^/website/(.*)$
> http://localhost:8000/website/$1
>
>
> The ProxyPassMatch fires but (AFAICT) the RewriteRule does not. I.e.
> http://localhost/website (no slash
Hi all,
Gentoostats[0] is a GSoC 2011 project to collect package statistics from gentoo
machines. Please check it out. Bug reports and feature suggestions are welcome.
To submit your stats, use the app-portage/gentoostats ebuild from betagarden
overlay[1].
[0] https://soc.dev.gentoo.org/gentoost
Am 22.08.2011 20:29, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> update: edited the example in the gentoo-wiki now.
replying to myself once more, which makes it feel more like a wiki or
blog than a mailing-list ;-)
additional thoughts:
* as there is readahead-support in systemd I assume I could get rid of
Hi all,
I hope some Apache guru can help me out. I must be missing something
very obvious.
Assume a default Apache 2.2.17 with all modules installed and -D PROXY
-D INFO in /etc/conf.d/apache2.
My update to the default VHOST:
ForensicLog /var/log/apache2/forensic.log
ProxyRequests off
Thanks, I may need it because I am using freeswitch, but I need to
investigate further.
Nils Andresen wrote:
> Hi,
> according to http://www.mono-project.com/ODBC the System.Data should
> contain everything you need (aside from odbc, that is)
> So you'll need dev-lang/mono (and dev-db/unixODBC o
victor romanchuk writes:
> >> i had noticed that distcc is peevish about CFLAGS: these should be
> >> compatible on both client and server. in my case i made these
> >> similar on both machines (laptop is core2duo and desktop is
> >> core2quad; both are running amd64 arch)
> >
> > I don't think
Hi,
according to http://www.mono-project.com/ODBC the System.Data should
contain everything you need (aside from odbc, that is)
So you'll need dev-lang/mono (and dev-db/unixODBC or dev-db/libiodbc for odbc)
But - are you sure you'll want to do this? Odbc - really?
Yours,
Nils
2011/8/22 :
> Hi.
Hi. I have heard thet there are drivers for mono to work with unixodbc,
but can't figure out which package if any, I should emerge to get that
functionality.
Anyone know how to do this?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
>
> I'd like to use distcc to make the desktop do all the compiling during
> emerges. I've never been able to get distcc working properly, or, at
> least, I've never been able to get it working to the point where using
> distcc is any faster tha
Am 22.08.2011 20:24, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> The line:
>
> Requires=udev-settle.service
>
> missed, I added it and now it boots up straight and fast.
update: edited the example in the gentoo-wiki now.
S
Am 22.08.2011 19:03, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> I do hope you can figure this one out as I do like the idea of systemd. But I
> need RAID and LVM to work correctly for my system to boot.
Got it.
Compared this one:
https://github.com/falconindy/initscripts-systemd/blob/master/lvm.service
w/ th
On 22 August 2011 10:29, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 22.08.2011 18:58, schrieb Hilco Wijbenga:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just noticed that Portage wants me to upgrade to FF 6. I know,
>> however, that (some of) my plugins don't run in FF6. Not a problem,
>> I'll just mask FF6 ... oops ... there's no more
Am 22.08.2011 18:58, schrieb Hilco Wijbenga:
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that Portage wants me to upgrade to FF 6. I know,
> however, that (some of) my plugins don't run in FF6. Not a problem,
> I'll just mask FF6 ... oops ... there's no more FF5?
>
> Would it be possible to support FF5 a bit lo
On 22 August 2011 09:58, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
> Or is there a way to tell Portage to ignore upgrades but not downgrade FF?
I installed the FF5 ebuild in my overlay. That seems to work fine.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> I found it surprisingly painless. Note, I went through most of these
> steps with X *NOT* running; I switched to a terminal and stopped kdm
> before really going past step 2.
One additional note. Except for time spent compiling, this only took
On Monday, August 22, 2011 06:55:21 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2011-08-22 13:42, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> > That's unfortunate. The stop-service might be started to try to clean
> > up when it fails.
>
> Hm, yes, I understand.
>
> > What kind of RAID are you using? Does it perhaps rely
Hi all,
I just noticed that Portage wants me to upgrade to FF 6. I know,
however, that (some of) my plugins don't run in FF6. Not a problem,
I'll just mask FF6 ... oops ... there's no more FF5?
