accidentally killed by
pressing the wrong key in Vim.
I can't resist. I think you mean '"not" after "system,"': "...*before*
they break the user's system, not after "
Regards,
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dev
t; This means you'll need to run revdep-rebuild after upgrading, otherwise
> you'll get problems from 3D just not working to packages being unable to
> find libGL.
>
If you make sure to re-emerge mesa immediately after the libdrm upgrade,
the revdep-rebuild is much less in
on about
packages in full releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Donnie
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDqjr2XVaO67S1rtsRAhlPAKCMvjj82U6sNPpVYsUOnKOsRwAF4QCgibKM
> Ccs1TnSQbXI66BVpf4P8Ed4=
> =NFr1
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
introduction.
The RFC is also available on-line at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~fmccor/devrel/DevrelBug.rfc.txt --- if you wish
to compare, the original version is present in the ~fmccor/devrel
directory too.
Regards,
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux
gards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc, devrel)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDxaBWQa6M3+I///cRAv/UAKCmOh2vFoZoAstFIOoynlYk5IhdFQCgntpt
XYfbsIWLAmbdu38ksgKdmP4=
=YDDI
-END PGP SIGNATURE
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 14:08 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> Ferris McCormick posted
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
> Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:04:19 +:
>
> > B. "Jurisdiction" --- why this is something for devrel to consider (policy
> > violation or wha
ug #118405 and the last draft can be found on my
devpage (http://dev.gentoo.org/~nattfodd).
Looks good so far.
Regards,
Alexandre
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc, devrel)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ver
TED]>
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD732hQa6M3+I///cRAnudAKCGKcN1v+EC1eWAL+JDKKcUCKs1qgCfU2Cq
MqMhBHNtNsm8xVa7IrMtTlU=
=aG5A
have triggered the bump.
By the way, I really like the proposal which triggered this discussion.
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD79mAQ
, and when I do that, I really want them to be identical. I
think if you have your no-docs-of-any-kind option, you get your wish as to
locally built packages, but if you really mean things like openoffice-bin,
I doubt that any openoffice user would want it with absolutely no
documentation.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, MIkey wrote:
Ferris McCormick wrote:
I
would also like to have them excluded from binary packages.
That can't be right can it? You mean, like openoffice-bin, or like the
ones you build yourself? I know that I often
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, MIkey wrote:
Ferris McCormick wrote:
I misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you meant "physically included
in the package," not "installed from a binary package." I just completely
read what loo
or, say,
FEATURES='-distcc ccache' MAKEOPTS='-j2'emerge ...
on some specific occasions, and it does what it looks like it should do.
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
too-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEMa8iQa6M3+I///cRApdNAKDQdMVanpvYqte2NFBGXCmlUBwOjgCgw9+
eveloper for those puzzled
by this.) So I am not sure of the proxy comment's practical effect.
I still think the intent is good and support it.
Regards,
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
t matter).
If the question doesn't mean anything to you, or if you use the default
rgb.txt, no response needed.
Thanks,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have not read this carefully. There is a lot to work through. At first
reading, I like it a lot.
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIG
it seems to me that the ebuild works because of a bug in portage,
and there should be no complaint if as a side effect of fixing this bug
the ebuild in question quit working.
If memory serves me, things like this have indeed happened. I can't
recall a specific, however.
Regards,
Ferris
ains. But we're nice about it. :)
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFElAsdQa6M3+I///cRAkw9AKCuLkwdVENA8Hy++xBOS76PLGPXywCfW977
N0
sparc project, I invite you to read about
the Architecture Testing program at
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/sparc/at/index.xml and consider if
you are interested in that.
Thangs again, and
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (
Exeunt, fighting.
>
Nice. I wish I'd thought of that. :)
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ing. Simply put, the gentoo-dev mailing list must be
> notified at least 14 days before the meeting itself.
>
> For more info on the Gentoo Council, feel free to browse our homepage:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) &
> bug-wrangler anymore. Was anyone successful to contact him, yet?
>
> V-Li
I am told he should be back sometime soon, like today. Apparently
someone is in contact with him.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (De
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think nominations are open. I nominate
rane
welp
zlin
I think I've spelt all of them correctly and that all three are are
qualified.
