On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> I'm embarrassed to report that I'm feeling a bit foggy on the new
> committer policy, and a quick tour with google failed to find it on a
> web page. We're long on pages about initial podling setup, and not so
> long on others.
>
> So, if
+1
Patrick
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
>
>> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
>> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
>> below.
Hi Jukka, I'm also concerned for S4 not having a release and low
activity. I pinged them about cutting a release a couple months ago
and they said they weren't ready. As for activity there is some
mailing list traffic but almost no jira/commits listed in april/may.
For Bigtop i've been tracking di
at least 4 separate organizations represented by active
commiters.
Regards,
Patrick
>>
>>>
>>> Needless to say, when the graduation proposal reaches this list, and I'm
>>> sure it will, I will strongly endorse the IPMC to reject the proposal.
>>>
&g
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 10:48 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 23, 2012, at 10:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>>&g
I've added Crunch to the monthly report for June. There is currently
no shepherd assigned, someone want to volunteer or doesn't it make
sense at this point?
Patrick
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There's plenty of time still before the June reports [1] start
Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be
reached and allow people to move on.
Patrick
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>
>
> The graduation requirements say
>
> "The project is considered to have a diverse community when it is not highly
> depend
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> There is currently no shepherd assigned, someone want to volunteer
>> or doesn't it make sense at this point?
>
> I'll give a closer look at your upcoming report unless someone beats
> me to it. I guess you're still busy setting things up, so
Btw, S4 is short a mentor. It would be great if one or two IPMC
members could volunteer and help Arun and I with mentorship duties.
Regards,
Patrick
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi Jukka, I'm also concerned for S4 not having a release and low
> activity. I
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> Isn't this why we vote. To come to a decision when consensus can't be
>> reached and allow people to move on.
>
> When diversity concerns were rais
+1. sig/xsum verified. The RAT report looks good. I ran through the
incubator release checklist and all of the items seem to be covered. I
was able to run all of the unit tests successfully.
Patrick
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> Dear Incubator PMCs,
>
> Oozie Incub
esam...@apache.org
> * Hari Shreedharan hshreedha...@apache.org
> * Henry Robinson he...@apache.org
> * Jaroslav Cecho jar...@apache.org
> * Jonathan Hsieh jmhs...@apache.org
> * Juhani Conn
Seems that was dropped from the template? it's here on the "how to
release" page: http://incubator.apache.org/oozie/HowToRelease.html
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:45 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 June 2012 15:36, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> The Apache Oozie team is pleased to announce the release of Oozi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
>> + 1. Still working towards an initial release on Apache with the current
>> + code (version 0.4 = version 0.3 + checkpointing + bugfixes)
>
> Is there some specific issue blocking t
s ==
> * concurrentlinkedhashmap - Apache 2.0 License -
> http://code.google.com/p/concurrentlinkedhashmap/
>
> == Cryptography ==
> none
>
> == Required Resources ==
> * Mailing Lists
>* blur-private
>* blur-dev
>* blur-commits
>* blur-user
>
Blur has been accepted into the incubator with the following vote tally:
+1 : 15 (10 binding)
-1 : 0
Patrick
vote details:
Dave Fisher (binding)
Bill Graham
Tim Williams (binding)
Jukka Zitting (binding)
Mohammad Nour El-Din (binding)
Patrick Hunt (binding)
Ashish Paliwal
Olivier Lamy (binding
FYI, you should CC the incubator general list on release votes.
I mentioned it on the dev list - the incubator status page for s4
needs to be updated, it's significantly out of date.
Patrick
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Matthieu Morel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is the first release candidate
+1. The signature and checksum files all verify for me. I ran through
the release checklist and that seems fine. RAT check looked good.
license/notice files look valid for both src and bin artifacts.
Patrick
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> +1, I checked that the src art
You need "passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.".
afaict so far you have 1 (me).
Patrick
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> We are missing an IPMC vote for this release and the vote closes today. Can
> we get an IPMC member to vote, please?
>
> Thanks
10x to what Chris said, put much better than I could.
We all wear multiple hats, can't tell you the number of times I've worn my
Apache hat in the office, in some cases to my own detriment there. If I
weren't associated with the project at Apache that representation would be
missing. So really it
I haven't seen the "quick closing" aside from things like some test
cleanups, even then the average was 5 days. I ran the jira report for
resolution time and it certainly doesn't seem like jiras are being closed
"instantly". Most of these are closed after many (typ. double digit, some
tripple) days
I see this (the release discussion threads you linked) as a semi-mature
community that's well aligned. A number of folks responded to the request
for discussion and said they were in favor. It was done on the ML in the
open. What more do we want? I don't see anyone excluded and I'm sure if
there wa
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 04:41 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> > I think it is a good sign that community is volunteering to do the
> release
> > work.
>
> I think the point I'm making is largely being ignored. I'm not seeing
> much room for volunteer
fwiw it's +9 by my count (24->33). Sentry is security, so by my definition
that's pretty good. ;-)
Patrick
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> All of our projects are primarily in the recruitment business, so it does
> concern
> me that a project that's been here for over a ye
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > ...Sentry started with 24 committers/PPMC. It hasn't added any PPMC
> members
> > since its inception...
>
> If that's correct I'm -1 on graduating Sentry.
