did you tried django as web framework ???
El lun, 07-07-2008 a las 21:15 -0400, James escribió:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm writing a web application in CherryPy. What a beautiful thing it
> is to write Python code and get a simple yet powerful web output. :)
>
> The web application needs to have some dec
Hi All,
I'm writing a web application in CherryPy. What a beautiful thing it
is to write Python code and get a simple yet powerful web output. :)
The web application needs to have some decent level of security and
authentication implemented.
The big issue here is that the user password is stored
Hello,
Simple question; has anyone installed Gentoo on a tablet-pc? I am thinking
about it but wanted to hear advice and/or stories.
I have a Gateway M280E. Works OK with Windows Vista Business ...
Thanks for the time...
--
Regards,
Christopher Koeber
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 08:09:38AM -0500, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 16:31 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > Yessir, it does...
> >
> > dev-libs/pwlib-1.10.10-r1 USE="alsa ldap sdl ssl v4l xml -debug
> > -ieee1394 -ipv6 -oss -sasl -v4l2"
> >
> > Is there anything else I should
Hi,
Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
[...]
It turns out that many, many executables require libselinux.so.1,
despite what the documentation of "--depclean" in "man emerge" says (or
what I think it says -- is this a bug or operator error?)
Sadly sys-apps/coreutils is one of them.
Recent versions -
Daniel Iliev wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:16:33 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
I am the author and I tell you that there is no problem. I am the
only person who could sue you and I can't if I did tell you before
that there is no problem.
You may tell whatever you w
Kevin O'Gorman schrieb:
I had cause to reboot my gentoo box this morning, and it was an
unexpected disaster.
For some reason, my two PCI-X SATA controllers decided to switch
places in the /dev/sd* lists.
My /etc/fstab had explicit drive paths hard-coded, and they tried to
mount stuff that
didn't
I had cause to reboot my gentoo box this morning, and it was an
unexpected disaster.
For some reason, my two PCI-X SATA controllers decided to switch
places in the /dev/sd* lists.
My /etc/fstab had explicit drive paths hard-coded, and they tried to
mount stuff that
didn't exist, and naturally faile
Am Montag 07 Juli 2008 21:04:15 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heyho,
>
> ...
> a lot of new FUD
>
> > you. Feel free to prove us wrong.
>
> I am sorry, but I cannot see any sense in talking to a person who uses
> "majestatis pluralis" for his claims.
I doe
Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heyho,
...
a lot of new FUD
> you. Feel free to prove us wrong.
I am sorry, but I cannot see any sense in talking to a person who uses
"majestatis pluralis" for his claims.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
Heyho,
> > Click on License. It's also in the file Copyright.txt in
> > cmake-2.4.8.tar.gz, for example.
>
> Let me quote _this_ file to verify that there is a 4 clause BSDL.
>
> The fact that cmake may have been changed a few weeks ago does not matter.
> At the time when Bloch and Co. did replace
On 7/7/08, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me quote _this_ file to verify that there is a 4 clause BSDL.
Jörg, there are indeed four asterisks/clauses to count. But which
clause represents the original "GPL-incompatible" advertising clause?
IANAL, but I cannot see that clause in t
Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please point to a cmake with a 3 clause BSDl!
>
> http://www.cmake.org
>
> Click on License. It's also in the file Copyright.txt in cmake-2.4.8.tar.gz,
> for example.
Let me quote _this_ file to verify that there is a 4 clause BSDL.
The fact that c
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:16:23PM +0100, Penguin Lover Graham Murray squawked:
> Willie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Where is this suggestion mentioned? Is there a bug number?
>
> The Gentoo bug is http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221141
Ah! Thanks. I see that there is another w
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The reality, regardless of what Debian, or the FSF, or you,
or any lawyers say, is that the licensing issue has not been
tested in court yet. Unless and until that happens, the
whole debate is pure theory. Debian is clearly no
Am Montag 07 Juli 2008 17:45:37 flamete Joerg Schilling:
> > Back to my statement: iirc the Debian people refused to establish a
> > whole new build chain to circumvent the problem, that they saw when
> > distributing cdrtools.
>
> The original build system in cdrtools is not GPL but it is included
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They claimed that the official build system was not legal but they replaced
it with a build system that definitely is not legal because it is not
included in the source.
Of course the files needed to build cdrkit are in the source
Am Montag 07 Juli 2008 17:30:06 schwätzte Joerg Schilling:
> Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > They claimed that the official build system was not legal but they
> > > replaced it with a build system that definitely is not legal because it
> > > is not included in the source.
> >
> >
Joerg Schilling wrote:
They claimed that the official build system was not legal but they replaced it
with a build system that definitely is not legal because it is not included in
the source.
You keep saying this, but I just don't see where it's coming from.
Firstly, the cdrkit source ships
Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please finally stop your FUD!
> >
> > The CDDL definitely is a free license and Sun will definitely not publish
> > any packages that could create problems.
> >
> I *never* stated that CDDL is unfree. What I stated a couple of days
> ago, is that
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.07.08 17:28]:
> Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.07.08 13:14]:
> > > Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I know I should not feed trolls but
> > >
> > > > Here is a fact for
Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They claimed that the official build system was not legal but they replaced
> > it with a build system that definitely is not legal because it is not
> > included in the source.
>
> Of course the files needed to build cdrkit are in the source
> (CMake
Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.07.08 13:14]:
> > Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I know I should not feed trolls but
> >
> > > Here is a fact for you: Every mainstream binary distro dropped cdrtools.
> > > It is their
(Summary: I had a problem with installing grub into the MBR.
