Le 15/10/15 13:17, Rich Bowen a écrit : > A huge +1, but I wonder about a few things. Who does the work?
I guess that each PMC should be responsible for this work, with a dead line soft enough that it allows each check to be done with no stress, and under the supervision of some members in charge of helping them. > Who > evaluates the results? Either the board, or a group gathered for that purpose. > What happens when projects "fail"? Well, I guss some corrective actions should be applied. The question is more about which of the item must be considered as mandatory, and which can simply be considered as optional. Bottom line, we most certainly will have to create a group of volunteers, for a limited period of time, a bit like the shepperds we have in Incubator. <side note> Actually, I think that at some point, we will need to audit each project periodically to check if they respect the various rules we now have (and that includes checking the N&L, a task that sebb is doing - and he deserves some respect for that ! -, and other aspects relative to the web site, the packages, etc...). But this is just something I feel in my guts, not something I see as necessary atm. I certainly don't want The ASF to become a giant buraucracy !!! </side note> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
