Petteri Räty wrote:
Christian Faulhammer kirjoitti:
Hi,
in the Emacs overlay we imported the bzr.eclass from the xeffects
overlay. In the near future Emacs development will switch from CVS to
Bazaar and thus we need the new eclass in Portage to still provide our
live ebuilds from app-editors/e
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Christian Faulhammer kirjoitti:
in the Emacs overlay we imported the bzr.eclass from the xeffects
overlay. In the near future Emacs development will switch from
CVS to Bazaar
Petteri Räty wrote:
Mike Auty kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Defining required amount of activity for ebuild devs. I would like us
to raise the required amount of activity for ebuild devs.
Given that the low number of developers is ranked as our number one
problem in Donnie's informal survey
Petteri Räty wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
As others have commented, I don't agree with this point. Also, you're
forgetting we have quite a few people working on this project and that
we have many different roles.
>
And you are assuming tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ferris McCormick wrote:
|
| I think nominations are open. I nominate
| rane
| welp
| zlin
|
| I think I've spelt all of them correctly and that all three are are
| qualified.
|
| Regards,
| Ferris
éí¢‡^¾X¬¶È žÚ(¢¸&j)bž bst==
As Łukasz replied,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Freeman wrote:
| Duncan wrote:
|> Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
|> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
|> Tue, 03
|> Jun 2008 22:26:20 -0600:
|>
|>> AFAIR nominating has always been open to anyone, dev and user alike.
|>
|> Which doe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What's the need for a GLEP covering "live" ebuilds and what's wrong with
- - ebuilds? I made myself that question when GLEP54 was submitted and
during the initial discussion. At that time, I wasn't convinced of the
need for such a GLEP. Now I thin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
This is a quick reminder that the period for making and accepting
nominations will end on June 18, 2008 23:59 UTC - end of next Wednesday.
The current nominees and the state of their acceptance can be checked on
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
The nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008 election were closed at
23:59:59 UTC June 18th, 2008. The voting for the new council will begin
at 00:00 UTC June 21st, 2008 and will end at 23:59:59 UTC July 4th.
There were 36 nominees to the counc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arun Raghavan wrote:
| On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Richard Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot
|
| This is the second time in 8 days that you are doing this. Please stop
| filling our inboxes with this puerile t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:17:56 +0400
| * have some insane paranoid conviction that Freenode staff are the ones
| busy spying on everything they say, whilst conveniently forgetting to
| notice that Gentoo's own infra team and cu
tact there.
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo- forums/userrel/Sparc/KDE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
| On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
|
|> Hi folks,
|>
|> Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
|> replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ingmar.
Ingmar Vanhassel wrote:
| Hello list,
|
| As usual with this kind of mails, this has been long overdue, but it's
| about time that I retire from Gentoo.
I'm sorry to see you go, but it's not a surprise.
Thanks for all the hard work in Gen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bo.
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
| My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active
for
| several months.
I'm sorry to see you go, but it isn't a surprise.
Thanks for all the hard work in Gentoo and in QT/KDE in particular. Als
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
| On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
|
|> Hi folks,
Hi again.
|> Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
|> replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
| Hi everyone,
|
| Please consider a PROPERTIES=live value that, when set in an ebuild,
| will serve to indicate that the ebuild will use some form of "live"
| source code that may vary each time that the package is installed.
| The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Zac Medico wrote:
| Hello again,
|
| I'd like to get some feedback about what people would like to have
| in the final EAPI 2. In planning for this EAPI bump, we should
| strike a balance somewhere in between everything that we'd like to
| have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan and others wrote:
|
| Moves as for kde/kde-meta might be an issue,
You can leave kde meta packages out of this discussion as our plan is to
move to sets. We're going to have sets for 4.1* and plan to completely
drop meta packages for 4.2.
- -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
| On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
|
|> Getting the bot out there
|> -
|> If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
|> each channel fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
Some members of the KDE team have been talking for some time about
having a FHS compliant install (define KDE prefix as /usr instead of
/usr/kde/). The most important consequence of that option is
that it won't be possible to have 2 or more KD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again.
Quoting Zac earlier in #gentoo-portage:
21:46 < zmedico> jmbsvicetto: I think we essentially have a spec already
that people can agree on. just take my draft and subtract the eapi*
functions and the gitweb unpack extension.
So we're talki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>> On Monday 29 September 2008 01:37:03 Zac Medico wrote:
Why the need for multiple solutions at all? PROPERTIES=set is too weird
and involves too much nonsensical behaviour to be useful.
>>> I do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following the previous thread about the KDE FHS install, I've earlier
committed a new global use flag - kdeprefix.
