;
If you don't find a more suitable champion, I'd be please to offer my
support.
There is defintively a need for some XACML related project at the ASF.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
will be glad to have Emmanuel and
> Colm help us as Mentors.
I'll be pleased to be a mentor, and having Paul as a Champion seems the
perfect fit !
Waiting for the proposal now :-)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
project, but the 'minimum quorum of
three +1 votes' rule is universal."
However, having -1 would be a sign that something goes wrong. Either on
the community side, or on the voter side ;) Better try to see why a -1
(or many) have been casted before going for the release
che
Incubator Amber podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
Project are hereafter discharged.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
met.res.in/|Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology]] || yes
> ||
> ||M. V. S. Rama Rao||ramarao at tropmet dot res dot in
> ||[[http://tropmet.res.in/|Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology]] ||
> yes ||
> ||Tsengdar Lee||tsengdar dot j dot lee at nasa dot gov ||
> [[http://hq.nassa.gov/|NASA HQ]] || no ||
> ||Laura Carriere||laura dot carriere at nasa dot gov
> ||[[http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/|NASA Goddard Space Flight Center]] || no ||
> ||Denis Nadeau|| denis dot nadeau at nasa dot
> gov||[[http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/|NASA Goddard Space Flight Center]] || no
> ||
> ||Michael Joyce|| Michael dot J dot Joyce at jpl dot nasa dot
> gov||[[http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/|NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] ||yes||
> ||Shakeh Khudikyan||Shakeh dot E dot Khudikyan at jpl dot nasa dot
> gov||[[http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/|NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] ||yes||
> ||Maziyar Boustani||Maziyar dot Boustani at jpl dot nasa dot
> gov||[[http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/|NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory]] ||no||
> ||Suresh Marru||smarru at apache dot org||[[http://pti.iu.edu/|Indiana
> University]] ||yes||
>
>
> == Sponsors ==
> Champion
>
> * Chris Mattmann (mattmann at apache dot org)
>
> Nominated Mentors
>
> * Chris A. Mattmann (mattmann at apache dot org)
> * Chris Douglas (cdouglas at apache dot org)
> * Paul Ramirez (pramirez at apache dot org)
>
> Sponsoring Entity
>
> * Apache Incubator
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
had 3 very good chairman those last years (Noel, Jukka and you),
and I'm pretty sure the new chairman will be as good as they were !
Congrats to all of you, guys !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
---
y I'm interested :)
If this project needs a mentor, I can be one of them.
You would be very welcome. Feel free to sign up on the wiki page.
np, will do.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscri
t of incubation : The ASF is not
sourceForge, and we promote Community above Code : the project must
remain alive even if you quit it.
Thanks !
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
---
ave 3 mentors is just to mitigate
the risk that one of them is not fullfiling his duty.
Now, if we are to discuss the way incubator should be managed, then the
best is to start another thread.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.ikte
[X] +1 Recommend Jukka Zitting for the IPMC chair position.
(binding)
Go Jukka !!!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
site-publish and the modifed file, is there something else I
have to update ?
Thanks !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
somewhere else than in incubator/public/trunk
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
Le 2/21/12 2:09 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 21 February 2012 09:31, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
yesterday I tried to update the incubator web site to reflect the renaming
of the deft project to AWF. To some extent, it was successful :
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ points to AWF
fied:
incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/.htaccess
That won't last - you need to update the source file in site-author
and regenerate.
PING - the last site rebuild overwrote your change.
Ok, many thanks !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.
ething ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
gards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
(binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h
other poms do chain back to the Apache pom]
Adding :
org.apache
apache
10
should do the trick (Check that the current version is not > 10)
Thanks !
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubs
e
suprem court can understand what is in it, I'd suggest that if you have
a doubt, just include them.
In any case, as soon as the required notes are in the NOTICE file, it
should not be a blocker.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccòwrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread
Le 5/9/12 6:35 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 9 May 2012 07:42, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharnywrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find
/
If this is the second attempt, why is it called RC1 ?
Surely it should be called RC2 ?
Depends. As the first vote has been canceled, there was nothing like an
official RC1.
