Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.3.0 RC2

Checking in the generated code and only conditionally running thrift would make checking this much easier. On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > You need thrift 0.7 > https://github.com/Parquet/parquet-mr/wiki/Developer-documentation > We should add a mention of this. > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.3.0 RC2

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Blue wrote: > In the mean time, if you take a look at the .travis.yml file, you can see > the preparation steps used to run CI jobs. That's what I usually point > people at instead of maintaining it in two places, but I agree that > shouldn't be the solution.

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Myriad for Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > @Adam and @Ted, like any new incubator projects coming we always check > if you need user@ so early in the process? > Would probably better to have all discussion in dev@ early in incubation. > Henry, This is a good question to ask (and I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.3.0 RC2

OK. I will change my vote to +1. The sha that Brock demonstrates is the same one that I saw when I was checking sums. I would *strongly* encourage the project to improve things before the next release by: - fix the sha has to not be compressed. This is unconventional and thus not a good thing.

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Myriad for Apache Incubator

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > I am personally in favor of adding Luciano Resende to the Nominated Mentors > list (the more the merrier, right?), but I want to get approval from the > other mentors/committers before nominating him in the proposal. > +1 I don't think th

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Myriad for Apache Incubator

Sound right to me. Ben? Would you like to do the honors? Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 21, 2015, at 15:12, Luciano Resende wrote: > > Discussion has died down, and we had only positive feedback for the > proposal. Should we start a formal vote ? > >> On Wed, Feb 18,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 22, 2015, at 8:24, Aditya wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). > >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 11:08 PM, jan i wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, February 22, 2015, Mohit Soni wrote: >>> >>> Definitely a +1 >> >> +1 (binding) >> rgds >> jan i >> >>> >>> >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

7 days was chosen to be conservative. I advised Adam not to hurry the vote. On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 10:04 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Just curious - why 7 days instead of the standard 72 hour window. > > Either way, +1, good luck with incubation. > > John > > On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 12:35:57 AM

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Aurora from the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Monday, February 23, 2015, Jake Farrell wrote: > > > This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Aurora > > has approved on the dev list with 26 positive votes (12 PPMC (4 from IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Accept Myriad into the Apache Incubator

So we will see more to report when it does make it in. Some good, some bad. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:01 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Oh ok, because of that you can't make it to this month's report ;-) > > On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 6:16:25 PM Ted Dunning > wrote: > &g

Re: [Fwd: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Singa for Apache Incubator]

Thejas, Please add me as a mentor if it helps to have diversity. I have enormous trust based on previous experience with him that Alan Gates would act as a highly impartial and effective mentor, but would be happy to help if there is a concern that could be addressed by having another mentor from

Re: [ROUGH DRAFT] March 2015 Report

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Unfortunately I've had some personal issues pop up in the last day > or so that need my attention and I won't be able to finish up the remaining > areas. If someone else can pick up those spots it would be great. > John, can you point to w

Re: [ROUGH DRAFT] March 2015 Report

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > I'm expecting to provide a lot of help for you next month, Ted, when > you'll be > the last line of defense instead of Roman. I'm glad we've been able get a > head start -- it should make next month easier! > I am going to need it. Than

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

>> storage, to handle large training data. > >> Specifically, we store the training data (e.g., images or raw features > of > >> images) in HDFS, then (pre-)fetch them online. > >> We will also explore integration with Hadoop's Yarn and Apache Mesos > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Groovy Incubation proposal

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > * several writers of documentation (without committer privileges) > * one or two creators of graphics (icons, or whatever, without > committer privileges) > * one or more organizations providing hosting services, and the like > This

Re: Wave community may need our help

Upayavira, Mind if I add your comment to the wave report? On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Upayavira wrote: > Apologies for missing the report. > > My impression also is that Wave will not, ever, make graduation, and > should seek an alternative home. > > There’s still some benefit to the pro

Re: Wave community may need our help

Right. Brain not functioning apparently. Yes. Adding this to the incubator report is what I mean. On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > Upayavira, > > > > Mind if I add your comment to

Re: Wave community may need our help

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > > Hi Roman, > > > > you might have noticed, that one of the mentors (me) were actively > > asking for this report. I simply forgot to sign it, which does not > > happen oft

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > +1 (binding) from me! :) G’luck! > > ++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief Architect > Instrument Software and Science Da

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.1.0-incubating

+1 binding Downloaded the artifacts and checked signatures and hashes. For the tar file, I did the following: - DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE seem correct. - I ran rat via the verify goal. I believe that this will check all files for licenses and check all licenses on dependencies - inspected

Re: [PROPOSAL] Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer

Very cool. There is a link in the proposal that seems no longer to be live. On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > One instance of our web services can be found at: > http://cmacws.jpl.nasa.gov:8080/cmac/ >

Re: [POLL] Using this list to discuss pTLP proposals, ok?