I did it without remembering that we're expected to mail the dev ml
before adding global use flags. This flag is now added in the kde4
ec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:31:46 -0700
>> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Can package.use syntax be extended to allow set entries?
@compiz-fusion -gnome kde kde4
>>> Perhaps, but we need to clarify
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a revised version of the PROPERTIES=set proposal which has
> been discussed previously [1].
>
< snip a detailed proposal about a new kind of set>
Let me try show some real examples of the type of sets I w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ulrich.
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>
>> "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> With the help of Ingmar we did some cleanup and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gordon Malm wrote:
All the technical discussion on the above is perfectly fine, but the way
the arguments are being presented and the tone used by both sides is
getting arguments into a thin line from becoming flames.
Please step back before turning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following
packages have been reassigned to maintainer-needed and can take some
love. You know the drill, so if you want to maintain any of them please
add yourself to the metadata.xml.
packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:31:34 +0100
> Thomas Sachau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 1. i dont read it ;-)
>> 2. it is around help with every sort of ebuilds, not only those in or
>> for sunrise, so would have some "spam" e.g. for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
This is a heads-up that the nominations will close in approximately 48
hours. So if you want to nominate anyone (yourself?), go on and send
your mail to the gentoo-council ml.
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have 1 open council slot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow devs, users and Gentoo community.
The nominations for the empty seat in the 2008 Gentoo Council were
closed at 23:59:59 UTC November 28th, 2008. The voting for the empty
seat will begin in a few minutes and will end at 23:59:59 UTC Decemb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
This is a final warning that if you are an eligible voter you have ~36
hours left to cast your vote - before 00H00 UTC Saturday 6th Dec.
At this point, we have *57* submitted votes from the *245* eligible
voters - which means a turnout of around 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following the processing of wltjr's retirement, the following packages
have been reassigned to maintainer-needed and can take some love. You
know the drill, so if you want to maintain any of them please add
yourself to the metadata.xml.
dev-db/firebir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> On Monday 08 of December 2008 11:34:21 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
>> Following advise from https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=250179, I'm
>> bringing it here.
>
> Hm, i totally don't agree with the original comment from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:25:44 -0500
> Olivier Crête <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The "can be tested properly" phase is when it's in ~arch...
>> That also means that to pull a significant number of ebuilds it forces
>> mostly e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Seeing as I've been very busy with other areas of Gentoo, that I haven't
been active in SPARC land for quite some time and that SPARC AT members
and users deserve an active lead, I've talked to Ferris (fmccor) and he
accepted my "resignation" as A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I talked to Zac earlier in #gentoo-portage about adding an
entry to package.mask for KDE-4.2.0 using slot deps. Thomas
and Patrick raised the concern we might need profile
eapis and that PMS nailed p.mask to EAPI-0.
Zac confirmed that the first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 21:04 Sun 25 Jan , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:25:44 -0100
>> "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote:
>>> I talked to Zac earlier in #gentoo-portage about adding an
/ SPARC / KDE
Index: bzr.eclass
===
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/bzr.eclass,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -b -B -r1.1 bzr.eclass
--- bzr.eclass 25 Oct 2008 12:17:23 - 1.1
+++ bzr.eclass 14 Feb 2009 18:03:39 -
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
# @MAINTAINER:
# Jorge Manuel B.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Sled wrote:
> Markus Meier writes:
>> semantic-desktop: Semantic desktop allows for storage of digital
>> information and its metadata to allow the user to express his personal
>> mental models, making all in formation become intuitively accessib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:02:46 -0800
> Brian Harring wrote:
< snip a few arguments>
Ciaran and Brian,
please respect Pettery's request and move your discussion to the GLEP55
thread or to another thread, but leave it out of thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alistair Bush wrote:
> Here is an issue that is currently being faced by the java project that
> I would like to bring to the attention of everyone. I have already
> discussed this will devs from all pm's.
>
> Intro:
>
> Within the java project we h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alistair Bush wrote:
>
>
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On 19:18 Mon 02 Mar , Alistair Bush wrote:
>>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>
>> Could you explain what you see as the important difference that makes
>> package.mask bad and a separate overlay good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Caleb Cushing wrote:
> I'd like to start with, I'm not trying to stir up trouble but since
> questions were asked i'll answer them.
>
>> If you think neither should exist why do you have an opinion about this at
>> all?
>
> I merged the java-overlay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200
> Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite intentional
>> and currently desired.
>
> This is fundamentally broken as a concept.
>
> Adding an overla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> On Monday, 02. March 2009 10:29:59 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> Also, having separate overlays would allow one to do experimental stuff
>> with eclasses in the experimental overlay without affecti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> This seems desirable and reasonable.
