On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:41:02 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> No I never meant broken depgraphs. Well for broken deps, repoman does
> not let you commit. If you use --force to workaround broken deps,
> well, then you get what you deserve.
No, apparently tomwij can get not only away with this (and
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:30:56 +0200
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> Yes, I am sorry for that; it didn't came to mind to unkeyword HPPA,
> because I planned to unkeyword the USE flags instead and have planned
> to have a bug filed, I'll pay more attention to not -f again in a
> hurry.
There is no "instead".
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 19/10/13 12:14 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 10/19/2013 12:10 PM, Panagiotis Christopoulos wrote:
>> On 10:43 Sat 19 Oct , Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>> On 10/19/2013 10:32 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: ...
x11-wm/fluxbox
>>> I'm not a develope
On 21/10/2013 09:43, Tom Wijsman wrote:
An alternative would probably be gerrit which vapier seems to be a fan
of. But we don't even have an ebuild.
Since I have just noticed this is Java, CC-ed us on the bug and this is
on my list; but given its size, I can't make any promises as to when we
wi
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:50:34 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:30:56 +0200
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> There is no "instead".
Why is there no "instead"?
> The default policy (did you read the devmanual yet?)
Which policy are you referring to? (Did you refer me to anything?)
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:32:10 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:41:02 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
> > No I never meant broken depgraphs. Well for broken deps, repoman
> > does not let you commit. If you use --force to workaround broken
> > deps, well, then you get what yo
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:32:03 +0200
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:50:34 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:30:56 +0200
> > Tom Wijsman wrote:
> >
> > There is no "instead".
>
> Why is there no "instead"?
"I planned to unkeyword the USE flags instead" - t
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:31:43 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> "I planned to unkeyword the USE flags instead" - this is wrong. The
> policy (see below for the link - you seem to have trouble finding it
> every time I point it out) is to drop keywords (that is entries in the
> KEYWORDS variable, see b
On 10/21/2013 02:32 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:41:02 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> No I never meant broken depgraphs. Well for broken deps, repoman does
>> not let you commit. If you use --force to workaround broken deps,
>> well, then you get what you deserve.
>
>
Imho we need a statement about systemd being the only supported option in the
news item as well (ay least for now).
Message d'origine
De : Pacho Ramos
Date :
A : gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc : gn...@gentoo.org
Objet : Re: [gentoo-dev] News item about Gnome 3.8
El sáb
Markos,
Markos Chandras wrote:
> This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. If you
> intend to make the game overlay and team a developer-only thing you
> are doing a great work.
Everything in the Gentoo project is per definition strictly
developer-only. I suppose that it's a fu
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> There is an alternative solution here; and that is to bring reviewed
> versions of them to the Portage tree or official games repository, and
> honor their contributions. That is a win-win situation for both of you.
I'm afraid that's too naive. :\
I have significant experienc
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Markos,
>
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. If you
>> intend to make the game overlay and team a developer-only thing you
>> are doing a great work.
>
> Everything in the Gentoo project is
Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. If you
> >> intend to make the game overlay and team a developer-only thing you
> >> are doing a great work.
> >
> > Everything in the Gentoo project is per definition strictly
> > developer-only. I suppose that i
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the stabilization of GNOME-3.8. Users are
> strongly encouraged to read the GNOME 3.8 Upgrade Guide to avoid any
> possible issues relating to the upgrade.
> Please read the Gnome 3.8 Upgrade Guide:
> http://wiki.gentoo.or
El mar, 22-10-2013 a las 08:34 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > We are pleased to announce the stabilization of GNOME-3.8. Users are
> > strongly encouraged to read the GNOME 3.8 Upgrade Guide to avoid any
> > possible issues relating to the upg
> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> Neither this version nor the one you posted in your previous message
>> is reasonable as a news item. A news item should be descriptive and
>> self-contained (at least to some degree). It's o.k. to include links
>> pointing to further information, b
17 matches
Mail list logo
