On Friday 01 July 2005 11:55, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 30/06/05, Olivier Crete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-30-06 at 15:09 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: > > > I'm sorry, yes, that's what I do in this case. > > > > > > Also, the eclass is in portage if anyone is so inclined to see how > > > harmless it really i > > > > Why not just use =qt-3.3 since qt3 probably wont have any new major > > release ? > > This would seem like the easiest option. Is there any reason not to do > it this way?
Sometimes we need to specify a minimal version or revision because something depends on specific fixes made there and needs to force a qt upgrade. -- Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951
pgpX6M6iKO26J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