Would it be possible to support FF5 a bit longer? The devs at FF may
have gone a bit bananas but surely
Am 2011-08-22 13:42, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> That's unfortunate. The stop-service might be started to try to clean
> up when it fails.
Hm, yes, I understand.
> What kind of RAID are you using? Does it perhaps rely on a module
> that is loaded in the background? In which case you could try add
2011/8/21 Maximilian Bräutigam :
>
> Is is possible that ff and chromium are sending data to HDMI since it is
> card 0? If you think, it would be helpful to disable card 0 or change
> the order, please tell me how to do it?
Either make udev rules to create the devices in the correct order, or
spec
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:03:02 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
> Any preferred SIP softphone on Gentoo? I've used Ekiga on Windows and
> Ubuntu, and it's only moderately painful there, but it's very, very,
> very old on Gentoo.
Ekiga 3.2.7 is the latest on their web site and it has been in portage
for ju
Im using xlite on my gentoo workstation and have no trouble with it.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Kai Zemke
**
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
They are intended for
Any preferred SIP softphone on Gentoo? I've used Ekiga on Windows and
Ubuntu, and it's only moderately painful there, but it's very, very,
very old on Gentoo.
If there are no good options, I'll stick with the SIP client on my
android phone, for now. (hardphone isn't an option)
--
:wq
Am 21.08.2011 12:57, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
Am Sonntag 21 August 2011, 04:48:49 schrieb Dale:
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
Hello all,
I recently bought a Zotac Barebone ZBOX HD-AD02 AMD E-350 and installed
Gentoo on it, what is working more or less very well except the sound. I
did every
Am 21.08.2011 12:24, schrieb Leonardo Guilherme:
2011/8/21 Maximilian Bräutigam:
Hello all,
I recently bought a Zotac Barebone ZBOX HD-AD02 AMD E-350 and installed
Gentoo on it, what is working more or less very well except the sound. I
did everything according to gentoo and gentoowiki docs, I
On Sunday 21 August 2011 20.26:40 Dan Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some help with writing udev-rules for capi.
> After playing around some I decided to ask for help here as can't really
> get it to work.
>
> What I want ist the following:
> /dev/capi20 68,0
> /dev/capi/capi# 191,#
>
> 68,
On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:31:19 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 22.08.2011 12:26, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> > Are they actually started in the right order?
> > In other words, first RAID, then LVM?
>
> I don't know ;-)
>
> I still try to understand all this.
> There is no specific RAID-s
2011/8/22 Space Cake :
> 2011-08-19 14:54 keltezéssel, Nikos Chantziaras írta:
>> On 08/19/2011 03:02 PM, Space Cake wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> after playing a lot with desktop environment first I've decided to move
>>> from kde to gnome because kde is too "shine" and eat too much and
>>> contains a lo
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:47:02 +0200, Space Cake wrote:
> So, what if I have changed the flags to -kde and -gnome, and I also ran
> depclean, also used the script provided by some kind member of the list
> and I still have all the kde gnome stuff on my system? Do I need some
> list of packages shoul
Am 22.08.2011 12:26, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
> Are they actually started in the right order?
> In other words, first RAID, then LVM?
I don't know ;-)
I still try to understand all this.
There is no specific RAID-service-file, so it seems to be done by udev
and the related target/service somehow
On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:54:48 AM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 22.08.2011 10:26, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> > What I wonder: what changes between running into that timeout and my
> > pressing Ctrl-D?
>
> To me it seems that the underlying RAID-device (which is the PV inside
> the LVM
Am 22.08.2011 10:26, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> What I wonder: what changes between running into that timeout and my
> pressing Ctrl-D?
To me it seems that the underlying RAID-device (which is the PV inside
the LVM-VG) isn't up fast enough.
Trying to figure it out now.
2011-08-19 14:54 keltezéssel, Nikos Chantziaras írta:
> On 08/19/2011 03:02 PM, Space Cake wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> after playing a lot with desktop environment first I've decided to move
>> from kde to gnome because kde is too "shine" and eat too much and
>> contains a lot of feature which I don't real
next box tested.
Installed systemd on my main workstation now that I understood how to
easily flip back to booting w/ openrc in case of problems.
I heavily use LVM here and this gives me the following issues:
I use lvm.service from the gentoo-wiki:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Systemd#LVM
Fo
41 matches
Mail list logo
