>>>>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, I wrote: > Since most of the stuff in net-www seems to be browser plugins, > we could create www-plugins.
Is the following a reasonable scheme? net-www/adobesvg -> www-plugins/adobesvg net-www/awstats -> www-misc/awstats net-www/diamondx -> www-plugins/diamondx net-www/gecko-mediaplayer -> www-plugins/gecko-mediaplayer net-www/gnash -> www-plugins/gnash net-www/kaffeine-mozilla-plugin -> www-plugins/kaffeine-mozilla-plugin net-www/libflashsupport -> www-plugins/libflashsupport net-www/moonlight -> www-plugins/moonlight net-www/mozplugger -> www-plugins/mozplugger net-www/mplayerplug-in -> www-plugins/mplayerplug-in net-www/netscape-flash -> www-plugins/adobe-flash net-www/nspluginwrapper -> www-plugins/nspluginwrapper net-www/swfdec-mozilla -> www-plugins/swfdec-mozilla net-www/vdradmin-am -> www-misc/vdradmin-am net-www/xxv -> www-misc/xxv Ulrich