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'll try again. :)
I nominate
rane
welp
zlin
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9
ain):
>
> I nominate:
>
> dertobi123
> fmccor
>
>
OK, I'll accept, if only because I think generally people who are
nominated should accept.
> --
> Fabian Groffen
> Gentoo on a different level
> --
> gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
Rega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkhIL8AACgkQQ
t I may be a member of.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkhIMYQACgkQTE4/y7nJvasByACg24Z2Qw4OPMbLPAGwoRAG/8hG
> rswAn3E/B28l95e2rHTbnHX8SKgWfVM1
> =yVuz
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.o
008-
> > nominees.xml
> >
> >
> I'll provide a link in the next week or so. Most likely to a link to a
> text file in d.g.o/~fmccor/
> > - --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Roy Bamford
> > (NeddySeagoon) a member of
> > gentoo-ops
> &
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 09:28 +, Duncan wrote:
> Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 06
> Jun 2008 01:37:21 +:
>
> >> 2. As one of the first priorities will be setting policy for pending
> >>
I also nominate:
NeddySeagoon
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
that it describes council+policy. The
actual policy was established in 2005 in a vote by the developer
community. Thus, changes to the GLEP should be only to clarify actual
policy (and I don't know where it is written down. I remember the
vote, but don't know who controls the actual pol
m a councilor, I really don't care what
that is.
I'll listen to what you want for future EAPIs, but I don't think it's
council's job to decide.
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 09:38:17 +
Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 11:12:27 +0200
> "Piotr Jaroszyński" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
These people are posionous [1].
>
> Slightly ironic for me to suggest this, but...
>
> It is the gentoo-dev mailing list, restrict posting to gentoo devs
> (i.e. only people with a @gentoo.org email address) would make a lot of
> sense.
>
Not really. It's there for g
gt; I'm sure you could ask Freenode and the developer in question for on
> > the record statements, if you're interested.
> >
> I'd be careful, that is potentially libellous.
No, for two reasons. No one is named, and you can't libel anonymous.
Also if it's tr
list must be
> notified at least 14 days before the meeting itself.
>
> For more info on the Gentoo Council, feel free to browse our homepage:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (De
ge's maintainers) and
> perhaps pasting ChangeLog or advisory info in a comment.
> --
> gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
I doubt that this addresses what you are asking, but in case it is
useful,
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) &l
nearly so traumatic to the
system. I note that this is a minority view among those who have
discussed this.
Donnie,
I don't know if that clarifies anything or just makes things more
confusing. It's the best I can come up with.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <
#x27;s not really meant as a joke.
> --
> gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEY
he
CoC or
a major change to the CoC from last February, then all the more reason for
someone to
put it in the form of a GLEP just like any other consequential change.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
nd maintain it, we in fact already have
> something like this pointing at Freenode, it would be just a question
> of updating that alias and updating our docs with it. It would
> increase our independence from Freenode and make future network
> switching much easier should we ever decide it
Robin,
Please for
#gentoo-sparc
Thanks and regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I guess, do what seems right and
let us know what you did. The best way to do that is through a bug
usually. You might not find us on IRC when you need us, and we probably
won't read your mail. :)
Sorry for not helping,
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
No, not from Gentoo.
After some thought, for personal reasons I resign from devrel. It's
been enjoyable, and all my best to the devrel team.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Descr
ammer, Gentoo Lisp project
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
>
> http://www.faulhammer.org/>
Hooray!
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
useful
> to the user and that he doesn't want broken, and we should behave
> accordingly, but the triple emphasis of important, production, critical,
> seemed a bit undue for the lengths to which an ordinary user goes or the
> priority he reveals by his own actions. And i
thing should not go stable on sparc (more QA
issues than functional ones).
How, I wonder, would the variations here handle such a situation? I
don't think this situation is unique because arch developers are
sometimes going to have a different concept of "stable" than the package
developers do.
If this does not make sense, is off topic, or irrelevant feel free to
ignore it.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
nity section, but I
do find Wikipedia very useful even though I know it might be wrong. :)
> --
> Mark Loeser
> email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
> email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com
> web - http://www.halcy0n.com
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44
no management/
>
> it turns out this is a problem in a number of other organizations;
> hopefully Gentoo will get better at addressing them.
>
> -Alec
>
Interesting (and valid) point. Perhaps this argues for more (or more
active) mamagement.
