Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2-rc3 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Downloaded, checked signatures, checked checksums Leonard > On 3 Oct 2023, at 00:10, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.7.2 (incubating), > release candidate 3. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastruc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.7.3-rc1 (incubating)

I also carry my +1 non-binding vote from dev. > On 18 Apr 2024, at 13:08, Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Carry my +1 binding from dev@ vote. > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 7:06 PM Bertil Chapuis > wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release Apache B

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Baremaps 0.8.2-rc3 (incubating)

Hello, I follow up with my vote: +1 (non-binding) > On 19 Feb 2025, at 21:54, Bertil Chapuis wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.8.2 (incubating), > release candidate 3. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastructure > components f

incubation disclaimer and infrastructural reshuffle (was: Disclaimer...)

, and ideally, a notice wherever a sponsoring project directly links to one of the podlings' resources (other than its website). Finally, the podling needs to display the incubator logo on its website. --- back to my corner! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: incubation disclaimer and infrastructural reshuffle

Sam Ruby wrote: I would go further. Essentially, a release by a podling would require a vote by the incubator PMC to do so. a release by *any* project requires its supervising PMC to vote it through. Since for podlings, the supervising PMC is by definition the incubator PMC, you're not going any

Re: incubation disclaimer and infrastructural reshuffle

the appropriate due-diligence by the responsible PMC. Respect for the decisions by the community from the PMC had better be implicit and it had better generally be known to all participants that the respect is there. If this is not crystal clear to all, what you have is a screwed-up community. cheers!

Re: nightly builds (source and binaries) for incubating projects

Hi Robert, AFAIK, there is no policy. As to practice...some of the incubating projects participate in gump (jakarta.apache.org/gump), some don't. I would recommend all java-based projects participate in gump as its the only in its kind :D cheers, - Leo robert burrell donkin wrote: does a

Re: How to manage change in the Incubator rules

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Because of this, I would suggest that we remove the "draft" status on our policy docs and simply use them as our guide, that will change in need without having to go through tedious votes when there is good consensus. Objections? no

me @ incubator!

Hi gang, I received an e-mail directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] this morning. That must mean I'm subscribed :D. I also saw my (mispelled!) name on the website under the heading "PMC". Neat (happy to be here!), but I must say I'm a bit puzzled with how that came to be. Here's what happened: I wasn't as

Re: Common naming accross policy/process/roles

Hi gang, it's puzzled me how much effort some of us have been putting in /normative/ documentation of policy, process, roles and responsibilities. It must be a programmer thing :D Who needs "normative" documentation? Why? - the board knows what incubation means - the incubator PMC knows what incu

General <--> Projects

Hi gang, what's the exact seperation between these two? The website (http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Mailing+lists) doesn't list them...I'd like to update, but I'm not sure what description to post. cheers! - LSD ---

Re: Common naming accross policy/process/roles

er! cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Restoring project web sites

its best if the geronimo people manage their own site...someone should nag the appropriate people to do the appropriate things ;) - Leo Noel J. Bergman wrote: Looks like Leo posted instructions to CVS while I was away. Reading

Re: incubator website is hosed

the geronimo people to learn an old tool, its best to invest 15 minutes in learning a new tool. The geronimo site is built using maven, which uses anakia under the covers, but makes things look a lot better. An interesting page might be http://maven.apache.org/star

Re: incubator website is hosed

Henri Yandell wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Personally, I've had my fill of this kind of crap being left on our public infrastructure. I shouldn't have to wait days to update a trivial website. If someone doesn't beat me to it, I am going to replace it with Anakia tomorro

Re: [RT] Incubated project websites

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Proposal: 1 - every project site sources stay in the project CVS sure. 2 - every project has this URL space where to publish the site: http://incubator.apache.org/projectname +1 (or under the wings of their TLP if they wish) 3 - every project has an incubation sta

Re: [RT] Incubated project websites

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: 2 - every project has this URL space where to publish the site: http://incubator.apache.org/projectname +1 (or under the wings of their TLP if they wish) Actually this is the point. I tend to think that they should

Re: [RT] Multiple Mentors

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: What do you think? +1 to redundancy. -0 on making it an 'absolute' requirement. We need to make sure we ourselves don't get so completely lost in figuring out the right process that there is no energy left to apply it.