As noted in the subject, this is the 2nd attempt for RC1.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.ikte
Le 5/14/12 1:03 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòwrote:
I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following artifacts
up
for a vote:
SVN source tag ( r13
Le 5/14/12 4:05 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 14 May 2012 08:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 14/05/2012 01:03, sebb wrote:
On 12 May 2012 23:59, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 5/12/12 1:42 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 11 May 2012 16:29, Francesco Chicchiriccòwrote:
I've created a 1.0.
site too. Is this
not the case with Syncope?
Hmmm... Good question. I never voted against any web site on the various
projects I worked or mentored. Where does it come from ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek
Le 5/15/12 9:31 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit :
On 14/05/2012 20:45, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Emmanuel
Lécharny wrote:
Le 5/14/12 6:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Can you please let me know which license XPP uses? I could not find
informatino in
t prior written permission. For written permission,
please contact http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/.
5. Products derived from this software may not use "Indiana Univeristy"
name nor may "Indiana Univeristy" appear in t
oduce the above copyright notice"
This includes the provided war file. There is no copyright notice of
XPP and my guess is the license holders are not interested if we are
having it as transitive lib or not.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
---
[X] +1 approve (binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
elf is the only way
to provide a guarantee to your users, and by listing those transitive
dependencies in the N&L files is the only way to go.
At least this is my interpretation on the various discussions we have
had in the ast two months while tryibg to cut a release on Syncope
(
Le 6/24/12 4:32 PM, sebb a écrit :
On 24 June 2012 14:11, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
AFAICT, the important thing is that those who will download Kafka (or any
other ASF project) can't be fooled when includig it into their own projects.
The N&L files are here to facilitate our user&#
incubation, to make sure the peeps being STV
code *knows* about the Apache Way...
Or is this simple non-sense ?
My +1 to the TLP without going through incubation...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To
on the awf-dev list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-awf-dev/201207.mbox/browser
Personally, I think it's time for retirement as activity has not
picked up despite some previous discussions about the projects future.
I do agree.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Léc
Do not retire the project, because ...
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
WBR
Roger
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
oing for one more quarter, for Seven to get a chance
to catch in, but sadly, he now have no more time...
I don't think the projects members will be surprised if we shutdown the
project. I do agree, though, that we should have followed the procedure.
Hope it clarifies the current decisi
-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
candidates.
Ah, ok. Makes sense then.
My perception is that the Syncope guys are trying to cut a 1.0.0,
instead of going through many 0.x.0 before, therefore they are iterating
on RC atm.
It's pretty much semantic, IMHO.
Do incubator peeps think it's a wrong approach ?
--
R
2012 08:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 27/07/2012 08:13, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 7/27/12 1:02 AM, Joe Schaefer a écrit :
I believe Bill is complaining not about the venue,
but the choice of referring to this package as
a "release candidate" instead of simply dropping
the "
ing them to get
a first release inside Apache would help. Branching may be a problem as
the code base will evolve in both projects, making it difficult to merge
later. (IMHO)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory
Hi guys,
is a code donation require a software grant signed from the employer of
the people who wrote the code ? In other words, do we require that the
employer explicitely allow the employees to work on some code ?
M understanding is that it's required, and the employer must sign the
grant and a
Le 01/09/15 16:36, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> ...is a code donation require a software grant signed from the employer of
>> the people who wrote the code ? In other words, do we require that the
>>
Le 01/09/15 16:55, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>> ...typically, the copyright might be claimed by
>> the employer, as if the code was written during day job, which then may
>> be a legal proble
Le 01/09/15 16:55, jan i a écrit :
> On 1 September 2015 at 16:44, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>> Le 01/09/15 16:36, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
>> wrote:
>>>> ...is
Le 01/09/15 18:15, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
> jan i wrote:
>> Your concern is valid for all countries in EU. except if a country has a
>> exception. the default in the IT industry is that the employer
>> need to allow you to do similar work off hours ...
>> in any case copyright belong to the comp
Le 23/09/15 08:45, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>> ...you should not worry too much about having the project to be in
>> incubator forever...
> That's assuming the community grows.
