Ulrich Mueller a écrit :
More translations are welcome.
en: The www-plugins category contains plugins for Web browsers.
de: Die Kategorie www-plugins enthält Plugins für Webbrowser.
fr: Cette catégorie contient des plugins pour navigateurs Web.
Cheers,
Rémi
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>>> net-www/libflashsupport -> www-plugins/libflashsupport
>>
>> media-libs?
> Not sure, it's a browser plugin first, media-lib second ;)
No strong opinion about this one. It has no reverse dependencies,
therefore it's a plugin?
Is
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>
>> Why is it inappropriate to discuss the poor UI, and implementation of
>> software we use especially in open source? Maybe if we're closed to
>> valid argument against poor methodology we can fail like everyone
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> Why is it inappropriate to discuss the poor UI, and implementation of
> software we use especially in open source? Maybe if we're closed to
> valid argument against poor methodology we can fail like everyone else
> who develops closed minded
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>
>> I think it's best as a general rule to NEVER _EVER_ under any
>> circumstances emulate paludis.
>>
>
> While I'm not personally a fan of paludis, it doesn't help anyone to post crap
> like that to any mailing list. Please take it elsewhere.
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> I think it's best as a general rule to NEVER _EVER_ under any
> circumstances emulate paludis.
While I'm not personally a fan of paludis, it doesn't help anyone to post crap
like that to any mailing list. Please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
--
Andrew Gaffney
Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 18:12:09 Thilo Bangert wrote:
>
>>> 'guess'. Like how you have to guess what use flags are really being
>>> used for the package in question, because it doesn't tell you?
>>>
>> i'd like to ask the developers of package managers to stand
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-04-05 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-emulation/vmware-esx-console2009-04-01 12:24:08 ikelos
dev-haskell/hs-plugins 2009-04-05 17:07:51 kolmodin
dev-java/jdbc2-p
On Saturday 04 April 2009 18:12:09 Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > 'guess'. Like how you have to guess what use flags are really being
> > used for the package in question, because it doesn't tell you?
>
> i'd like to ask the developers of package managers to standardize this.
> having --info be the same
On Sunday 05 April 2009 10:26:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 23:58:04 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > get a *working* implementation first and *then* worry about specing
> > it. once you have something running with portage, the spec should
> > fall naturally out. previous multilib
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 23:58:04 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> get a *working* implementation first and *then* worry about specing
> it. once you have something running with portage, the spec should
> fall naturally out. previous multilib methods attempted to spec
> things out without any real code an
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Peter Volkov wrote:
>> net-www/gnash -> www-plugins/gnash
>
> "Gnash is a GNU Flash movie player." May be media-video then?
>
It's a browser plugin first, "movie player" second. Just like totem is
a movie player first, browser plugin second.
>
On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:07:37 +0200
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Tiziano Müller schrieb:
> >> With this, i would also like to see any
> >> changes that need an EAPI to get into EAPI-3.
> > No. Won't happen.
> >
>
> Can you also explain your statement?
EAPI-3 is closed for new features. We want it imp
Tiziano Müller schrieb:
> Am Sonntag, den 05.04.2009, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
>> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
>>> On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:59:22 Thomas Sachau wrote:
i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support
within our tree and package managers. From
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 09:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller пишет:
> Is the following a reasonable scheme?
>
> net-www/adobesvg -> www-plugins/adobesvg
This one probably should be removed from the tree:
http://www.adobe.com/svg/eol.html
> net-www/gnash-> www-plugins/g
Mike Frysinger posted
200904050401.19301.vap...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 05 Apr
2009 04:01:18 -0400:
> what you've read/quoted matters at the expansion step, but that isnt
> what i'm talking about. i'm pointing out that the expansion is lost by
> assigning through the variable. thu
Am Sonntag, den 05.04.2009, 10:18 +0200 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> > On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:59:22 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >> i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support
> >> within our tree and package managers. From what i know, there are main
On 04-04-2009 23:53:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 13:17:56 Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote:
> > grobian 09/04/04 17:17:56
> >
> > Modified: toolchain-funcs.eclass
> > Log:
> > Add support for all Prefix arches, in particular for gen_usr_ld_script,
On Sunday 05 April 2009 04:18:34 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> > On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:59:22 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >> i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support
> >> within our tree and package managers. From what i know, there are mainly
> >> 2
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:59:22 Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support
>> within our tree and package managers. From what i know, there are mainly 2
>> different ideas:
>>
>> 1. Do the main stuff in the package mana
On Sunday 05 April 2009 03:49:52 Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted
> >> + local sources="$@"
> >
> > this doesnt do what you think it does. it's the same as "$*" which
> > means this function does not handle quoted arguments properly.
>
> ??
>
> I'm confused. Maybe you meant something diffe
Hi,
Christian Faulhammer :
> Repost of news item as I forgot to cc the PR project. Commit
> postponed by one day.
Forgot to attach the actual news item. Gnah.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://gentoo.faulh
Mike Frysinger posted
200904042353.30988.vap...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sat, 04 Apr
2009 23:53:29 -0400:
>> +local sources="$@"
>
> this doesnt do what you think it does. it's the same as "$*" which
> means this function does not handle quoted arguments properly.
??
I'm confused.
On 04-04-2009 18:49:50 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > + # killing these two on OSX/Intel will disable SSE, resulting in failing
> > + # compilations, as the headers expect SSE to be enabled (Apple knows
> > what
> > + # hardware they run on afterall, don't they?)
> > + [[ ${CHOST} == i?86-app
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, I wrote:
> Since most of the stuff in net-www seems to be browser plugins,
> we could create www-plugins.
Is the following a reasonable scheme?
net-www/adobesvg -> www-plugins/adobesvg
net-www/awstats -> www-misc/awstats
net-www/di
25 matches
Mail list logo
