On Saturday, April 09, 2016 05:15:08 PM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:09:38 -0400
>
> waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> > > I never really got the mentality that using an initramfs is a
> > > burden.
> > >
> > One more piece of software that can go wrong. You have to
> >
> > mai
On Saturday, April 09, 2016 09:07:46 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:09 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I actually write my own initramfs because neither dracut not genkernel end
> > up with a convenient boot system.
> >
> > I have 2 disks, both encr
On Sunday, April 10, 2016 10:04:42 AM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 02:09:35 +0200
>
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > I actually write my own initramfs because neither dracut not
> > genkernel end up with a convenient boot system.
> >
> > I
On Monday, April 11, 2016 01:10:15 AM Raymond Jennings wrote:
> Please don't do this. I want my system left alone.
Please don't top-post, I want to have a logical flow of the text.
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:41 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Sunday, April 10, 201
On Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:30:07 PM Aaron Bauman wrote:
> # Aaron Bauman (30 Jun 2016)
> # Unpatched security vulnerability per bug #509920.
> # Removal in 30 days
> www-apps/egroupware
Why is this bug being used to treeclean egroupware?
Why is bug 461212 not being used to actually resolve t
On Thursday, July 07, 2016 06:37:09 AM Duncan wrote:
> J. Roeleveld posted on Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:22:57 +0200 as excerpted:
> > On Thursday, June 30, 2016 10:30:07 PM Aaron Bauman wrote:
> >> # Aaron Bauman (30 Jun 2016)
> >> # Unpatched security vulnerability per bug
On Wednesday, July 06, 2016 11:13:55 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:23:46 +0900 Aaron Bauman wrote:
.
> Please understand me correctly: I'm not blaming you or security
> team for this or that issue. But it looks like security team indeed
> needs to review some policies and
On Sunday, August 21, 2016 02:58:42 PM Pacho Ramos wrote:
> # Pacho Ramos (21 Aug 2016)
> # This was merged in systemd, if you want to keep it, take it a
> maintain it
> # splitted (#556734). Removal in a month.
> sys-boot/gummiboot
Why is this being tree-cleaned?
It still works and is likely to
On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 06:00:25 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Keeping up with the frequent Chromium releases is quite a chore.
> Recently, phajdan.jr has been slacking on the masked dev channel
> updates due a hardware problem, so I have been spending additional
> time on them.
>
> If there are
On December 14, 2016 2:40:45 PM GMT+01:00, Andrey Utkin
wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:00:25PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> Keeping up with the frequent Chromium releases is quite a chore.
>> Recently, phajdan.jr has been slacking on the masked dev channel
>> updates due a hardware problem,
Olav Vitters wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
>> As I said in an earlier email, Lennart Poettering claims that it does
>> not work. We are discussing some of the things necessary to make it
>work.
>
>Just to repeat:
>In this thread it was claimed that a separat
On Mon, December 17, 2012 22:31, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:03:40PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> Olav Vitters wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:29:26AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote:
>> >> As I said in an earlier email, Lennart Poettering cl
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 09:13:28 AM Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:21:36AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Mon, December 17, 2012 22:31, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 09:03:40PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > >> Olav Vitters
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 09:31:36 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:27:26 +0100
>
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 09:13:28 AM Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:21:36AM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 07:02:06 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
> > No one has proposed moving everything to /usr. At the minimum, we would
> > still have /etc and /var in /, as well as various mountpoints. If we do
> > move those to /usr, then
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:57:25 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:10:22 +0100
>
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 20, 2012 09:31:36 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:27:26 +0100
> > >
> &
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45 +0100
>
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:57:25 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Just let me know when you have to maintain a lot of such systemd
&
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:42:23 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:31:28 +0100
>
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
> > On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:02:34 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:24:45 +0100
> > >
> > > &
On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:51:09 AM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as
> > well.
>
> Just to be clea
On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:52:00 AM Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Friday, December 21, 2012 08:51:09 AM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld w
On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:38:36 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On 21/12/12 03:10 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> An init* needs to be kept in sync with the rest of the system as
> >> well.
> >
> >
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
>On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 12:48 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:42:23 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>> > On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:31:28 +0100
>> >
>> > "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>> > > On Friday, Dec
On Friday, December 21, 2012 10:21:02 AM William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Friday, December 21, 2012 09:38:36 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Ian Stakenvicius
wrote:
> > > > On 2
Dale wrote:
>J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> However, it is, in my opinion, a workaround for a problem that has
>> been forced upon me. As soon as eudev is stable enough, I will dump
>udev.
>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/441004
>> Strange, I use a current-stable version
On Friday, December 21, 2012 12:20:45 PM William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 06:36:05PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Friday, December 21, 2012 10:21:02 AM William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > >
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>
>> 2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò :
>>> I would say that we might want to review linux-firmware, and if the
>>> newest firmware _is_ there, just get rid of the split one.
