Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny<[email protected]> wrote:
Comments inline
Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit :
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Sebb,
you can find my replies embedded below.
I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging
repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for
1.0.0-RC1-incubating from scratch.
Regards.
The NOTICE file is very long; I suspect that not all of the entries are
*required*.
The LICENSE and NOTICE files were written against the parent POM: all the
dependencies with scope != test were considered, then.
The N&L files must relate to what is actually included in the archive.
We release sources, so making a distinction between scope != test
dependencies and scope=test dependencies does not make sense, AFAICT. If we
use a 3rd party product to test Syncope, then I think we must refer their
licenses in NOTICE and LICENSE.
No, AIUI the N&L files only relate to what is being released, not any
external dependencies.
See JDBM example in
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#note-license-and-notice.
Typically, JDBM will be a dependencies, but still it requires you to
include the needed references into N&L files.
I'm a bit lost here, as the idea is to allow users to download the
source package we release, and not infringe any of the 3rd party
software Licences, by including in our own N&L files what the 3rd party
product requires us to include.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
