On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote: > > Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is debate > on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns the bug request and > makes it invalid. Despite the need still existing, and PMS lacking > anything on sets. > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624300 > > Just the needs I have with portage are stalled, marked as invalid. No > discussion for inclusion in PMS. Like documenting sets.
Ah, well, that's the main mystery of this thread solved. Thanks. -- Rich