>> As I replied to this subject earlier regarding KDE, let me complement
>> that information. In the case of the KDE team, we keep wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Petteri Räty schrieb:
>>> Thomas Sachau wrote:
I would like to know, if there is some policy about editing skel.* files
or who owns/maintains them.
Additionally, i suggest some ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:26:36 +0100
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>>> Why? It was an official EAPI agreed upon by the Gentoo KDE project.
>>> Having it there is helpful for package manager people, and removing
>>> it would just mean m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alin Năstac wrote:
> Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
> versions than ${PV}.
> Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
I opted to reply to your mail after reading all the other replies.
FWIW, I agree wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following
packages have been reassigned to maintainer-needed and can take some
love. You know the drill, so if you want to maintain any of them please
add yourself to the metadata.xml.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Following this month processing of the retirement batch, the following
packages had their metadata.xml updated to remove all maintainers that
were retired.
If you are a maintainer or a member of a herd listed in these packages,
you may want to rev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As the KDE team prepares to add revised eclasses for the KDE3 ebuilds so
we can get 3.5.10 marked stable and then finally ask for KDE4
stabilization, we'd like to drop some old eclasses from the tree. We
plan to drop the kde-base, kde-dist, kde-i1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> As the KDE team prepares to add revised eclasses for the KDE3 ebuilds so
>> we can get 3.5.10 marked stable and then finally ask for KDE4
>> stabiliz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > any project lead/member can post an answer to this mail for a status
> > report:
> >
Hi.
Gentoo KDE team status report.
Current:
- We have a Lead again (me). It happened on FOSDEM, so it might have
been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 17 May 2009, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
>
>> 2009/5/17 Piotr Jaroszyñski :
>
>>> 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously)
>>> 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change
>>> 3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2009, 17:00 -0700 schrieb Josh Saddler:
>> AllenJB wrote:
>>> I'd favor tags over increasing the category
>>> levels, tho I'm not convinced either is necessary at the current time
>>> (tho tags might make
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/
If you want to ask a question or share your thoughts, contact any of
the election officials:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (jmbsvicetto)
Łukasz Damentko (rane)
Roy Bamford (neddyseagoon)
Shyam Mani (fox2mike) will be doing infra magic.
You can send us an e-mail (g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
...
>> A quick scan shows that the following eclasses were deprecated more
>> than three years ago, and are used by no ebuild in the tree:
>>
>>2002-05-25 inherit.eclass
>>2003-12-11 kde-i18n.ecla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Anderson wrote:
...
... please remember to vote for gentoofan23, not tanderson(irc nick). ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
This is why everyone should verify their votes when submitting them.
Don't forget to run:
$ votify --verify
If you use a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hello fellow developers and users.
>
> Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
> two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
Nominations are now closed.
An email with fur
Hi.
I'm forwarding Ned's (solar) mail accepting his nomination for the council.
--
Regards,
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE
--- Begin Message ---
As I'm not subscribed to the getnoo-dev mailing list but rather make use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again.
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hello fellow developers and users.
>
> Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
> two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
The "voting booth" has now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Due to an oversight on my part, the _reopen_nominations candidate was
not initially added to the ballots for the council200906 election. This
has now been fixed.
If you have already voted, please add it (if you want to) to your
ballot. I suggest v
ndrew D Kirch wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>
> I move that we elect George W Bush and Ciaran McCreesh Council Members
> For Life.
> Are these people serious?
>
> Andrew
Andrew,
I've chosen to reply to this particular mail, but this applies to your
other mails in th
Hello.
This is a remainder that the voting for this Council's election will end
at 23:59:59 UTC June 30rd - which means in less than 44 hours.
At the moment, we have 101 casted votes which means ~ 41% of attendance.
If you haven't voted yet, please hurry to your booth located at
woodpecker. You ca
Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>>> What I'd like to see for sure is a formal rule on who can decide to
>>> modify or change parts of glep 39. As it's the council's constitution
>>> somehow, we have two options from my pov (besides that a former council
>>> did decide the council itsel
I'm forwarding Roy's email to the dev-announce ml for reaching the wider
community and for future reference.
Roy Bamford wrote:
> All,
>
> On behalf of the Elections project, the next Gentoo Council will be
> composed of:-
>
> Ned Ludd (solar)
> Petteri Räty (betelgeuse)
>
Hi Torsten.
Torsten Veller wrote:
> * "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" :
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council/2009/council-200906-nominees.xml
>
> Please archive the manifestos somewhere under the project space
> like it was done the last years.