Let's try discussing them here and see how it goes. If something breaks in that model, we will have something to fix. Until then, we don't have anything to fix so we might as well try it. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Bertrand De

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

OK. Snagged the ID. I can change the email address to priv...@incubator.apache.org whenever needed. In the meantime, I will send the credentials to private@ On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > +1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Mar 23, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

Done. Credentials sent to IPMC private list. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > As a big-time user of @ASF... twitter accounts, I think it's a great idea! > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:05PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > > > while trying to spread the good new

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

eASF right now and I think this > way needs to be promoted for all the @ASFxxx accounts. > > Any objections? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > Done. > > > > Credentials sent to IPMC private list. >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer

y. > > Thanks, > -Lei > > > On 3/23/15, 1:24 PM, "Pan, Lei (398K)" wrote: > > >I will fix it a little later today and let you know. > > > >Thanks, > >-Lei > > > >On Mar 23, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Ted Dunning > >mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

I am committing to just that for now. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:07, jan i wrote: > > But if someone is committing to maintaining @ASFIncubator I am happy with > that. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

Roman is the former vp. And I set up ASF Incubator yesterday and will set up ApacheIncubator today. Then we can hash out which we want to use and how. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2015, at 5:51, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Roman, as VP, do you want to start setting this up?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating

Why have there been three release votes on Slider this month (0.70, 0.70.0 and 0.70.1) ? On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > +1 binding > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Gour Saha wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.1-

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Tim Williams wrote: > > Roman, as VP, do you want to start setting this up? > > "...as VP..."? that creates an odd, undesirable, implication. :) No big deal. Just a way of picking one person out of the crowd. And it is already done anyway.

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Just my 2 cents - "asfincubator" is preferable to "apacheincubator" in > 1) clarity ("apache" alone is less clear) and 2) shorter, and saving > characters on twitter is important. > The counter argument is that outsiders will not have a cl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating

(SLIDER-815 and > SLIDER-814) which are fixed in this release. > > -Gour > > On 3/24/15, 9:50 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > > >Why have there been three release votes on Slider this month (0.70, 0.70.0 > >and 0.70.1) ? > > > > > > > >O

Re: [Groovy] Next steps...

I usually start with mentor moderation and try to transition quickly to committers. On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Jake Farrell wrote: > depends, if its private@ the mods control the subscription > > -Jake > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25,

Re: [GROOVY] mailing lists are ready, see you there!

your loop is a fine solution. Just test it carefully ahead of time. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I think you can write a script to do a call to > echo "subscribe" | mailx -s subscribe dev-subscribe-john= > host.dom...@groovy.incubator.apache.org > via the l

Re: ASFIncubator now managed via TweetDeck

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > is who (and by extension what email address) should > the master ASFxxx account be associated with. I see > two alternatives here: > * ASF Infra team collectively owns it > * Whoever controls @TheASF owns it > > Which one do you g

Re: Podling report reminders didn't go out

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > I've contemplated writing a quickie Incubator-specific Python version which > fetches report_due_*.txt over http: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/report_due_1.txt > > I think those report_due_*.txt file

Re: ASFIncubator now managed via TweetDeck

I think that David's plan is considerably better. The key is the access to the over-ride keys. On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:08 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > > > The above makes a really nice, security-conscious scheme > > that I would love to champion among various PMCs > > and suggest that we doc

Re: Report for April mostly done

General section looks grand. We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz. I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time. Who knows more about the others? Andrei, Konstantin, Suresh are the respective shepherds? Any thoughts? On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 8

Re: File podling reports next month rather than late

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Thanks again to everyone who has contributed towards another strong report > from the Incubator this month -- I'm confident that we'll meet the same > standards next month but with smoother running. > Thanks for the help Marvin. The proce

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

Roman, Could you comment on the potential issue that this proposal is only offering up the distributed object storage. The problem that might arise with this is that by offering up a particular specialized core capability, other projects may find it difficult to use this core capability which wou

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In particular, a glance to see whether there is any hygiene around licensing is an important question. Many projects in the world at large have no good record of who write the code but still imagine that they can change the licensing.

