On Friday 14 March 2008 18:16:15 Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> Then, we'll see how long it will stay open, just one evidence here:
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125728 :)
Uhh.. We can do better than that...
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1343
Seriously though.. if someone had a pro
I don't really want CVS access neither I care. What I want is just
fixing bugs. I'll try to file a huge bug on all the broken RDEPENDs
I'll found. I'll try to find a free slot during the end of the next
week for the hunting.
Then, we'll see how long it will stay open, just one evidence here:
http:/
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I've read Gentoo's new dev announcements about monkeys and paper
> weights. People with a couple of small open-source projects. The
> monkeys and paper weights get CVS rights. Then the chief architect of
> Sabayon is scotched over bugzilla output? Please. That smells
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 10:09 +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Natanael Copa wrote:
> > So since I build a distro where size does matter (uclibc) I realised
> > that even if I submit bugs for broken RDEPEND, there will never be an
> > end to those bug reports. Looking at this thread, it seems i was rig
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:20:15 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> David Leverton a écrit :
> > Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that
> > ebuilds can be updated now, instead of suddenly all at once as soon as the
> > new eclass is committed?
>
> Good idea, I'll see what I ca
David Leverton kirjoitti:
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:14:39 Petteri Räty wrote:
David Leverton kirjoitti:
Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that
ebuilds can be updated now, instead of suddenly all at once as soon as
the new eclass is committed?
And break a bunch
I've haven't finished reading this thread so excuse if some points here
have been written already.
1. You think that because you work everyday with gentoo on your own
variant should automatically grant you CVS access. This is _not_
possible. It has already been said, the only way to get access CV
David Leverton a écrit :
On Friday 14 March 2008 07:14:23 Rémi Cardona wrote:
- the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
_games_eclass_ is one of those.
Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:14:39 Petteri Räty wrote:
> David Leverton kirjoitti:
> > Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that
> > ebuilds can be updated now, instead of suddenly all at once as soon as
> > the new eclass is committed?
>
> And break a bunch of ebuilds t
Rémi Cardona kirjoitti:
This is where I kindly request the help of fellow Gentoo devs and PM
developers :
- the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple inherits,
make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The _games_eclass_ is
one of those.
I only found two ebuilds to
David Leverton kirjoitti:
On Friday 14 March 2008 07:14:23 Rémi Cardona wrote:
- the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
_games_eclass_ is one of those.
Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the
On Friday 14 March 2008 07:14:23 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> - the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
> inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
> _games_eclass_ is one of those.
Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that
ebuilds
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you remove from that list vlc, pidgin and celestia which are false
> > positives, that leaves us:
>
> Why are they false positives? They include the gnome2 eclass and other
> stuff, I guess they'll be affected too.
Denis Dupeyron a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
_games_eclass_ is one of those.
[...]
*Please* review these eclass
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 14 Mar 2008
00:32:47 +:
> It looks like way too many people don't understand EAPI or PMS. In the
> interests of reducing the amount of noise these people make whenever
> anyone mentions either, I give you t
Petteri Räty schrieb:
solar reported that he had ebuild submissions blindly using EAPI=1 so
we hopefully made the text better reflect that it should not be used
unless absolutely needed.
Regards,
Petteri
# Eclasses will test for this variable if they need to use EAPI > 0 features.
-# Ebuilds
Natanael Copa wrote:
So since I build a distro where size does matter (uclibc) I realised
that even if I submit bugs for broken RDEPEND, there will never be an
end to those bug reports. Looking at this thread, it seems i was right.
I wonder what you are looking at :(. You've been told by multi
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
> inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
> _games_eclass_ is one of those.
[...]
> *Please* review these eclasses because with a simp
Hi folks,
During the past few weeks, I've been working on fixing and improving the
Gnome2 eclasses wrt bug #155993. We plan on pushing these eclasses to
portage before the Great Gnome 2.22 Unmask so that users can start
benefiting from the improvements during the upgrade to 2.22.
URL :
http
Hi all,
Here is the summary from today's council meeting. The complete log will
show up at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ shortly.
Thanks,
Donnie
Roll call
=
(here, proxy [by whom] or slacker?)
amnehere
betelgeuse here
dberkholz slacker [39 minutes late]
flameeyes h
20 matches
Mail list logo