Re: [Website] Project homepage

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: What do others think? Two options: 1) do a transparent rewrite of incubator.apache.org/lenya to cocoon.apache.org/lenya (ie, not a redirect) 2) search-and-replace to replace links to cocoon.apache.org/lenya with incubator.apache.org/lenya or assert* whether lenya incub

Re: Add 'practice' PMC structure to projects in incubation

, and its the other way around as well.) in summary: +1 to a "core group" / "practice PMC" / "committer list" for incubating projects +1 to self-management -0 on all p&p which seperates priviledge from responsibility back to my corner! - Leo ---

Re: Add 'practice' PMC structure to projects in incubation

Noel made an interesting suggestion on the PMC list: --- Alternatively, the PPMC could consist of the Incubator PMC, the destination PMC (in cases where there is one), and project Committers. In that case, there is a single streamlined process, without additional interconnects. This does have the

Re: Generated sites

Jason van Zyl wrote: I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a Wiki setup and JIRA. maybe that's because you're watching :D seriously...some food for thought perhaps... the wiki is the first bit of ASF infrastructure I'm getting more than passively involved in. Jaso

Re: Generated sites

Jason van Zyl wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:32, Leo Simons wrote: Jason volunteered, I volunteered, we were given access easily enough, proposals were accepted easily enough, and then it just took weeks for us to get things in shape. That's got little to do with process or committees

Re: Generated sites

Jason van Zyl wrote: what exactly do you doubt? That somewhere between getting access and now, in your moment of fire of trying to get something done you were stopped in your tracks because you were probably waiting on something else to happen first. I should have explained that better. My pe

Re: [VOTE] Incubate Apache Ruper (was about Repo)

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Other votes? +1, generally agreeing with all other comments made so far. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Official Name for "Geronimo" Project

he.org&searchText=name&defaultField=subject&Search=Search - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Official Name for "Geronimo" Project

Aaron Bannert wrote: [ -0 ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name. [ -0 ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ -1 ] - Disallow "Geronimo" but allow the committers to come up with any other name they want (barring anything inappropriate). I don't like multiple-choice votes

Re: [VOTE] Official Name for "Geronimo" Project

Aaron Bannert wrote: On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 08:53:55PM +0100, Leo Simons wrote: Aaron Bannert wrote: [ -0 ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name. [ -0 ] - Punt the decision to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ -1 ] - Disallow "Geronimo" but allow the committers to come up

Re: [RT] Incubator Reorg

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: How is it to be done? Shoot. JFDI applies. I think every PMC member and every ASF member that had something to say about the PPMC idea was basically in favour. We have consensus on the broad plan; enough of a mandate to get things underway. Create a PPMC battle plan and

Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

Jason van Zyl wrote: What's going to happen with AltRMI and the FtpServer? They just sit in the incubator indefinitely? There's no IP issues as these came from within Apache anyway? If an incubated codebase has no slated home within then I would ask how it even landed here in the first place? Both

Re: Apache Gallery Project

ware of an existing one? You could take a look at the KDE, Gnome, or Fedora Core art projects. I'm sure there's more gallery-style projects out there in the desktop linux world. cheers! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [

Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

Jason van Zyl wrote: I would propose those documents be changed to state that what is outlined above is a prerequisite for entry into the incubator. Is this something that requires a member vote as it affects everyone here because the production of useful software is what we're doing here at Apach

Re: [VOTE] New Incubator rules and scope definition (long)

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Hence I ask to vote It's a big thing to vote on all at once. I still have question marks with some points. What I'm looking for is some signal that we are moving in a direction where the TLPs will actually *want* to follow incubation procedure (which would be a good sign

Re: [VOTE] PPMCs for Incubating Projects

Aaron Bannert wrote: Also, it seems to me that any Incubator PMC member who has joined a PPMC list is already acting in the role of "Mentor"? Now that we have PPMCs, we don't need to have an explicit role of "Mentor" anymore. Can we get rid of these complicated rules and roles and terms now that w

Re: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

don't believe it should become a part of the ASF. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

merry christmas!