Re: [DISCUSS] Geode Incubation proposal

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > There is no mention of such an item under "known risks" or the > "crypotography" section of the proposal > > so what's this "export" stuff about (assuming the license thing is the > evaluation license)? > > Sorry for not being more expl

Re: Report for April mostly done

At this point, you should move to reporting in May. On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ian C wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > > General section looks grand. > > > > We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz. &

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

Could we have some discussion on this first? Jumping to a vote may be a bit premature (or not ... thus the need to discuss). I have some questions myself that would prevent me from being able to support the issue right now. Presumably these can all be resolved, but it is hard to do so under a 72

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

ently conducted over google hangouts, and > notes brought back to the dev list. No official decisions are being carried > out without being put to the list and anyone is welcome to attend. > > -Jake > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > &

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Atlas for Data Governance on Hadoop

I hate to be a pissant, but why does it follow that new code has to be implemented in private? Building community can start with the first semi-colon. It doesn't have to wait until the code is frozen. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > On

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Atlas for Data Governance on Hadoop

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > It's extremely hard to come to Apache when you have a vague idea and no > code. > > The Incubator is simply too high a bar for folks who just want to play > with an idea and aren't sure where it is heading. > > So, I wouldn't hold it aga

Re: [VOTE} Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer

+1 (binding) On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Whitehall, Kim D (398M) < kim.d.whiteh...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > +1 from me too! > Best regards > Kim > This email was sent from a mobile device. Please excuse typos and/or > brevity. > > > On Apr 19, 2015, at 11:47 AM, "jan i" wrote: > > > >> On

Re: Apache Ignite twitter

Just to clarify the situation for people, somebody claiming to represent the Apache Ignite (incubating) project just retweeted a very sexist and political tweet. https://twitter.com/atDoyleFM/status/589926665486082050 This is highly inappropriate for an ASF branded account. I will be working wit

Re: [VOTE] Accept Geode into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > + 1 (binding) > > Suresh > > > On Apr 20, 2015, at 1:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > Following the discussion earlier in the thread: > > http://s.apache.org/Oxt > > > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode > > as a

Re: Apache Ignite twitter

Excellent answer. Thanks. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I am one of the project mentors and I'd like to close the loop on the > topic. > > The twit went out inadvertently because of the mishaps with the software > setup: basically wrong handle got used. The twit

Re: Apache Ignite twitter

The same person was involved by saying "did that, here's what to do to avoid it". That is, he was part of the solution this time. Exemplary performance I would say. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 22, 2015, at 2:47, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > Ok, that's true, but the same person has been invol

Re: File podling reports next month rather than late

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > To recap: while Ted has the privilege of editing the narrative as IPMC > Chair, the Incubator is a big place and the top section is at its best > when it is a collaborative, community effort. Please feel free to add > a bullet point or two

Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It requires that the > project be run according to > > the Apache Way which includes being open to any viewpoint brought to the > project, regardless > > of the source. Furthermore, the

Re: updating the incubator website

Depending on your preferences, you can also switch to an SVN-only or git-only workflow which avoids the CMS applet entirely. You will have to set up your own preview method. Some projects use an alternative thread (typically "gh-pages") to store the site content without the project sources. This

Re: updating the incubator website

who use it as well. > > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > > > That sounds interesting. > > Could you point me to a project that has implemented such a workflow? > > > > > On May 3, 2015, at 17:11, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Mysos Incubation proposal

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Dave Lester wrote: > Mysos is an Apache Mesos framework That is a very confusing name (to me) at least.

Re: [DISCUSS] Mysos Incubation proposal

mmunity. > > - Henry > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Dave Lester wrote: > > > >> Mysos is an Apache Mesos framework > > > > > > That is a very confusing name (to me) at least. > > -

Re: JavaX

I think it might help if we get a bit on the same page. Apache doesn't take over projects. Apache provides a framework for people involved in a project to create good releases and to build community. Check out resources on the web. I just found this, for instance, which is by an Apache member.

