On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:05:58PM +1000, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 08/12/2017 08:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >> On 08/12/2017 03:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please provide some examples of recent in-place USE changes that
Hello,
The following packages are up for grabs:
sci-geosciences/gmapcatcher
dev-util/webstorm
Best regards,
Amy Liffey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 19:50:14 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> We have a pull request for the devmanual that will update the revision
> documentation; namely, when to create a new one:
>
> https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual.gentoo.org/pull/67
>
> The comments bring up an issue that I think can
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 12:12:39 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 08/13/2017 12:06 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > There is a down side you didn't talk about -- more work for the arch
> > teams and for us in terms of stabilizations.
> >
> > When we revbump, a new revision automatically gets ~ ke
Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's still a
> good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to see the
> proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo.
As far as technical documentation about how ebuilds work (the core of
Gent
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> I am sure
> that portage developers gnash their teeth at blockers stemming from
> PMS, but I wholeheartedly believe that Gentoo, PMS and Portage are
> all better off for it.
>
Honestly, I've yet to see any portage developers complaining abou
Bacula ebuilds uses some weird USE flags with mostly negative
logic ('do not build ..') coming from their build system.
With the actual major release (bacula-9.0.3) we should try to switch to
something more sane. I picked up the new flags from app-backup/bareos as
both ebuilds have a common anches
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:42:21 +
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's
> > still a good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to
> > see the proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo.
>
> As f
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:42 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
>
> I cannot explain why those who do portage development are not the PMS
> authors.
>
Have you considered asking them?
--
Rich
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:09:15 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> >
> > I am sure
> > that portage developers gnash their teeth at blockers stemming from
> > PMS, but I wholeheartedly believe that Gentoo, PMS and Portage are
> > all better off for it.
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500
Gordon Pettey wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen
> wrote:
>
> > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's
> > still a good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to
> > see the proposed change, and view
On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> Title: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula-9.0.3
> Author: Thomas Beierlein
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2017-08-14
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed:
> Until now Bacula ebuilds uses the follow
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
>
> Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is debate
> on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns the bug request and
> makes it invalid. Despite the need still existing, and PMS lacking
> anything on se
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
>>
>> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly'
>
> This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver.
>
>> * 'bacula-nodir' will be replaced by 'director' but with inve
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500
> Gordon Pettey wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's
> > > still a good effort with
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:20:26 -0700
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> wrote:
> >
> > Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is
> > debate on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns the bug
> > request and makes it invali
Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19)
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> >>
> >> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly'
> >
> > This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver.
True. See
On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
> Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19)
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly'
> > >
> >
On pon, 2017-08-14 at 18:39 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:20:26 -0700
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is
> > > debate on what
19 matches
Mail list logo