Hi gang! I'll be with my folks this christmas, so won't be reading e-mail until dec 30 or so. To everyone: Gozhqq Keshmish!* - Leo Simons * apparently the Western Apache translation of "merry christmas" ---

SpamAssassin status file

Hi gang, could someone (mentor or someone else involved) please start writing and filling out a status file for spamassassin? It's kind of difficult figuring out where we are with things :D Quick howto: checkout 'incubator' cd incubator/site/projects cp incubation-status-template.cwiki spamassass

Re: donation of project

;ll make a little noise around the OSS java community, see if this attracts some interest, if it has the potential of becoming a real project. If so, we'll start incubation. Why not start incubation immediately? IMHO, we need to get a feel for the code and the people involved with the code fi

Re: PPMCs and oversight

Stephen McConnell wrote: Look at things from the other way round. For all practical purposes you are the defacto point-man with respect to the Directory project. From the point-of-view of people on the directory project you are the man they can turn to privaetly, ask questions, seek advice, a

Re: PPMCs and oversight

Stephen McConnell wrote: Berin Lautenbach wrote: Leo Simons wrote: IMHO, as long as a project still requires a "point man" (or as long as the PMC still requires such a person in order to be kept up to date of what is happening in the directory project), the project is not ready for

Re: PPMCs and oversight

Berin Lautenbach wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Absolutely! A good test of maturity. If the mentor is doing absolutely nothing and things are going well, then there is no need for a mentor and quite possibly no need for the project to be in incubation anymore. Exactly! So you are saying there

Re: PPMCs and oversight

Stephen McConnell wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Berin Lautenbach wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Absolutely! A good test of maturity. If the mentor is doing absolutely nothing and things are going well, then there is no need for a mentor and quite possibly no need for the project to be in incubation

Re: PPMCs and oversight

Stephen McConnell wrote: My response was related to the on-going debate about invididuals versus group reponsibilities. What I described is role of an individual lined to both an incubating project and to Apache at large. I descibed the benefit that such a "real-person" can bring to a new gr

Re: donation of project

Hi Matt, (IANAL) Matt Liotta wrote: Thanks for all the responses. At this point, I am reluctant to release the code under an Apache style license without a community behind it. I don't want to see our code go into some proprietary project and never benefit the community because the actual ope

Re: Fwd: MerlinDeveloper incubation query

ne. I agree that the above is not the most extensive or user friendly process documentation; but that's because we're sort-of figuring it out as we go. cheers! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fwd: MerlinDeveloper incubation query

http://www.apache.org/licenses/. CLA was sent in kind-of "last year", and according to Andreas teh software grant has also been faxed in by now. good! We'll have to wait for an acknowledgement from the secretary (Jim) that its in. In the meantime, lets do the code audit :D --

Re: Fwd: MerlinDeveloper incubation query

vote on that as well? If so, should that vote occur before or after the initial import? -- cheers, - Leo Simons --- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ IoC Component Glue -- http://jicarilla.org/ Article

Re: Fwd: MerlinDeveloper incubation query

Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thursday 08 January 2004 07:47, Leo Simons wrote: Do we require a PMC vote on that as well? If so, should that vote occur before or after the initial import? My proposal is that we do a combined vote at the Avalon PMC; * Acceptance of this codebase with * Andreas as a

Re: versatile container for software components

others...they all are used to fill similar roles. It might be a good idea for you to review these projects and investigate possible co-operation with one or more of these. -- cheers, - Leo Simons - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: donation of project

Matt Liotta wrote: I didn't see a reply from anyone in regard to my message below. Just curious if the interested parties have seen it. saw your message, no time to look at it yet, sorry. I've flagged things for follow-up later on. busy as always :D cheers, -

NCSA attribution is optional (was: Re: [STATUS] (incubator)...)

Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. yes. -- cheers, - Leo Simons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

an Incubator case study

#x27; that something should be done and spent time on is something that I really don't enjoy at all, so those 4 hours spent count double IMHO. Do with this data what you please. The conclusion I personally draw from it is "we should stop complaining about process, and JFDI". -- c

[VOTE] graduate MerlinDeveloper from incubation

ace your votes: [ ] +1 -- yes [ ] ±0 -- abstain [ ] -1 -- no -- cheers, - Leo Simons PS: I started this vote on the PMC list, but Roy pointed out it belongs here. PMC members, vote whereever you like (but suffer Roy's wrath :D)...I'll figure things ou

Re: [VOTE] Granting committer status to log4net developers

Ceki Gülcü wrote: Given that no one has yet answered, probably my question was silly. nah, the subject line threw me off...I suspect many people are ignoring the rest of the thread :D However, I still don't know where the STATUS file should be placed. according to incubator policy, inside incubat

[VOTE:RESULT] graduate MerlinDeveloper from incubation

wiki and double check to make sure all items mentioned are correct and any mentioned action items have been properly executed before commencing import. thanks to everyone who helped make the incubation process go as smooth as possible.

Re: [REPORTS DUE] Status reports of Incubating Projects

mentor to summarize things, present an argument, run and tally the vote, etc. -- cheers, - Leo Simons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[RT] How to graduate

quot; if we don't really need to. Just take a look at what people have said, what consensus seems to be, etc. Moreover, take a look at what *you* think. -- cheers, - Leo Simons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

crosssigned keys as graduation requirement (Re: Request for graduation)

on. While it'd be good to be more conservative about signatures, large parts of apache aren't at the moment. So I'm not sure its an issue the Incubator needs to solve...more something for the entire ASF. IMHO!

Re: cvs commit: incubator/site/projects gump.cwiki

more hours (invested by various people, including me) than just taking care of the paperwork. And that kind of discussion is less fun than paperwork, imnsho :D -- cheers, - Leo Simons --- Weblog -- http://leosimon

Re: cvs commit: incubator/site/projects gump.cwiki

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Seems like Gump will be going TLP. I am just going to unofficially start incubation while votes take place, procedures are hammered out, etc etc. Projects being promoted to TLP don't have to go through the Incubator. Norm

Re: [VOTE] Graduate JaxMe from incubation

Roy T. Fielding wrote: Dims, as I have mentioned before, we cannot vote on such things on a private list for the record: +1 -- cheers, - Leo Simons --- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ IoC Component Glue -- http

Re: [VOTE] Graduate jUDDI from the Apache Incubator

Steve Viens wrote: [Graduate jUDDI from the Apache Incubator] I'll have to +0 this one as I haven't kept track of jUDDI at all. Good luck fellas! -- cheers, - Leo Simons --- Weblog -- http://leosimon

Re: New Incubee

e what they think. Common sense applies. -- cheers, - Leo Simons --- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ IoC Component Glue -- http://jicarilla.org/ Articles &am

Re: Questions regarding a Clover donation

s for our group as well. hehehe. do ask for an ASF-wide license too ;) -- cheers, - Leo Simons --- Weblog -- http://leosimons.com/ Component Community -- http://componentplanet.org/ Component Glue --

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Pluto

David Sean Taylor wrote: The Portals PMC would like to graduate Pluto out of incubator into the Apache Portals project. +1. Good luck to pluto! We believe we have met the requirements for exiting incubation except for updating the status file, which someone should do ASAP :-D -- cheers, - Leo

