Ok, my bad. I screwed up. I changed something in cfengine, then rushed
off to a family dinner, and caused a couple of hours of bugzilla
badness because I didn't fully review my change.
Approximately:
2008/07/03 02h38 till 05h06.
The following bugs may have duplicate comments, or the various other
Robin H. Johnson a écrit :
Ok, my bad. I screwed up. I changed something in cfengine, then rushed
off to a family dinner, and caused a couple of hours of bugzilla
badness because I didn't fully review my change.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shit_happens :)
Everything should be back online in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) wrote:
>> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06
>>
>> Modified: ChangeLog
>> Added:reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild
>>
* Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080703 11:04]:
> Well thanks anyway for admitting your mistakes and fixing them. Such
> behavior is rare enough these days that you deserve to be commended for it.
ack ;)
--
Michael Hammer|<
On Thursday 03 July 2008 01:06:17 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> -r1 has this values:
>
> P=quassel-
> PN=quassel
> PV=
> PF=quassel--r1
> PVR=-r1 (was this the right variable name? I sincerely forgot)
PVR is right. You only forgot PR=r1.
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 01:10:27PM +0200, Michael Hammer wrote:
> * Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080703 11:04]:
> > Well thanks anyway for admitting your mistakes and fixing them. Such
> > behavior is rare enough these days that you deserve to be commended for it.
>
> ack ;)
++
After all y
On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:23:01 +0200
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +, Marijn Schouten (hkbst)
> > wrote:
> >> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06
> >>
> >> Mod
2008-07-01 07:30:01 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on,
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400:
>
> > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Its a good idea, but since our users don't always provide useful
> >> reports, it seems like we are
Hi fellow developers,
it seems I've run into a minor issue with fellow bug wrangler carlo
(who has been putting a lot of work into that, for which we should all
be grateful).
Carsten has a cut-and-paste message that he posts in comments to
version bump bug reports that he finds have been fi
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:16 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
If it is for software where I am also upstream (Audacious for example),
it does tend to annoy me when people try their utmost to file bug
reports before I commit my ebuild.
Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
> The time I can spend
> trawling upstream sites for new releases is limited.
Same here - I would never mind getting a 0-day bump request, since
someone else might have noticed before I did that a new version is
available.
> Just an idea:
> How about a metadata.xml ta
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:26:13AM +0100, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote:
> > 2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
> > version bump requests?
> Just an idea:
> How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are
> welcome?
> It's more of an indivi
On Friday 04 July 2008, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote:
> How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests are
> welcome?
People obviously don't care about what it says on the website, why should they
start looking into metadata.xml?
I think we should remove the useless restr
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
> 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
I guess like with most people it depends
a) If I'm already aware of the new version, or would
"Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 04 Jul 2008
00:26:13 +0100:
>> 2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early
>> version bump requests?
AFAIK, it has been at least informal policy to discourage bump requests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
| -
| 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
|
|
It's generally fine with me; though I would handle it differently
depending upon the situation.
For example, sometimes these version bumps require
I'd like to add a few words from the users perspective:
-
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
I hope developers are not annoyed - well, sometimes the words chosen are
maybe a bit too offensive.
I like these bump requests. I add myself as a CC and wait for
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 30-06-2008 17:35:08 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
How can you easily revert it in a profile?
You can set LDFLAGS="" in a subprofiles's make.defaults.
How elegant... but I guess I'll have no choice.
Shouldn't possible have a subprofile with compil
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:31 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
I am, and Marius said all the things that I would have said. :-)
One of the reasons that it depends
Le vendredi 04 juillet 2008 à 07:07 +0200, Hans de Graaff a écrit :
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:31 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
> > Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
>
> I am, and Marius sa
Hi,
"Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump
> requests are welcome? It's more of an individual developer
> preference, but that seems the right place for it.
This fixes a non-problem. Why overload metadata.xml with informat
22 matches
Mail list logo