Two thoughtful replies set me straight)
At Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:46:34 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:02:08 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> grub> find /boot/grub/stage1
>> (hd0,2)
>>
Mike Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reality, regardless of what Debian, or the FSF, or you,
> or any lawyers say, is that the licensing issue has not been
> tested in court yet. Unless and until that happens, the
> whole debate is pure theory. Debian is clearly not willing
> to t
"Daniel Pielmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/7, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Out of curiosity I tried a manual install and /usr/include/scg/ was not
> > > created at all. The command i used was
> > >
> > > ./Gmake INS_BASE
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:07:44 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > > There is a difference between repeating and reporting. Reporting the
> > > opinions of others is legal in most Western countries, with certain,
> > > usually reasonable, constraints.
> >
Willie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Where is this suggestion mentioned? Is there a bug number?
The Gentoo bug is http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221141
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
> They claimed that the official build system was not legal but they replaced
> it with a build system that definitely is not legal because it is not
> included in the source.
Of course the files needed to build cdrkit are in the source (CMakeLists.txt).
Does any program that uses autotools come
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.07.08 13:14]:
> Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know I should not feed trolls but
>
> > Here is a fact for you: Every mainstream binary distro dropped cdrtools.
> > It is their right to choose which packets they want to distribute and
>
"Daniel Pielmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am sorry to see that you try to write FUD:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debburn/cdrkit/trunk/FORK?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
of course verifies my claim.
They claimed that the official build system was not legal but they replaced it
with a build system tha
Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no approval process for free licenses within Debian:
>
> "Please note however, that the Debian project decides on particular
> packages rather than licenses in abstract, and the lists are general
> explanations. It is possible to have a pac
On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 16:31 -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> Yessir, it does...
>
> dev-libs/pwlib-1.10.10-r1 USE="alsa ldap sdl ssl v4l xml -debug
> -ieee1394 -ipv6 -oss -sasl -v4l2"
>
> Is there anything else I should check? Perhaps I should enable OSS
> support as well...? I mean, it may work,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:16:33 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
If you repeat the "opinion" of other people, you make it _your_ opinion
and if your opinion may harm other people, you are not allowed to
publish it unless you are able t
2008/7/7, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Out of curiosity I tried a manual install and /usr/include/scg/ was not
> > created at all. The command i used was
> >
> > ./Gmake INS_BASE=/home/billie/cdrtools-test/ install
>
> Is this intended to
Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Out of curiosity I tried a manual install and /usr/include/scg/ was not
> created at all. The command i used was
>
> ./Gmake INS_BASE=/home/billie/cdrtools-test/ install
Is this intended to be a joke or do you really like to ask me why it did not do
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:07:44 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > There is a difference between repeating and reporting. Reporting the
> > opinions of others is legal in most Western countries, with certain,
> > usually reasonable, constraints.
>
> Sorry, you missunderstand this at an important po
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OK, I forgot that you might have contact to a competitor. In this case, it
> > should be possible to force shops to clearly separate the selling point for
> > non-standard products from the products th
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It just says that it echoes the data to /dev/dsp (or another given
> > > device). So it's bound to exactly that device interface :(
> >
> > Well, if you did read the man paghe, you know that cdda2wav
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:11:59 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know I should not feed trolls but
...otherwise, you'd starve to death.
>
> > Here is a fact for you: Every mainstream binary distro dropped
> > cdrtools. It is the
Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know I should not feed trolls but
> Here is a fact for you: Every mainstream binary distro dropped cdrtools.
> It is their right to choose which packets they want to distribute and
> they don't owe you an explanation.
Solaris (the only distribution w
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:16:33 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > If you repeat the "opinion" of other people, you make it _your_ opinion
> > and if your opinion may harm other people, you are not allowed to
> > publish it unless you are able to definitely
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:16:33 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Do you know what defamation and slander is?
> > >
> > > If people did not believe in unproven and untrue claims, there
> > > was no problem. It therefore seems to be im
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:16:33 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> If you repeat the "opinion" of other people, you make it _your_ opinion
> and if your opinion may harm other people, you are not allowed to
> publish it unless you are able to definitely prove it!
There is a difference between repeating
Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having trouble burning a 4Gb tarball at the moment. Not sure what
> all the problem is but I had another DVD with one. This is the command
> I use and the error less the looong list of files:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] / # tar -xvf /media/hdd/Data_2008.07.
2008/7/5, Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Joerg Schilling schrieb:
> >
> > This is a really bad idea.
> > /usr/include/scg/ is a planned directory that is known to be unique.
> >
> > cdrkit does not deliver anything that is even approximately useful as a
> replacement for libscg.
> >
> > In
Sebastian Günther wrote:
Everthing looks OK, but if there were more than 4 million files in that
tarball, then you could run into trouble ;-)
Only thing, what comes in mind, is that the filesystem, where the
tarball itself resides, has problems with files bigger than 2,2 GB and
the tarball
2008/7/7, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Also note that these people from Debian (whose claims have been repeated) have
> ZERO credibiltiy. In September 2006, when they started cdrkit, they claimed
> that there were exactly two problems:
>
> Claim 1:"The CDDL is not a free license"
* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.07.08 11:17]:
>
> Short answer: in a democracy, your freedom ends where you may start to
> influence the freedom of others.
>
No, that's anarchy you describing, in democracy the majority decides
were your personal freedom ends.
>
>
> Long answer:
>
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you know what defamation and slander is?
> >
> > If people did not believe in unproven and untrue claims, there was no
> > problem.
> > It therefore seems to be important to prevent underlying "messages"...
>
> Do you understand opinion? This is
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:02:08 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> grub> find /boot/grub/stage1
> (hd0,2)
>
> As expected hd0 is the disk
You should now run "root (hd0,2)"
> grub> setup (hd
> Possible disks are: hd0 hd1
>
> Again confirming that hd0 is a valid disk (as is hd
51 matches
Mail list logo