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Geronimo from Incubator and recommend as top-level project

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: [ X ] +1 - The Geronimo project has met the requirements for incubation and will be recommended to the board for TLP status it's about time :-D - Leo Simons - To unsubscribe, e

Re: Releasing Lenya 1.2

e incubator pmc for graduation, and then one from the cocoon pmc for the release. Cocoon is probably better able to judge release quality, and it makes a more exiting press release :-D cheers! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA

please update incubator info

Hi gang! someone still needs to go in and update the details related to geronimo in the incubator cvs module. cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[RT] incubation time

s dragging on for months. Incubation is "process", and what we should all be doing is "development". All IMHO :-D. WDYT? cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Releasing Lenya 1.2

Leo Simons wrote: besides the incubator policy docs, you can see application of them to several projects in the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list archives. someone requested an example: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=771976 cheer

Re: [Summary ]Re: [TEST+VOTE] Lenya 1.2 Release

ing 2 (not 3) to 8 :-D Regardless, what an annoying rule, eh? Law sucks :-D cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RT] incubation time

we are quite sure where it should be, which is okay, as long as we keep evaluating :-D I myself am inclined to restrict this kind of "policy" to whatever is required to keep the ASF legally defensible, but no more. That is basically what we're doing now, no? cheers, - Leo -

Re: The 50% Rule (was RE: [Summary ]Re: [TEST+VOTE] Lenya 1.2 Release)

Cliff Schmidt wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote on Friday, June 11, 2004 2:24 PM: On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 04:01 AM, Leo Simons wrote: [is the rule that a project just needs 3 independent committers, or is there an additional rule that no more than 50% of the committers must be part of a single

Re: [REQUEST] Lenya 1.2 release endorsement and approval

Rolf Kulemann wrote: With this mail the community wants to carry out (1) the formal request for the endorsement of our mentors, Stefano and Steven, and (2) the request for release approval at the incubator pmc as defined in the incubation policy. +1 - Leo Simons

Re: [Summary ]Re: [TEST+VOTE] Lenya 1.2 Release

e. For projects to grow and development to continue, something easily downloadable is important. I believe the Lenya peeps understand that all this is not an optimal situation, are working to change that, and in the meantime are adhering (for this release) to the rules and guidelines that h

Re: [Summary ]Re: [TEST+VOTE] Lenya 1.2 Release

big thing*, for legal and other reasons). If I were lenya, I wouldn't complain about constraints, but just address those concerns. You will see constraints vanishing in smoke. cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Summary ]Re: [TEST+VOTE] Lenya 1.2 Release

Michael Wechner wrote: Leo Simons wrote: In this case, Noel has raised some perfectly valid concerns about files living on http://www.apache.org/dist/ without a PMC putting them there (which is a *big thing*, for legal and other reasons). If I were lenya, I wouldn't complain about constr

Re: The 50% Rule

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote: I have no idea where that 50% stuff came from. me neither! But I figure it was added for /some/ reason :-D IMO, there ought to be a sufficient independent community such that if commercial

Re: [Summary ]Re: [TEST+VOTE] Lenya 1.2 Release

public by the community. Noel, have your concerns been addressed? Feel like changing your mind? cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The 50% Rule

nites where all the numbers look just fine. Its just not possible to decide these things based on numbers. People interactions are only "measurable" on a statistical scale, which we don't have. cheers, - Leo - To

Re: [VOTE] Graduate SpamAssassin from Incubator, recommend TLP

Sander Striker wrote: I'd like to call for a vote to graduate SpamAssassin from the Incubator. looking at the status file ! Verify distribution rights || date || item | -..-.. | Check and make sure that for all code included with the distribution that is not under the Apache license, we ha

Re: [VOTE] Graduate XMLBeans from Incubator and recommend as top-level project

Cliff Schmidt wrote: [X] +1 - The XMLBeans project has met the requirements for incubation and will be recommended to the board for TLP status - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [VOTE] Graduate SpamAssassin from Incubator, recommend TLP