>
> https://github.com/easymock/easymock/graphs/c
Le 12/10/15 13:18, Rich Bowen a écrit :
> Fellow mentors,
>
> There was a conversation at ApacheCon about the Incubator. I'll leave
> it to the other participants to champion the particular parts that
> they are passionate about, but I was particularly concerned with
> mentor disengagement, and sug
Le 11/10/15 17:59, Andrew Pennebaker a écrit :
> In the future, could Apache Incubator require projects to maintain better
> API documentation before graduation? In particular, Kafka has rather sparse
> documentation in v0.8. The Javadocs appear to be randomly hosted on this or
> that professor web
Le 15/10/15 11:46, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> FYI I have started an experiment at
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-groovy/blob/master/MATURITY.adoc ,
> using our maturity model to evaluate Groovy before its mentors suggest
> its graduation (which should happen very s
Le 15/10/15 13:17, Rich Bowen a écrit :
> A huge +1, but I wonder about a few things. Who does the work?
I guess that each PMC should be responsible for this work, with a dead
line soft enough that it allows each check to be done with no stress,
and under the supervision of some members in charge
Le 15/10/15 13:49, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>> ...I do think
>> that an audit of all the existing TLP should be done in the next month
>> to check if all the iterms are correctly fullfiled
> Th
Le 15/10/15 16:28, Filip Hanik a écrit :
> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>
>> Le 15/10/15 13:17, Rich Bowen a écrit :
>>> A huge +1, but I wonder about a few things. Who does the work?
>> I guess that each PMC should be responsible for
Le 18/10/15 10:48, Martijn Dashorst a écrit :
> -1 on requiring all projects to do this exercise. It is not policy,
> and frankly as a volunteer organization we can let the communities
> themselves determine whether this is something they want to spend
> their time on.
Well, I unerstand your conce
[X] +1 Graduate Apache Groovy from the Incubator.
Obviously !
Le 28/10/15 22:14, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
>>
>> I lurked on the Groovy dev list for a while and they did great. The
>> community handled some pretty challenging licensing stuff well (stars
>> to Paul King for doing some heavy lif
Le 29/10/15 02:43, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>
>>>> The incubation checklist looks good. The language of the graduation
>>>> resolution looks good, but one thing:
>>>>
>>>>
+1s
>> total, 5 are binding:
>>
>> Guillaume Laforge
>> Cédric Champeau
>> Paul King
>> Jochen Theodorou
>> Pascal Schumacher
>> Emmanuel Lécharny (binding)
>> Bertrand Delacretaz (binding)
>> Andrew Bayer (binding)
Le 05/11/15 13:48, Joe Brockmeier a écrit :
> On 11/05/2015 03:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>> PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the codebase,
>>> which is why I cringe every time I see people talking about what "the bar"
>>> should be. It's about trust. If you trust so
Le 18/11/15 03:06, Todd Lipcon a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
>> On the contrary... The business of the Incubator and IPMC is to help
>> podlings
>> and their communities to grok and follow the Apache Way. Trust is a
>> foundation
>> principal of a healthy
Le 18/11/15 08:12, Todd Lipcon a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>>> Except that there seems to be great disagreement among the Members as to
>>> whether RTC is somehow anti-Apache-Way.
>>>
>>> If you want to try
Le 18/11/15 11:31, Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> I believe the issue here is that with CTR it is very easy to miss the 72h
> lazy consensus voting (with an assumed +1 absence any votes cast) that most
> CTR projects operate under... and thus it can also be very easy to miss the
> fact that there are
Le 18/11/15 14:34, Stephen Connolly a écrit :
> On Wednesday 18 November 2015, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>
>> Le 18/11/15 11:31, Stephen Connolly a écrit :
>>> I believe the issue here is that with CTR it is very easy to miss the 72h
>>> lazy consensus votin
Le 18/11/15 17:54, Ross Gardler a écrit :
> Summarizing:
>
> In a healthy project I believe that the only significant things that change
> between CTR and RTC are:
>
> 1) speed of commit (CTR is faster)
> 2) quality of master, not releases (RTC catches most issues before commit,
> CTR shortly aft
Hi !