>>>
>> That should be probably the best approach, to act
Samuli Suominen wrote:
>On 09/02/13 11:11, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2013/2/8 Diego Elio Pettenò :
>>>>> I would say that we might want t
On Thursday 14 February 2013 08:53:45 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 14.02.2013 08:26, schrieb Michael Weber:
> > On 02/14/2013 06:09 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> I need two things:
> >>
> >> 1. Users volunteering some time to keep this running
> >> 2. Agreement on a place to host tarballs no longer
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013, 14:59:21 schrieb Michael Mol:
>> On 05/18/2013 03:23 PM, Carlos Silva wrote:
>> > Is the real problem just the god damn unit/init files?! Damn, who
>cares
>> > about 2KiB files in the age of GiBs?! You can install 1000 of them
>that
>> > it w
(Late reply due to busy week, just want to clarify a small detail)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 16:34, Peter Stuge wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> I don't see how this will avoid the issue of a limited amount of
>> inodes.
>> That is what I usually run out of before the disk is
On Tue, May 21, 2013 09:03, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I don't like gnu info files. Neither me nor anyone I know can figure out
> how to drive info.
This reminded me of my experience with info-files. Don't know how long ago
it was that I used them as I find google to be a much more useful
resource.
B
On Sat, May 25, 2013 15:38, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:54:48 +0200
> Luca Barbato wrote:
>
>
> there's one option we forget about
> here though, EFI users can build a second smaller minimally adjusted
> defconfig kernel that ends up loading the default init system if they
> wish
On Sat, May 25, 2013 21:55, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 21:09:47 +0200
> "J. Roeleveld" wrote:
>
>> How will the stop/start part of services/init-scripts/... be done?
>
> Not sure what you mean here; if you keep init function the same as the
> init y
On Saturday, May 31, 2014 02:17:32 PM Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 31/05/14 05:47, Steven J. Long wrote:
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:57:01AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 27/05/14 08:34, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34
> >>>
> >>> Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 04:46:18 PM Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 03/06/14 16:40, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0300
> >
> > Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 03/06/14 16:20, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> >>> Ehm, no, version 0.9.23-r3 controls that with a systemd USE flag;
> >>
> >>
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 04:45:36 PM Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Samuli Suominen schrieb:
> > On 03/06/14 16:53, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> So, I get why you did it, but my concern is that when you tell
> >> portage that non-systemd users shouldn't use this package, portage
> >> helpfully
Hi All,
I am trying to create an ebuild for Egroupware 14.1. (released this month)
To find out the dependencies, I am going through the setup check and am stuck
with the following:
**
Checking PEAR pear.horde.org/Horde_Imap_Client (2.16.0) is installed: False
PEAR::Horde_Imap_Client is needed by
On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki
wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in gnome
> > and kde profiles?
> >
> > Could we add systemd subprofiles also to default/li
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:41:26 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08
>
> "J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
> > On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlic
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:46:20 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@. Only
> a few of them have a large number of bugs, many have just version bump
> requests. 953 packages have no bug open.
>
> Please consider adopting some of
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 04:51:35 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 14:35:20
>
> "J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
> > On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:46:20 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Right now, we have 1262 p
On Sunday, September 07, 2014 01:16:57 AM Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 07:15:53 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > On Sunday 31 August 2014 11:39:22 hasufell wrote:
> > > Martin Vaeth:
> > > > hasufell wrote:
> > >
On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 08:59:41 PM Andrew Savchenko wrote:
My last response to this, as it is getting too OT
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 17:51:46 +0200 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > It probably works, provided all your contacts also use it.
> > As long as the vast ma
On Sunday, September 07, 2014 05:57:57 PM Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 09/07/2014 17:04, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Joshua Kinard
wrote:
> >> As for Parallel builds, do you make make -jX? Or running concurrent
> >> emerges in different shells? I wasn't commenting a
On 11 May 2015 15:59:40 CEST, Rich Freeman wrote:
>On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, C Bergström
>wrote:
>> Sorry to shoot and run, but I think you're trying to tackle this
>> problem in the wrong way. The problem isn't to drop the mail. The
>> solution is to change email hosting providers. As a n
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 04:52:51 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 29/09/2015 16:29, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On 28/09/15 06:58 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> Also, we are dropping the use of the -O switch for mount/umount
> >> -a. This is being dropped because it is util-linux specific and
> >
On 1 October 2015 17:49:15 CEST, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ian Stakenvicius
>wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 01/10/15 09:41 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:13:09AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius
>>> wrote:
---
On 1 October 2015 17:49:15 CEST, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ian Stakenvicius
>wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 01/10/15 09:41 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:13:09AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius
>>> wrote:
---
48 matches
Mail list logo
