On pon, 2017-08-14 at 18:39 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:20:26 -0700
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is
> > > debate on what
On wto, 2017-08-15 at 06:55 +0200, tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
> Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19)
> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly'
> > >
> >
Quoting Rich Freeman (2017-08-15 00:29:19)
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> >>
> >> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly'
> >
> > This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver.
True. See
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:20:26 -0700
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
> wrote:
> >
> > Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is
> > debate on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns the bug
> > request and makes it invali
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500
> Gordon Pettey wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's
> > > still a good effort with
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
>>
>> * 'bacula-clientonly' becomes 'clientonly'
>
> This is still negative logic in disguise. clientonly = noserver.
>
>> * 'bacula-nodir' will be replaced by 'director' but with inve
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
>
> Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is debate
> on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns the bug request and
> makes it invalid. Despite the need still existing, and PMS lacking
> anything on se
On pon, 2017-08-14 at 21:58 +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> Title: Changing USE flags for >=app-backup/bacula-9.0.3
> Author: Thomas Beierlein
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Posted: 2017-08-14
> Revision: 1
> News-Item-Format: 1.0
> Display-If-Installed:
> Until now Bacula ebuilds uses the follow
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 09:55:02 -0500
Gordon Pettey wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Alexander Berntsen
> wrote:
>
> > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's
> > still a good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to
> > see the proposed change, and view
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:09:15 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> >
> > I am sure
> > that portage developers gnash their teeth at blockers stemming from
> > PMS, but I wholeheartedly believe that Gentoo, PMS and Portage are
> > all better off for it.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:42 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
>
> I cannot explain why those who do portage development are not the PMS
> authors.
>
Have you considered asking them?
--
Rich
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 18:42:21 +
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> > While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's
> > still a good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to
> > see the proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo.
>
> As f
Bacula ebuilds uses some weird USE flags with mostly negative
logic ('do not build ..') coming from their build system.
With the actual major release (bacula-9.0.3) we should try to switch to
something more sane. I picked up the new flags from app-backup/bareos as
both ebuilds have a common anches
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> I am sure
> that portage developers gnash their teeth at blockers stemming from
> PMS, but I wholeheartedly believe that Gentoo, PMS and Portage are
> all better off for it.
>
Honestly, I've yet to see any portage developers complaining abou
Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> While the PMS perhaps hasn't been an unequivocal success, it's still a
> good effort with some success. I would be disappointed to see the
> proposed change, and view it as a bad sign for Gentoo.
As far as technical documentation about how ebuilds work (the core of
Gent
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 12:12:39 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 08/13/2017 12:06 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > There is a down side you didn't talk about -- more work for the arch
> > teams and for us in terms of stabilizations.
> >
> > When we revbump, a new revision automatically gets ~ ke
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 19:50:14 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> We have a pull request for the devmanual that will update the revision
> documentation; namely, when to create a new one:
>
> https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual.gentoo.org/pull/67
>
> The comments bring up an issue that I think can
Hello,
The following packages are up for grabs:
sci-geosciences/gmapcatcher
dev-util/webstorm
Best regards,
Amy Liffey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:05:58PM +1000, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 08/12/2017 08:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >> On 08/12/2017 03:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please provide some examples of recent in-place USE changes that
19 matches
Mail list logo