Despite an effort to reboot the project in april, we weren't successful
in keeping the existing committers active. At this point, a decision to
retire the podling was taken, and a vote was don eon the PPMC :
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e87c384315966c81c523fad94326d8c72e312b3025d2e7b
Ok, I think it's time to close this vote. Wev' got 7 +1 for the retirement :
Bertrand,
Colm,
John,
Mark,
Roman,
Ted,
and me.
I'll move forward from this point.
Thanks !
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.a
Le 19/09/16 à 15:16, Mark Struberg a écrit :
> To be honest: I was a bit worried when the github import blew up. That was
> actually the main reason why I started a local import.
Beside playing with the import tools for your own interest, I seriously
doubt that importing the netbeans code base on
Le 19/09/16 à 13:10, Raphael Bircher a écrit :
> Hi Geertjan
>
> I'm registred at NetBeams now, to get a closer look at the project. I
> was a bit shocked about the similarities with the formar
> OpenOffice.org project. The structure of the Project, the workflow
> etc. are so close to the OpenOffic
Le 19/09/16 à 16:33, Mark Struberg a écrit :
> Linux never was on hg, so the comparison doesn't fit.
>
> To be more clear: I'm not concerned that GIT cannot handle the NetBeans repo
> size.
> But we cannot guarantee yet that the import from hg to GIT doesn't loose
> important information or work
Le 19/09/16 à 20:50, cowwoc a écrit :
> Mark Struberg-2 wrote
>> Linux never was on hg, so the comparison doesn't fit.
>>
>> To be more clear: I'm not concerned that GIT cannot handle the NetBeans
>> repo size.
> I actually concerned by this. A client I work for has a large Git repo. I
> doubt its
Le 21/09/16 à 07:37, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> I've recently had an inquiry from a former Sun employee who
>> used to hack on NetBeans way back when: how was the list
>> of initial committers determined? Or more importantly, if he
>>
Le 23/09/16 à 15:30, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit :
> OK. Before the vote, will work on making the initial contributors list as
> complete as possible.
>
> What is the process for doing that? Do I simply make changes directly in
> the proposal? Do I make the changes public here before adding them to t
Le 24/09/16 à 15:18, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
>
>> Correct. The whole point of Incubation at Apache is to show that the
>> community can learn to self-govern by following Apache processes - and a
>> key point of self-governance is respon
Le 24/09/16 à 01:25, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> Hi Wade,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Wade Chandler
>> wrote:
>>> ..I can say as a long time contributor who is not on the initial list, I
>>> understand, think it is fine
Le 25/09/16 à 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit :
> It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases
> contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list.
And this is the reason you have mentors and a champion. Follow their
advices, you'll be fine (because if s
Le 26/09/16 à 07:32, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>> But if you are thinking 100 people, I'd try to get it down to 40-ish.
>
> Seems like a very random number. In the case of NetBeans, that would mean
> we'd have few others on the list than th
Le 26/09/16 à 22:49, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit :
> Thankl of the below has been done.
>
> Some more are being added. However at this point the more we add the more
> insulting to those we omit. We've done our best. The list is strong. None
> will commit nothing, all have a history of years being ac
Le 27/09/16 à 13:25, Greg Stein a écrit :
> The NetBeans proposal (among many others in the past) has demonstrated a
> significant "problem" with trying to establish an appropriate list of
> initial committers. There are many people that want to be on, for various
> reasons. Because they are commit
An obvious
> [X +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
En pratique, la question de la langue à utiliser sur une liste de
diffusion est spécieuse. L'anglais est la Lingua Franca du 21ème siècle.
And if you haven't understood what I wrote in my native language, which
is understood by around 500 million people around the globe, I guess you
get my implic
Le 13/11/16 à 22:57, Reynold Xin a écrit :
> "a better global way to A) communicate across a medium that everyone uses
> daily B) archive to search and come back to"
>
> How would we even validate or decide that? For discussions like this it is
> very easy to fall into confirmation bias.
>
> I us
,
Emmanuel Lécharny
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Le 15/12/14 19:22, Hal Lockhart a écrit :
> The OpenAz Project currently has two mentors, but we need at least one more.
> Is there anyone who would be willing to join us?