> >
> > Best regards, Wulf
>
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
s"
[[ -e ${2} ]] && die "die target exists"
How does the user recover from that? I would become irate if a build
died without giving some useful indication the problem.
> c) keep it restricted to java eclasses
> d) something else
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:37 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> Many times upstream Java projects don't include build.xml files or
> >> proper build systems so we include build
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:50:47 +0100
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> > 'cp -i' will at least ask a question, and I find that marginally better
> > --- it's confusing, but at least it says something. But it seems to me
> > that if we hit this
De js. Piña Calderón
Abogado - Notario
Telfs: (809)532-5479
(809)481-4912
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
SeñoresFundacion Gentoo
La comunidad seguidora de
la filosofia del software libre, en Republica Dominicana,
package manager
> perspective people have done it in the past and possibly still do do
> it, and the spec doesn't forbid it.
>
For what it's worth, no eclass in the gentoo-x86/eclass tree sets EAPI.
I don't know about anyplace else.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick
s is better than the glep 55 proposal???
> b) new subdirectory like ebuilds/
Yuch.
> - we could drop extension all together so don't have to argue about
> it any more
> - more directory reads to get the list of ebuilds in a repository
> c) .ebuild in current d
ng.
>
> Daniel Black
>
I'll look at it for the trustees in a bit.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
this
information available where I can find it in case I need it.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it and
install it (when we require the user to fetch the source). At one
time, at least, the sun java distribution was like this, and as I said,
I think there are others.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
es. I am pretty sure that you are not the only
> one
> who's having those thoughts.
I've been a developer a bit over 5 years. We know the problems and are
working to fix them.
> --
> Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
> Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Qt/Sound/Sunrise]
and that's
> of course a decision you must make (recognizing that people do sometimes
> need a time away, ideally to return refreshed and revitalized, ready to
> take on new challenges), you did say you may be back if you see that some
> of these issues have been addressed. Based on that
you could always do it over the phone. :)
> It's good to know the requirements, including this one. Which is what I
> was asking in the original post, is it or isn't it. Apparently, it is,
> and anyone intending to become a developer can now deal with it as such.
>
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
short term, we are in reasonable shape. Longer term, we need to
recruit.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
enough info in the post as-
> is to do so.
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-762914.html
>
It's there for me if I should see
Gentoo subforum in LinuxQuestions.org
and a poll.
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree prog
for
download over dialup. If that is correct, we are looking at 12.5 hours
instead of 10 hours (about 25% increase, but 10 hours is a long time,
and I don't know that 12.5 hours is subjectively that much longer).
So, to answer William's original question, one way or another we should
pr
On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:12:17 -0500
Dale wrote:
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> >
> > If the 20MB is a real problem, I think the alternative is to have two
> > versions of the "minimal CD". Otherwise it seems to me that Gentoo is
> > discriminating against pe
for the pm
> support a certain eapi before requesting stable keywords for ebuilds
> using the new eapi, Collect problems of EAPI development like
> feature-freeze, late feature removals (due to implementation problems).
> Eventually develop a lightweight EAPI development model.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Tiziano
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 12:46 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:57 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
> > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & 4th
> > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
&
I nominate:
ssuominen
armin76
Perhaps others later.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I knew I wasn't done. I also nominate:
arfrever
calchan
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
dev-z...@gentoo.org
> GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e intent here is
the latter, but it speaks of them interchangeably it seems.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ble
to, but only developers should have commit access (actually, the
trustees can request limited commit access to any Foundation trustee or
officer, I believe).
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
Flames not required,
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
session. Although under your 'what if' scenario, we have a
council which does not take its responsibilities very seriously.)
> Note: Other trustees may have a different view of the world
>
I'm sure we all have different views of the world. But I generally
agree with wha
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 23:53 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2009.06.28 23:14, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:40:00 +0100
l, never count on common sense. Elected people rarely have any.
> If they do during the election, it disappears after taking their
> position. I think the vast majority of people here have seen that over
> the years.
>
> My $0.02 worth.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
not to let you down. Unless you were one of
> the ones who wanted to me lose. Then sorry, but I'm going to have fun
> disappointing you, by doing what is best for Gentoo.
