On Monday, August 22, 2011 12:31:19 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 22.08.2011 12:26, schrieb Joost Roeleveld: > > Are they actually started in the right order? > > In other words, first RAID, then LVM? > > I don't know ;-) > > I still try to understand all this. > There is no specific RAID-service-file, so it seems to be done by udev > and the related target/service somehow. > > > lvm.service says > > After=udev-settle.service > > so udev should detect all devices first, then lvm.service gets started. > > But somehow this doesn't work here, only after hitting that timeout one > time.
That's unfortunate. The stop-service might be started to try to clean up when it fails. What kind of RAID are you using? Does it perhaps rely on a module that is loaded in the background? In which case you could try adding that module as a dependency? -- Joost
