-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 4/3/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i dont see how anyone can be against this (unless you're a terrorist!), so
this is on track to be integrated as-is into the dev handbook Etiquette
section
Let's go one step further, and also link to it from the Social
Contract. Our social contract shouldn't just be between Gentoo and
our users. It should be amongst ourselves too.
Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I have replied elsewhere that I generally like this and agree with Stuart.
Now, there are some details to fill in. Devrel and infra have agreed that
when responsibilities overlap, neither group would act unilaterally.
Please see http://dev.gentoo.org/~fmccor/devrel/devrel-infra.txt (esp.
section II.) So, unless Mike's intent is to repudiate what I believe we
agreed to, you would have to read solar's document and the one I just
referenced together, so the fifth paragraph needs clarification.
As for the proxy comment, as has been noted elsewhere, whenever I or
anyone else commit something to the tree, it is very hard for anyone
to tell if I am doing it for someone else or not. So, say, it might look
unusual when I make a substantative change rather than an arch change for
something in dev-ruby, it has happened (at a ruby developer's request).
(I'm a sparc/devrel developer, not a package developer for those puzzled
by this.) So I am not sure of the proxy comment's practical effect.
I still think the intent is good and support it.
Regards,
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEMbe/Qa6M3+I///cRArEWAJ9Yu6xRuDTpvG8oKDAu3zEv0lUeQQCgrf9Y
qBPlpULGDpMEguWB85XO+EU=
=Mhtu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
