* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.07.08 17:28]: > Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [07.07.08 13:14]: > > > Daniel Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I know I should not feed trolls but.... > > > > > > > Here is a fact for you: Every mainstream binary distro dropped cdrtools. > > > > It is their right to choose which packets they want to distribute and > > > > they don't owe you an explanation. > > > > > > Solaris (the only distribution where lawyers checked the license) happily > > > distributes the original cdrtools. > > > > > > > No wonder: OpenSolaris is mainly under CDDL. *There* you have anything > > needed zu circumvent the licence issue. > > Please finally stop your FUD! > > The CDDL definitely is a free license and Sun will definitely not publish > any packages that could create problems. > I *never* stated that CDDL is unfree. What I stated a couple of days ago, is that in *my opinion* the CDDL undermines freedom.
Back to my statement: iirc the Debian people refused to establish a whole new build chain to circumvent the problem, that they saw when distributing cdrtools. What I just stated in my previous mail: There *is* the appropiate build chain within OpenSolaris cdrtools, so there isn't the problem, that the Debian people have with the whole issue. Sebastian -- " Religion ist das Opium des Volkes. " Karl Marx [EMAIL PROTECTED]@N GÜNTHER mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpG2ZV5dSt8a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
