On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 02:31 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200 > Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
I am, and Marius said all the things that I would have said. :-) One of the reasons that it depends is also that my own involvement which packages varies. Some things I track closely including involvement with upstream, and then a 0-day bump can be a bit annoying since I'm already quite aware of the bump. Other packages I've only taken up because otherwise they would be without any maintainer, and I may only check them every 6 months or so. Getting any bump request for them (0-day or otherwise) is useful. I also thought that the idea behind discouragement of 0-day bump requests was to keep bugzilla a bit more uncluttered with bugs that should normally be closed in a very short time anyway. Kind regards, Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