>
> and earlier he
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 04:42 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > ...what would the action item the community should take away from
> > this? As their mentor I'm not sure what advice i can give them. "add more
>
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > ...If you read the graduation requirements it says nothing about adding
> PPMC
> > as a strict requirement to graduation:
> >
> http:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Joe, has any of this conversation put your mind at ease about the
> > podling?
>
> I'm less concerned than I was, yes. I'm still not in +1 territory. I'm
> not entirely sure I'm out o
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > So you are -1 then. That's fine. But it gets back to my original concern.
> > It's artificial. I can go back to the Sentry community and say "hey,
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2015 10:03 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz"
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > > ...If you read the graduation requirements it says nothing
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:05 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
>
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
> * I would invite folks with access to go to Sentry's private list and
> look over discussions about adding new contributors, and discussions
> about the project in general.
>
>
> I
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015, at 08:43 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > I don't think that's the question on the table. Typically, podlings make
> > committers == PPMC members. The reasoning being that the only thing a
> > PPMC member can do is vote on
I already voted on the dev list thread, but here's my +1 again.
Patrick
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi IPMCs,
>
> Please help Twill community to VOTE on release.
>
> Thank you.
>
> - Henry
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> +1 bi
t;* Gregory Chanan
>
> * Guoquan Shen
>
>* Hadi Nahari
>
>* Hao Hao
>
>* Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>
>* Johnny Zhang
>
>* Karthik Ramachandran
>
>* Mark Grover
>
>* Milo Polte
ng Wang, Intel
* Uma Maheswara Rao G, Intel
* Kai Zheng, Intel
* Rakesh Radhakrishnan Potty, Intel
* Sean Zhong, Intel
* Henry Saputra, Independent
* Hao Cheng, Intel
=== Sponsors ===
Champion
Patrick Hunt
Nominated Mentors
* Patrick Hunt - Apache IPMC member
* Andrew Purt
This vote has PASSED with the following tallies:
+1 Binding total 9
Patrick Hunt
Jacques Nadeau
Henry Saputra
James Taylor
Andrew Purtell
Chris Nauroth
Arvind Prabhakar
P. Taylor Goetz
Ted Dunning
+1 No-binding, total 11
Phillip Rhodes
Ramkrishna S Vasudevan
Uma Gangumalla
Debo Dutta
Tsuyoshi
Hey there, just back from vacation and getting caught up. Thanks for
the reminder!
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
> Hi, John
>
> I think our mentors are busy during the day.
> Patrick was on vacation last week. I'd suggest give them a few more hours to
> signoff t
I had to use
mvn -pl
'!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-nvml-vmem-service,!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-pmalloc-service'
clean install
on my mac (guess I didn't have mvem and pmalloc installed?)
Patrick
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I ch
Hi Gary. You want to summarize all the votes, including the ones on the
project's dev list, here - I (and others) had voted on the dev list thread
already.
Patrick
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> After being open for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Mnem
+1 xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean, checklist looks ok. Was able to
build/test/install the source. lgtm.
Patrick
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote:
> Hello incubator PMCs,
>
> The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and
> approved the proposal to rele
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:35 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to start the process to move forward on a new incubator website.
> Based on discussions in the past on list, I wanted to do the following:
>
> - Roll out a new technology stack + repository
> - Leave content in place, while
+1 Graduate Apache Mnemonic from the Incubator
Regards,
Patrick
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote:
> Hello IPMC and everyone,
>
> The Mnemonic community has voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote
> passed with
> 14 +1s (including +9s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s.
>
> He
+1 sig/xsum are valid. RAT ran clean and the checklist looks fine to
me (license/notice/disclaimer/etc... are all good, etc...)
Patrick
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Ryan Blue wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose a vote to release parquet-format-2.2.0-rc2 as the
> official Parquet Fo
+1 - xsums/sig verify, RAT ran clean and the appropriate files are there.
Note: for some reason the sha512 file is gzip'd (at least it was when
I d/l it via chrome), not a text file. However if you un-gzip it the
sha512 matches.
Patrick
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> NO
+1. the sig/xsum validate. Rat ran clean and the files all look right to me.
Patrick
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Signature file look good
> Checksum files looks good
> NOTICE file looks good
> LICENSE file look good
> DISCLAIMER file exist
> No third party executables
+1 - xsum/sig are valid. Rat ran clean. Ran through the release checklist
and everything seems fine there.
Patrick
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:11 PM, gqshen wrote:
> Hello IPMC
> We have passed the PPMC vote for Sentry incubator release 1.5.0-rc0 with 3
> +1 votes from Prasad Mujumdar, Lenni Kuf
Ted can you give some concrete examples, because I see some good feedback
along with folks attempting to address the feedback. Processes updated or
re-iterated, etc... I haven't seen any comments like "stop the presses
till... is addressed" and that being ignored. More along the lines of an
issue b
eedback and the response (ongoing) from the community we
should be able to get things back on track.
Thanks,
Patrick
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:14 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> Ted can you give some concrete examples, because I see some goo
ors aren't inclined
> to sign off based on some of the issues that have popped up.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:35 PM Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
>> Hi David, you and Joe have been doing great, I'm afraid I've been
>> distracted with more issues at home/work than usu
101 - 150 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