Re: Integrating JavaX

Stefan, Here is the email that I sent to general@ a few days ago. Didn't realize that you weren't subscribed. Note that I have bcc'ed the community development list and added general@incubator.apache.org We should continue the discussion there. You might like to subscribe so that replies made

Re: [DRAFT] May 2015 Board Report

and the code was imported in Apache's Git, and mirrored > on Github. > > Date of last release: > > Not yet released under the Apache incubation umbrella. > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > No new election. > > Signed-off-by: &

Re: [DRAFT] May 2015 Board Report

wish/need to be > aware of? > > No, still getting started. > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > The SGA has been signed and the code has been imported. > More discussions happen on the Apache lists now. > > How has the project developed since t

Re: Question about Apache's voting procedures

Votes are not the issue. Building community and building consensus in that community is the issue. To specifically answer your questions: It depends on the vote. For project technical issues, project committers are usually the voters. For project management issues, the voters are project manag

Re: [DRAFT] May 2015 Board Report

e added? > > John > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:48 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > > > Here are the recent IPMC additions sorted by time of addition: > > > > Amareshwari Sriramadasu [2015-04-11] > > David Lester[2015-04-11] >

Re: You know what... Apache is just too complicated.

Stefan, Nothing says that Apache is the right place for all projects. It definitely isn't. Apache isn't even the right place for all developers. It may not suit you. In my own work, I contribute to some projects which are small and which aren't important enough to have a large community. I con

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

Incubation is a fine idea here. I think that the project is at high risk of not making it to top-level because of the voting requirements, but if the committer and PMC can be built, it should be a fine (quiet) project. And it should never be viewed as a failure or even a problem for a project to

Re: [DISCUSS] Freemarker Incubation proposal

As an interesting aside, increasing the scope of Freemarker might improve sexiness. Consider extending to be a Scala templating engine. Or some similar small effort that ropes in a new community. On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some

Re: [PROPOSAL] ChimeraCRM

Shibasis Have you read the materials on how apache projects work to build community? Look at some of the other incubator proposals to see some of the issues that have been addressed. See in particular: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Enteri

Re: [PROPOSAL] ChimeraCRM

some other proposals I guess I am in a > learning curve. Honestly I am very new to apache community... So please > bear with my lack of knowledge for sometime. > > Cheers > Shibasis > On May 23, 2015 2:47 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > > > > > Shibasis &g

Re: June report prep

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > The responsibilities of the Report Manager are documented using a script, > report_runbook.py, which generates all the necessary commands. Ted, please > try running this from a checkout of the Incubator Subversion repo: > > python3 re

Incubator time line

Report time is coming around again. Here are the pertinent details. June 2015 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2015 Wed June 03 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun June 07 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun June 07 -- Summary due by end

Re: Need people.

Stefan, The j...@apache.org mailing list might be what you are looking for. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Stefan Reich < stefan.reich.maker.of@googlemail.com> wrote: > I believe Apache should be a dating facilitator between projects and > people. Helps everyone. > > I am REALLY looking

Re: June report prep

--- > > Luke Han > > 2015-05-28 6:04 GMT+08:00 Marvin Humphrey : > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Ted Dunning > > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Marvin Humphrey > > > wrote: > > > > >> The first action of the

Re: Blog policy for poddlings

This is also why there need to be disclaimers on releases and such. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > To clarify one step further: podlings are not official projects, so any > outreach via apache.org (and its name/recognition) needs appropriate > messaging. That is why we ha

Re: Sentry 1.5.0 release (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TinkerPop 3.0.0.M8-incubating Release (Part Deux))

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > So we now have Sentry artifacts being distributed which have not been > approved > by the full Incubator PMC. A similar situation with another project was > once > resolved by having the full PMC vote on the already-distributed > artifact

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin-0.7.1-incubating

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Luke Han wrote: > According these, should we re-generate another release candidate and > vote again, or could we go with this RC2 ? > > Really would like to learn and know more feedback from community for > our first release. > Better to fix the first rel

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator

It is vexed because when pronounced by many people, it sounds almost identical to how those same people would pronounce Mesos. That can lead to confusion. On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > Again, how isn't this a viable name? > > There is no trademark on the word Mysos

Re: Incubator time line

at 11:53 AM, amareshwarisr . > wrote: > > > Ted, > > > > Apache Lens should have been on the reporting projects in this report. > > Seems missing. Last report for Lens was April2015. Should I go ahead and > > add Lens ? > > > > Thanks > > Am

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mysos into the Apache Incubator

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > > It is vexed because when pronounced by many people, it sounds almost > > identical to how those same people would pronounce Mesos. > > > > That

Re: June report prep

questions. I suggest adding a note to the report. The situation is a bit problematic because there are several people in the project who should understand process better and raise this issue themselves. On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:38 PM,

Re: June report prep

2015 at 3:23 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Does the Sentry podling (PPMC) disagree with their mentors recommendation? > I agree with the mentors proposal for both and actually raised this last > month as an issue. > > John > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:56 AM Ted Dunning wrote: &g

