>>>>> On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:

>>>   net-www/libflashsupport          -> www-plugins/libflashsupport
>> 
>> media-libs?

> Not sure, it's a browser plugin first, media-lib second ;)

No strong opinion about this one. It has no reverse dependencies,
therefore it's a plugin?


Is there agreement that there should be a www-plugins category? Then
I'll create it and open a tracker bug for the package moves. The moves
should be relatively easy since there are no reverse dependencies
except for one package (net-www/xxv).


Is the following description for the category metadata O.K.?
More translations are welcome.

en: The www-plugins category contains plugins for Web browsers.
de: Die Kategorie www-plugins enthält Plugins für Webbrowser.

Ulrich

Reply via email to