>
> If you have any ideas on how you think the council should function or
> reform itself. Please start a new thread or email those who think will
> listen to those ideas. I'm open for some real change as long as it's
> for the the positive.
>
Thank you.
> So lets have some damn fun again !...@#$
> Thanks.
>
>
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI)
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e prepared
for a referral to the ombudsman or working with that particular devrel
member's own eccentricities (e.g., if you ask me, be prepared for very
long ("may I have 5 minutes please?") discussions on IRC; others prefer
to work with email, etc.).
If you are still with me, thank
s from council2005 are still around, and if
someone can make them anonymous (convert names to something like C1, C2,
etc.), I can take them and show what results STV would give, if you'd
like a controlled test.)
Anyone having better information than I have, please correct my mistakes
here.
&
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:11 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:26 +0000 Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | So the "glue" is rather easy; problem is the specific balloting
> | method. STV supports several protocols for selecting som
e line indication of
just which system(s) I am reporting on. If people want more information,
they can ask me or go to a summary page sparc maintains --- all my systems
are described there.
--
MfG, Matti Bickel
Homepage: http://www.rateu.de
Encrypted/Signed Email preferred
Regards,
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 20:24 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:11 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:26 +0000 Ferris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > | So the "glue" is rather easy; problem is the
o use such a process again,
it should move fairly but more quickly.
> Best regards,
> Stu
> --
> PS: Isn't it fascinating how different folks can live through the same
> events, but end up with different perspectives on it? :)
>
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
oid OO compiles enough it
> wasn't something I ever got around to looking into :)
> ~harring
I don't see how it can be valid, especially ferringb's example.
Enabling distcc doesn't mean the build will distribute; only that the
possibility is there. If you happen
rivate as the exception. This doesn't mean we always
observe said "policy", but we are aware of the issues. For example, I
refer you to ribosome's observation in the log at 20:57 and kloeri's
followup at 20:57 -- 58.
I should emphasize that I am speaking as an individual
fingerprint: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05
--[PinePGP]--------[end]--
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
encouraging people to commit
broken stuff.
How exactly does it do that?
Thanks,
Donnie
I thought I responded to rour mail, but it seems not to have gottten
through. I like youru idea. Let's try it.
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer
or raining on your parade; I have some sort of flu and am passing
it on.
Regards,
Feerris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5-ecc0.1.6 (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I spelled my name wrong. Bad keyboard, but that's tacky.
Apologies,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5-ecc0.1.6
here are nobody even
> using these specific ebuilds that are proposed for removal.
>
Regards,
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the problem on the bug, but
obviously will not keyword the "fixed" version, and we need the old
version until the package maintainer corrects the problem. Thus, we
have no control over any 5 month, 6 month, forever rule.
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
double ""
because otherwise, xelatex stops scanning at the space and tries to load
Charis (not "Charis SIL").)
Hope this is of interest,
Regards,
Ferris
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
--- texmf/tex/xelate
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I can also help with sqlite if no one else can (i.e., I can help
Seemant with it).
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-ecc01.6 (
d kloeri called
it blackmail. Whatever you call it, in business, issuing such an
ultimatum is one of the quickest ways to become unemployed.
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Regards,
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gent
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 00:35 +, George Prowse wrote:
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:30:32 -0500
> > Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:44 +, George Prowse wrote:
> Ferris McCormick wrote:
> >
> >>>>
> >>> As I recall, flameeyes made the statement to kloeri, and kloeri called
> >>> it blackmail. Whatever you call it, in business, issuing such a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Regards,
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-ecc01.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGF54eQa6M3+I///cRAnnyAJoCc6GDKmT1OzOf/qdEIBIoKCpzQgCgtl2Y
qCFW0a7Qw2ye+Mp0h
nage to maintain this spirit
> in the years to come.
>
> AfC
> Bangalore
>
Thanks for the kind words; positive posts are always welcome. :) I
believe it is very much our intent to "maintain this spirit [of
co-operation]".
Regards,
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
l topic at hand. For src_test I see things this way.
>
Welcome back to the real (Gentoo, that is) world. :) Good summary of
the situation, I think (although I've snipped it since everyone's read
it once.)
--- snip ---
> Just my 2 cents...
>
> --Dan
Regards,
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
anything you
like.
> lu
>
> --
>
> Luca Barbato
>
> Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
>
Regards,
--
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