Re: June report prep

Well, I do have to say that my impressions are based on an accelerated reading of the dev list, but I really didn't see much attention paid to issues like the preparation of the report, posting a vote result email to the right place and so on. More importantly as far as my impression is concer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.0 (incubating)

My compliments to Justin for catching this and for the community for (nearly) resolving this even before. Well done all round. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Changing my vote to +1 binding > > > The MPL license was used by pnotify. We removed it as part of JIRA

Re: June report prep

We can omit (my tendency) or publish with notes. I think just including a note saying that there was an issue on Sentry that is being dealt with aggressively and which will be reported on monthly for a bit is sufficient. The board needs to know that they know everything they need to know. A half

Re: June report prep

I can get it tonight. This last week has been crazy. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 14, 2015, at 20:36, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Hi, Ted, > > Do you need someone else to finish and file the report? > > Marvin Humphrey > > --

Incubator board report

No elected PMC and/or committers Signed-off-by: [X](asterixdb) Ate Douma [ ](asterixdb) Chris Mattmann [ ](asterixdb) Henry Saputra [X](asterixdb) Jochen Wiedmann [x](asterixdb) Ted Dunning Shepherd/Mentor notes: AsterixDB has provided monthly reports for March, April, and May. So, it

Re: June report prep

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > There are a few more cleanup and followup tasks to take care of in order to > prepare for next month: > > * Assign podlings who did not report a "monthly" attribute in > podlings.xml. > * Remove any expired "monthly" attributes. > *

Re: Poddlings @ApacheCON EU CORE

I think it is quite doable, but it would require steely discipline to get people to stick to the time limits. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > currently I'm helping with the Incubator > track @ApacheCON EU CORE and I'd > like to run an idea by you guys. Do you

Re: Licensing Issue

Yes. That does sound like a blocker as it stands. Is there any prospect for relicensing? Is the BerkeleyLM package suitable for pulling into the Joshua project so that KenLM becomes an optional dependency? On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrot

Re: June report prep

Great idea on taking notes. On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Ted Dunning > wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Marvin Humphrey < > mar.

Re: June report prep

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> * Assign podlings who did not report a "monthly" attribute in > >> podlings.xml. > >> * Remove any expired "monthly" attributes. > >> * Run clutch.py. > >> * Assign shepherds. > >> * Generate the July report template and p

Re: June report prep

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > However, I'm trying to hold off on that conversation until the current > Chair > has actually performed all the tasks involved with the report and so groks > the > full scope. Hint hint. ;) > Hint accepted.

Re: Licensing Issue

Stefan, In order to "open source" something, you have to define what you mean by "open source". If you mean that anybody can do anything at all with the code including claim it as their own, then you mean to put it into the public domain . If you mean

Re: Licensing Issue

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Oddly, you as an individual in the US can't *put* a work into the public > domain, but you can make a quit claim that forswears defense of any of the > exclusive rights of you, the copyright holder. That does not in any way > remove th

Re: Licensing Issue

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton < dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > There's a difference between making a claim, affixing a notice, etc., and > it being lawful and the right to having done so being legally defensible. > > I suspect this normally doesn't matter and is a trifle

Re: Licensing Issue

for. On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Stefan Reich < stefan.reich.maker.of@googlemail.com> wrote: > What do you think I meant? > Am 26.06.2015 08:51 schrieb "Ted Dunning" : > > > Stefan, > > > > In order to "open source" something, you hav

Re: [Discuss] ORDS to join Apache Incubator

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Kris Popat wrote: > ORDS pipelines data from recognized sources such as csv files, > spreadsheets, and relational database files into structured online > databases to provide “Database as a service” (DBaaS) functionality. It has > a full set of tools for managing a

Apache Incubator Report

rixdb) Henry Saputra [x](asterixdb) Jochen Wiedmann [x](asterixdb) Ted Dunning Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer CMDA provides web services for multi-aspect physics-based and phenomenon- oriented climate model performance evaluation and diagnosis through the comprehensive an

Re: Shepherds

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Please have that incorporated in the Roles and Responsibilities page ( > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html) > > The shepherd institution is slowly tailing away as fewer and fewer > shepherds partici

Re: Draft report July 2015 -- please review

Your mentors should be abel to access it. On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote: > Sorry for digging this out, > > but in case of using reporter.apache.org for the poddling reports - if > you are just a PPMCs that is what you see after logging in - "You are > not a member o

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >