[EMAIL PROTECTED] or to where it currently goes via my ~/.forward.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpGzYT5s5Pa6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
er I don't know what do you mean with 'changeset tracking'.
I didn't mean that 'changeset tracking' is different from 'merge tracking'.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Finger
nd other distributed development-style SCMs, have changeset/merge
tracking features that are really helpful. Could someone who's used them
comment on this?
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6
a full dev/mentor and merged into trunk.
- Branches replacing today's various overlays for devs (or projects, etc) and
anyone else we might welcome on g.o infrastructure (given per-branch commit
permissions).
- Short-lived branches to replace things that are today package.masked.
- Branches to replace
r using fdo specs - menu files already support filtering
and 2) the main complaint against having everything in the menus is clutter,
and that's not as big a problem with e.g. filemanager context menus.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak
VN skip-deltas storage method.
Disclaimer, I haven't run any huge-repo benchmarks myself, just pointing to
possibly relevant data.
[1] http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2005-04/0518.shtml
[2] http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/skip-deltas
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
On Monday 27 March 2006 16:55, foser wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 00:03 +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
>
>
> > = Bugs overview (probably missed some): =
> >
> > #89870: long story, summary: .desktop files are installed in different
> > places. KDE only reads t
wouldn't be happy either (#89870 again). That's exactly why I want to hear
others' opinions and what people would like to see.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpJMOeaTUQ7R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 04 March 2006 18:00, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Saturday 04 March 2006 16:43, Dan Armak wrote:
> > If you're concerned about diskspace you can filter out /usr/share/doc
> > entirely, so users do have the choice. The problem here is that the docs
> > USE flag
out /usr/share/doc
entirely, so users do have the choice. The problem here is that the docs USE
flag is off by default. Making more packages use the flag would install less
docs. Has anyone actually complained that too many docs are installed by
default? It's true that some users/situati
st as I can run 'cvs up konqueror kmail', I want to
run 'repoman konqueror kmail' - because running repoman 100 times in a
package dir is slower than running it once in a category dir with 100
packages.
If this request makes sense I'll open a bug if you wan
> still at 3.5.0 and didn't get a verbump.
> Dan probably did a for pkg in ${PORTDIR}/kde-base/*; do echo
> "=kde-base/$pkg-3.5.1*"; done >> ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.mask or a
> variation on the theme, that's also why metadata.xml got listed, too.
Yeah... I&#
y case where the max version being blocked (7)
doesn't exist. But that doesn't stop one from understanding the < blocking
dep.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpddJLITyViD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 24 October 2005 19:24, Ferris McCormick wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:48 +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
> > Don't post such questions here. Go to the gentoo-user mailing list, the
> > forums, or irc. This list is for discussion of Gentoo development.
>
> Actually,
Don't post such questions here. Go to the gentoo-user mailing list, the
forums, or irc. This list is for discussion of Gentoo development.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9
ult in a way that would not cruft the base profiles for every local
> use flag.
Because implementing https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61732 would be a
lot more cool :-)
Besides, if the effect on portage's behavior is the same, what's the
difference?
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Li
; attention.
>
> Nnn! No Type1 bloat! :P
To preserve existing behavior we can use the type1 USE flag. The monolithic
xorg-x11 ebuild does that. The same can be done with truetype fonts.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gp
On Thursday 20 October 2005 21:48, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On 20/10/2005 21:16:47, Dan Armak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 October 2005 20:58, Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote:
> > > On 10/20/05, Dan Armak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > To sol
DE should depend on :-)
>
> Selected arbitrarily by the x11 team based on requirement, common use
> and prettiness factor. Probably font-misc-misc, font-bh-ttf,
> font-adobe-utopia-type1 and maybe some others that are brought to my
> attention.
Which other new font ebuilds were included in the monolithic xorg-x11 ebuild?
media-fonts/font-*?
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpEsH9UUQYhR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 20 October 2005 20:43, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> - gpg control packet
>
> Dan Armak wrote:
> | On Thursday 20 October 2005 17:28, Luca Barbato wrote:
> |>a useflag could solve the issue as well a all inclusive metaebuild for X.
> |
> | To solve this issue it w
On Thursday 20 October 2005 20:58, Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote:
> On 10/20/05, Dan Armak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To solve this issue it would have to be an on-by-default flag, i.e.
> > 'noxserver'. I know some people are strongly against nofoo flags.
&
n the
> metabuilds text.
Which ones? Selected how? I'm asking because I don't want to work too hard on
deciding which fonts KDE should depend on :-)
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgp2gseUnt2ln.pgp
Description: PGP signature
bs.
And we'll need to update the entire tree to depend on that instead of
virtual/x11.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpsblqYpO4Ie.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 20 October 2005 17:28, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Dan Armak wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 October 2005 09:11, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > To keep the current behaviour, the kde metaebuild (and gnome and the
> > other WMs) would have to depend on xorg-x11, which
On Thursday 20 October 2005 17:23, Mike Williams wrote:
> On Thursday 20 October 2005 14:26, Dan Armak wrote:
> > To keep the current behaviour, the kde metaebuild (and gnome and the
> > other WMs) would have to depend on xorg-x11, which strictly speaking is
> > unnecessary.
onger. The way I understood your metabuilds.txt, 'emerge xorg-x11 kde' would
result in an unusable system without any fonts at all...
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgp4odBqw3E5B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 05 August 2005 12:34, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 29 July 2005 15:56, Dan Armak wrote:
> > base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack
> > supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today,
> >
On Friday 29 July 2005 17:58, Duncan wrote:
> Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò posted
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
>
> on Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:11:46 +0200:
> > On Friday 29 July 2005 16:05, Dan Armak wrote:
> >> Anyway, the effective change would be
On Friday 29 July 2005 16:57, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 29 July 2005 15:56, Dan Armak wrote:
> > base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack
> > supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today,
> >
-applying
patches, which is the correct thing to do IMHO. Objections?
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgp3JxWxcL9Pi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t 2.0.x rev?
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgp60vvanNBxY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ly: net-misc/rdesktop
kde-base/ksirc, kde-base/kdenetwork
RDEPEND.only: dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL
kde-base/quanta, kde-base/kdewebdev
RDEPEND.only: kde-base/kfilereplace, kde-base/kimagemapeditor,
kde-base/klinkstatus, kde-base/kommander, kde-base/kxsldbg, app-text/htmltidy
--
Dan Armak
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 01:36, Sven Wegener wrote:
> Unused global flags:
> usepackagedmakefiles
Removed, even if the functionality comes back we won't be using a USE flag as
it triggers unnecessary rebuilds with emerge --newuse.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Pub
ugh
for some reason. Other than me, most people seem to prefer to override
src_unpack just to call epatch...
So if we ever get a chance to cleanup the existing kde3 eclasses they'll look
just like that, and might even share some code with the new kde4 eclasses
(which should be separate due t
On Saturday 02 July 2005 18:47, Duncan wrote:
> Dan Armak posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
>
> below, on Sat, 02 Jul 2005 15:33:34 +0300:
> > At least arts is going away with kde 3.x :-)
>
> I read the rumors on that about a year ago, I'd guess, and have
On Saturday 02 July 2005 14:43, foser wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 18:33 +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
> > > calling a function in a global scope is a bad idea. it leads to lots of
> > > unneccessary (and timely) computations
> >
> > Necessary in the case of kde spli
stall this
file would be nicer...
At least arts is going away with kde 3.x :-)
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpu82yBy3Wjv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
g bash (our current
> strategy) a lot harder (actually causing bash reimplementation)
You mean you're actually doing that for portage-cvs? I didn't know that. Does
'our current strategy' refer to using bash or to not using it?
Anyway, as far as portage goes, if we had version r
On Friday 01 July 2005 18:03, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:45:57 +0300
>
> Dan Armak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd rather signal failure to code outside the subshell by
> > touching a file in $T.
>
> The ${T} directory
way
> > to signal a failure, no?
>
> calling a function in a global scope is a bad idea. it leads to lots of
> unneccessary (and timely) computations
Necessary in the case of kde split ebuilds. Take a look at
kde-functions.eclass::deprange().
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer
On Friday 01 July 2005 16:56, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Dan Armak wrote: [Fri Jul 01 2005, 03:42:22AM EDT]
>
> > ...OK, so deprange() needs to signal errors out-of-band. Like setting a
> > KM_ERROR variable which causes the eclass to abort later on.
>
> Heh, doesn't
Sometimes we need to specify a minimal version or revision because something
depends on specific fixes made there and needs to force a qt upgrade.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpX6M6iKO26J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 01 July 2005 12:15, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 30 June 2005 23:11, Dan Armak wrote:
> > Instead of 'exit 1', qt_min_version should use die. I use that in
> > deprange and it does work inside $DEPEND.
>
> Wouldn't this be a good time to i
On Friday 01 July 2005 00:38, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Dan Armak wrote: [Thu Jun 30 2005, 05:11:10PM EDT]
>
> > Instead of 'exit 1', qt_min_version should use die. I use that in
> > deprange and it does work inside $DEPEND.
>
> Well, it's more visible, but
On Thursday 30 June 2005 23:36, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Dan Armak wrote: [Thu Jun 30 2005, 04:06:03PM EDT]
>
> > Because the function takes a parameter - the minimal version
> > required from which to start the list in the ||.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> > Any eve
then emerge the split ones. There are a
few hours in between with nothing installed, so it's good for an overnight
install. (You can do it for each monolithic package in turn.)
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.k
s that
> is put in the DEPEND?
Because the function takes a parameter - the minimal version required from
which to start the list in the ||.
Any everyone who thinks functions inside $DEPEND are iffy should look at
deprange() and deprange-dual()... /me hides
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer
disabling
visibility support in kde. (There was a separate bug in gcc itself which got
fixed, which may have confused some people...)
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpECtup7r5X8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Have been having trouble with the mailing lists...
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE)
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpKwfWYVHHcs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
49 matches
Mail list logo
