-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gordon Malm wrote:
<snip a lot of exchanges> All the technical discussion on the above is perfectly fine, but the way the arguments are being presented and the tone used by both sides is getting arguments into a thin line from becoming flames. Please step back before turning this into another flame festival. > I guess the larger question in all this is why does a third party who has > demonstrated his anti-Hardened (and anti-Gentoo) slant on multiple occasions > define what goes in our PMS? It's not up to a 3rd party to define what will be or not in PMS. Any 3rd party is free to contribute to the discussion (within boundaries), but it's up to the PMs folks to reach agreements about PMS and, or if they can't, up to the Gentoo Council. > Gordon Malm (gengor) > - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkNG6IACgkQcAWygvVEyAKOrgCghGO8W2839jXMaMq9DN3DpWbM JJMAn0PhLDiKoBayr1juI48tzwa8j8Wc =EXnX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
