On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:23:01 +0200 "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 04:53:06PM +0000, Marijn Schouten (hkbst) > > wrote: > >> hkbst 08/06/28 16:53:06 > >> > >> Modified: ChangeLog > >> Added: reversion.patch drscheme-4.0.1.ebuild > >> drscheme-0.372-r1.ebuild > >> Log: > >> add new major version 4.0.1 and reversion latest ~ > >> (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.23-gentoo-r8 x86_64) > > ... > >> 1.1 dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch > >> file : > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&view=markup > >> plain: > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-scheme/drscheme/reversion.patch?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > > Why was reversion.patch committed directly to dev-scheme/drscheme > > instead of files/? > > > > Because it is a patch I would've liked to apply to some ebuilds, not > something I'm applying to sources. The tools won't let me keep it > uncommitted easily. Then put it in an overlay or something? -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
