>>>>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> Neither this version nor the one you posted in your previous message >> is reasonable as a news item. A news item should be descriptive and >> self-contained (at least to some degree). It's o.k. to include links >> pointing to further information, but that shouldn't be the only >> contents.
> What is your suggestion? Include at least a short summary of the upgrade guide's key points in the news item. > Lets compare it with the 2.32 one that looks to were valid in the > past: That we had less than optimal news items in the past doesn't mean that we shouldn't do better now. Ulrich
