On Dienstag, 30. September 2008, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> From my knowledge and experience with sunrise:
>
> some functions that dont need "|| die":
> epatch, econf, eqmake3, eqmake4
>
> some functions that need "|| die":
> emake, do*
>
> Afaik die wont work in a subshell independent of how it is c
Jeremy Olexa schrieb:
> Ben de Groot wrote:
>
>> So, can we have a nice little table of which functions die by themselves
>> and which ones need || die added in ebuilds? Please?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>
> A quick grep of /usr/lib/portage/bin clues you in that every function
> that is an external file d
Ben de Groot wrote:
So, can we have a nice little table of which functions die by themselves
and which ones need || die added in ebuilds? Please?
Thanks,
A quick grep of /usr/lib/portage/bin clues you in that every function
that is an external file does *not* die by itself. So, emake, do*,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 28/09/2008 в 20:24 +0200, Thomas Sachau пишет:
>> I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by
>> itself. Are there any
>> specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it
Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Вск, 28/09/2008 в 20:24 +0200, Thomas Sachau пишет:
>> I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by
>> itself.
>
> This || die is redundant. Personally I remove it in every package I
> touch and I suggest others do the same. People use our tre
В Вск, 28/09/2008 в 20:24 +0200, Thomas Sachau пишет:
> I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by
> itself. Are there any
> specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it fails?
> Or some other reason
> for this?
This || die is redundant. P
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> I see many ebuild that still use "econf || die", also econf should die by
> itself. Are there any
> specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it fails?
> Or some other reason
> for this?
My guess is that due to the general lack of consistency in w