If we can be more than just 3 mentors, that would be extremelly cool !
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Le 11/03/15 21:20, Martijn Dashorst a écrit :
> Great initiative!
>
> Just one question: I don't see anything related to the groovy name and
> possible trademark in the proposal. Does Pivotal have any claims to
> the name groovy, and if so are those claims transferred to the ASF?
I think we have r
Le 12/03/15 10:57, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i wrote:
>> ...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the
>> initial
>> commiters are only 5...
> As others have said this was discussed while preparing the proposal. I
> also
Le 12/03/15 11:14, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
> Am 12.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i wrote:
>>> ...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and
>>> the initial
>>> commiters are only 5...
>>
>> As others have said
Le 12/03/15 18:59, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> It is my pleasure and privilege to open up the following
>> proposal:
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
> I've read through the proposal (rev 17). It looks good to m
Le 13/03/15 12:13, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
>> community. Forgive me presuming to say this but this seems a
>> contradiction with The Apache Way as written about. Also it is very
>> CVCS/Subversion focussed.
>>
>> In a DVCS world, committers are just the gatekeepers of the central
>> mainline, the j
Hi guys,
we can discuss for 3 more months, but at some point, isn't it time to
start a vote ?
We already have demonstrated our ability to raises various points on
various subjects, time to demonstrate The ASF in action !
-
To
[X] +1 accept Groovy in the Incubator
(Binding)
Emmanuel Lécharny
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Le 22/03/15 00:09, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
> wrote:
>
> We wanted to have community to play with the RC3 release for a bit until we
> release the final 1.0 release in a week or two.
> Because "release candidate" and "RC" are specialized terms
Le 22/03/15 11:04, Jochen Theodorou a écrit :
> Am 22.03.2015 00:09, schrieb Marvin Humphrey:
> [...]
>> Because "release candidate" and "RC" are specialized terms with
>> precise meaning at Apache and because we make a strong legal
>> distinction between "released" and "unreleased" code, this is
>
Le 19/03/15 07:55, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit :
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
>
Le 23/03/15 20:38, Guillaume Laforge a écrit :
> We're already worrying about it enough, don't frighten us ;-)))
Mentors, get the whip out, they are ready ;-)
Congrats guys, this is the very first step, not the most interesting one !
Hi guys,
ok, the vote result is out, groovy has been accepted. I suppose the next steps
are :
- vote the 5 proposed persons as committers, once they have submitted
their ICLA (it's already done for a few of them)
- create groovy ML (dev, commits, users, private, ...)
- create the git repo
- push t
Technically, I just added two moderators. We can add some more, I guess.
One more thing : in order to add initial committers, the pdofling must
be listed in https://id.apache.org/acreq/members/?. How do we add it ?
-
To unsubscr
Le 25/03/15 19:42, Jake Farrell a écrit :
> podlings do not appear in the acreq script until they have been added to
> podlings.xml, even if they file their ICLA with initial committer as part
> of groovy.
It has been added in podlings.xml.
I'm currently fighting to get the groovy page to appears
Le 25/03/15 20:00, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>>> ...Another question : who is in charge of all those tasks ?..
>> If you could create tickets like the
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8968 example that would
>> enable o
Le 25/03/15 22:23, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
>> ...I'm currently fighting to get the groovy page to appears in the
>> incubator web site, I'm not lucky atm.
> I just published
>
>
Le 26/03/15 01:01, Konstantin Boudnik a écrit :
> I have just helped bootstrapping two podlings in the last a couple of months,
> so I will add JIRAs to do the what needs to be done from the INFRA side of the
> things.
Here is the Infra JIRA :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9338
As
I think we are going a bit too far here.
Groovy has been under the AL 2.0 license since it moves from BSD (back
in 2003). AL 2.0 says :
" Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor
hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge,
royalty-free, irre
Le 26/03/15 14:43, Guillaume Laforge a écrit :
> So, in summary, can we all agree that I (Groovy projet lead /
> representative) can fill in the form, and say "on behalf of the Groovy
> community", I grant the rights to the ASF?
Jim said "Just do it !"...
Let's discuss about the legal aspect ther
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