> L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-07-2012 21:09, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:03:14 +0200 Peter Stuge
> wrote:
>
>> William Hubbs wrote:
>>> let's move all of the discussion of this to the bug if possible
>>> so that it is all in one place.
>>
>> That's fine an
this change.
I'll try to help the docs team updating the handbook.
Title: Changes on new stages
Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2012-07-27
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Starting with catalyst 2.0.10, make.conf and make.profile will be
moved from /e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 00:19, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il 23/07/2012 17:07, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto:
>> from /etc to /etc/postfix.
>
> Are you really sure? I don't think Portage looks for it there ...
> ;)
Thanks Dieg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 01:33, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
>>
>> I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone
>> have any comments about it?
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 00:07, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone
> have any comments about it? The idea is to show this news item on
> all Gentoo systems. Is tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 08:48, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:07:59AM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S.
> Vicetto wrote:
>> I've talked with both the PR and Docs team before about this
>> change. I'll try to help the doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 06:54, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 23-07-2012 22:10:08 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
>> wrote:
>>> This is just a heads-up for Gentoo users that got use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 09:29, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
>> I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone
>> have any comments about it?
>
> Several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-07-2012 13:29, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Aaron W. Swenson
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 07/24/2012 04:19 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> Another user opinion...it would be a signifi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-08-2012 20:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Also, we're getting rather a lot of *DEPEND variables here... If
> we're making people make major changes to their deps, which for
> HDEPEND we definitely would be, then the "it's expensive since
> peopl
sible to filter with default/linux/*, if there are other
alternatives or if we will have to list *all* relevant profiles (the
latter case is not appealing).
Does anyone have any comments about this news item?
Title: make.conf and make.profile move to /etc/portage
Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
change and what to do. The second one (this one) is directed
to catalyst users.
This news item should be presented to all users running a version of
catalyst prior to 2.0.11.
Does anyone have any comments about this news item?
Title: Catalyst updates
Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Content
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the second draft for this news item.
On 06-09-2012 03:52, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Following the July 24th thread about changing the default location
> of make.conf and make.profile in the new stages,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This news item was committed.
On 06-09-2012 03:55, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Following the July 24th thread about changing the default location
> of make.conf and make.profile in the new stages, I propose to
> comm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This news item was committed.
On 06-09-2012 03:52, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Following the July 24th thread about changing the default location
> of make.conf and make.profile in the new stages, I propose to
> comm
rds,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer
t it relied on fingerprint of
images and time delays. To me it would make more sense to get a "console"
and grep the output for relevant strings.
I don't know if / how it evolved, so this might no longer be true.
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer
r view required to make sure people have a
real interest in being in this community and know enough to be able to
maintain packages (for those applying for ::gentoo access).
Best regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer
PS - Let's please move all this discussion to the proj
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules and I was
distracted, irc is not mandatory.
I've got confirmation that nothing has changed, so irc is not mandatory.
I hope this clears any misunderstandings a
me/releases/auto/
[2] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352152
Thanks
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
PS - I still haven't fixed my Gentoo email setup, so I wasn't following
this
thread until someone hinted about it.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 25 March 2013 09:30, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
I'll say it again: if we don't make install media anymore and
tell people to use SRCD instead, we will lose installation
support for at least alpha, pp
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
My issue with what we are currently doing is not whether we have a
default network provider in the stages or not, but it is just that the
netifrc use flag on OpenRC is bogus. OpenRC doesn't need netifrc for any
reason.
William,
the "push" for the use
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
Honestly, I'm not really sure why anyone would want to make stage3 less
functional than it already is but honestly net isn't something I'm ready
to give up just yet.
It isn't about ma
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:56:33AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
My issue with what we are currently doing is not whether we have a
default network provider in the stages or not, but it is just
--- /dev/null
+++
b/2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Title: Catalyst head changes
+Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
+Content-Type: text/plain
+Posted: 2014-01-31
+Revision: 1
+News-Item-Format: 1.0
+Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:14:53AM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
+After many years of stalled development, the catalyst repository is
+going to have major changes introduced to master in the next few days.
?the next few days? sounds a
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
+Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst
Display-If-Installed: >=dev-util/catalyst-
Matt,
my plan was to show this to anyone using catalyst. I believe this news
item
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Peter Stuge wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
+After many years of stalled development
I'm quite allergic to statements like this.
Remember that you may not really be representing everyone when you
express your own opinion - even if it is shared by many.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Here's v2 of the news item.
I tried to address the concern with showing this news item to anyone with
catalyst and not only running catalyst-. If anyone insists, I don't
mind restricting the news item to , in which case
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Here's v2 of the news item.
I tried to address the concern with showing this news item to anyone with
catalyst and not only running catalyst-. If anyone insists, I don&#
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