Sander Striker wrote: [X] +1 - The SpamAssassin project has met the requirements for incubation and will be recommended to the board for TLP status - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

resource usage

Hi gang! Noel J. Bergman wrote: I would also like the GUMP folks to take a close look at their needs. Specifically, I have just made arrangements that they ought to be able to get a copy of VMware GX for brutus. That will allow them to clone system configurations from a master disk image (virtual

Re: resource usage

wrong list! Sorry! - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: proposal: modify incubation application process to require a reference to the code itself

Brian Behlendorf wrote: In walking through the incubation documents (helping a couple of groups who have asked me about how to do this) it struck me that there was no requirement that the proposal provide a link to download and evaluate the code around which a project is being proposed - in fact

Re: Requesting Bugzilla Karma for Andreas Kuckartz

Rolf Kulemann wrote: Hello, Hi Rolf! on lenya-dev we had an agreement that Andreas Kuckartz should get more Bugzilla Karma. He is not sending patches, but is following Lenya development since I can remember and is effectively maintaining and tracking Lenya bugzilla entries and he often adds value t

Re: Personal attacks and respect

Stephen McConnell wrote: Stephen McConnell wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: unnecessary and unwarranted disruption of an incubator project Let it go. >> >> I would like to retract my comments above. good! This sounds like progress. Is the issue now resolved as far as the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is co

Re: [VOTE] Lenya exiting incubation

PMC voted to accept it? (and the policy changed about the 50% rule since discussing it :-D) I also vaguely remember some concerns expressed a while back on the PMC list. I take it those have all been addressed? cheers, - Leo - To

Re: [VOTE] Lenya exiting incubation

Rolf Kulemann wrote: I also vaguely remember some concerns expressed a while back on the PMC list. I take it those have all been addressed? Would be very interesting for us to know about those concerns. Can you give more details please, or isn't it our _concern_ to know them? We only can improve o

Re: [VOTE] Lenya exiting incubation

Noel J. Bergman wrote: has the cocoon PMC voted to accept it? The suggestion from Stefano is that it become a TLP, so cocoon doesn't need to vote to accept it. ehm sorry, that wasn't clear before. I guess we're in a hurry then :-D. Steven may still be on a vacation. If he's back, I'd like to hear

Re: [VOTE] Lenya exiting incubation

+1 for Lenya to graduate from incubation and apply for a TLP. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Accept iBATIS for Incubation

+0. Haven't had time to review. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Accept JCR for Incubation

Roy T. Fielding wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JcrProposal Please cast your vote as +1 (yes), -1 (no), or something in between. +1 - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

[VOTE] Proposal for Castle

Hi all, Please vote on the Castle incubation proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CastleProposal +1 from me. References: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=4289 http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=894370

Re: Castle proposal

rge.net/projects/xproject?? Correct me if I'm wrong, but that seems rather dead and empty. Why not just use jira? cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Castle proposal

and it'll take "some" convincing to have the infra team support yet another issue tracker (we have bugzilla, eyebrowse and jira already). Hence, it's probably most productive to just go with jira for now. cheers! - Leo

Re: Castle proposal

ittle paperwork. Anything related to licenses, code IP, CLAs or something like that? I'm kind of lost here :-) no worries, that's precisely why the incubator is here :-D cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

[VOTE-RESULT] Proposal for Castle

Leo Simons wrote: Please vote on the Castle incubation proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CastleProposal binding votes: +1 - 1 vote -1 - 1 vote non binding votes: +1 - few more That means the proposal is not accepted. The basic reason is that the Castle developer group is currently

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Derby from the incubator

On 22-04-2005 13:47, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 18, 2005, at 12:59 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: >> ... > I'd love to see what some people think about the community - go look at > the lists. That is what I looked at first, and it gave me confidence. Derby seems to be doi

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >