r
> Bertrand Delacretaz
> Don Brown
> Craig L Russell
> Davanum Srinivas
> Niclas Hedman
>
> Is this enough of a quorum to begin incubation? Again, thanks to those that
> have provided input both into the proposal and via this vote. We appreciate
> the reception of the co
+1
On 05/25/2009 11:03 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
+1
Craig
On May 25, 2009, at 12:31 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi all,
The Sling podling has voted on asking the Incubator PMC to support its
graduation as a top level project.
The vote passed with 23 +1 votes (8 of which from PPMC members
Hi Folks,
Results of the vote: 6 binding +1 votes, 3 non-binding +1 votes
Niclas Hedhman (*)
Davanum Srinivas (*)
Nicholas L Gallardo
Kevan Miller (*)
Bertrand Delacretaz (*)
Luciano Resende (*)
Don Brown
Otis Gospodnetic
Craig L Russell (*)
The Apache Wink Proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org
ily
find the emails.
Please let me know if you need more information. You may want to read
up more on the setup process etc here
(http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html)
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
fyi, wink-dev@ / wink-commits@ / wink-private@ are in ready. Please
subscribe by sending one email each to wink-dev-subscribe@ /
wink-commits-subscribe@ / wink-private-subscribe@
thanks,
dims
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Eli, Nick,
>
> #1) Created an svn
[X ] +1 to recommend Sling's graduation
On 05/29/2009 04:26 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
[X ] +1 to recommend Sling's graduation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
+1 Aseca
On 05/30/2009 04:31 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
+1 Aseca
Craig
On May 29, 2009, at 7:29 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
--
ho had not already joined the wink-dev@
mailing list to that list. If you wish to use another email address,
please let me know.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> fyi, wink-dev@ / wink-commits@ / wink-private@ are in ready. Please
> subscribe by sending one email
+1
-- dims
On 07/14/2009 06:53 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1 (IPMC binding)
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache
Wookie, a W3C widget eng
+1
On 08/12/2009 10:29 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
+1
On 8/12/09 0:50, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
PMC and others,
Lokahi's community has collapsed long time ago and albeit Noel's
repeated efforts to create interest around the project, there is no
signs of any improvement.
I am therefor calling a vo
+1 from me.
thanks,
dims
On 08/19/2009 08:12 AM, sebb wrote:
On 19/08/2009, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
The Wink community voted on and approved the release of Apache Wink 0.1
The voting mail thread can be viewed at: http://tiny.cc/es4Zu
We would now like to request the approval of the
t; >> > --kevan
>> >> >
>> >> > -
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene...
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Kulp
>> > dk...@apache.org
>> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dk...@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Richard,
On 09/04/2009 03:49 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
So, no, I am not saying "everything should", but in general, it would be
nice if the spec impls started there since we have a community of OSGi
users and OSGi experts who are very active and receptive, many of whom
also work in the EE space
, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 9/4/09 16:10, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Richard,
On 09/04/2009 03:49 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
So, no, I am not saying "everything should", but in general, it would be
nice if the spec impls started there since we have a community of OSGi
users and OSGi experts wh
else :(
thanks,
dims
On 09/04/2009 04:49 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Richard,
I see your viewpoint better now. Thanks.
One more question, Will there be a problem of folks on d...@felix not
being able or willing to participate in a new podling? (If the folks
presenting this proposal do wish to
Karl,
There are *many* TLP(s) with overlapping scope as James Strachan pointed out
earlier in the thread.
I don't see the need to shoe horn a new community with new code into an existing TLP just because of scope. For all you
know by the time they get out of the incubator their scope may chang
is that d...@felix folks should guide the community being formed within the incubation podling process.
If we can get anyone interested join in as a mentor and/or committer that would be wonderful.
thanks,
dims
On 09/04/2009 06:04 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
On 9/4/09 16:49, Davanum Srin
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Karl,
There are *many* TLP(s) with overlapping scope as James Strachan pointed out
earlier in the thread.
I don't see the need to shoe horn a new community with new code into an
existing TLP just because of scope. For all you k
Ralph,
Not yet. Let's wait for the discussions to wrap up.
thanks,
dims
On 09/06/2009 02:59 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Sep 5, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Voting against a bunch of people forming a new community here at the
ASF is v.disappointing and goes against what IMO the
Richard,
I did agree with you that Felix would make a great choice as a destination TLP. The situation with ServiceMix/Karaf is
not the same as what is happening here with a new set of incoming committers and code.
I sincerely do hope that cross-pollination happens even when the podling is in
Stuart,
Thanks a ton. Please do join the aries mailing list(s) after we VOTE on (and hopefully accept) the proposal. All the
action will shift there from this mailing list.
thanks,
dims
On 09/05/2009 11:08 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/9/5 Davanum Srinivas
One more question, Will there
Marcel,
I believe it was an oversight to have missed mentioning ACE. Hopefully one of the proposed committers will comment on
this aspect.
thanks,
dims
On 09/06/2009 08:29 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
It probably got swamped in the discussion, but, on Sep 1, 2009, at 22:20
, Marcel Offermans
itial committer list on the
proposal wiki [1]. This naturally extends beyond Felix committers.
Apologies for x-post to d...@felix ... I wanted to attract as many as
possible :-)
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AriesProposal
Thanks,
Jeremy
2009/9/5 Davanum Srinivas:
Karl,
Please don't ge
initially posted, further initial committers
have volunteered from SAP, ProSyst, LinkedIn and some individuals.
Sponsors
Champions
Kevan Miller, Guillaume Nodet
Nominated Mentors
Guillaume Nodet, Davanum Srinivas (Dims), Kevan Miller
Sponsoring Entity
The incubator. Successful graduation from I
, can you please chime in with your VOTE? I am hoping that other
incubator PMC members who have not VOTE'd would cast their ballot as well
thanks,
dims
Davanum Srinivas+1
Craig L Russell +1
Ant Elder +1
Daniel Kulp +1
Matthias Wessendorf +1
Ke
+1 from me.
On 10/28/2009 04:17 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
[X ] +1 Accept Libcloud for incubation
Looks cool, good luck!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands
+1 from me.
On 11/04/2009 03:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1 :-)
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Subversion is a version control system. You probably know it well as
it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software
Foundation.
The Subversion projec
I agree with the following, i don't think a waiver is needed right now...
> "This is a graduation issue, why can't it just wait
> until then and say in the graduation proposal there's not been a
> release but its not necessary because of x y z."
thanks,
dims
On 11/10/2009 01:49 PM, ant elder wr
Personally i am ok with #1, but i am not sure if "svn switch --relocate" too
much of a burden for you guys :)
On 11/10/2009 02:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
There are two other issues to discuss for the Subversion podling:
* moving the mailing lists directly to @subversion.apache.org
* placing the
(which is very
important to us).
(and yes, because of that history issue, I personally have no problem
putting podlings at the top-level in our repository; it *is* version
control, and we can always remove failed podlings' code from anywhere)
Cheers,
-g
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 14:38, D
Jukka,
Not so sure... because that dist may contain code that we may not allow.
Greg,
Is there any code in there that is not Apache compatible? i see some in the
contrib section...
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/contrib/client-side/svn-clean
thanks,
dims
On 11/10/2009 04:25 PM, Jukka Zi
Jukka,
Agreed.
thanks,
dims
On 11/11/2009 01:47 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Jukka,
Not so sure... because that dist may contain code that we may not allow.
Personally I'd be happy with a plan from the Subversion team that
Brian,
Do you mind sending an email to pmcs AT apache.org to inform them that they should be using this new version of Apache
pom? And any other additional instructions needed to enable this "feature" to work.
thanks,
dims
On 11/11/2009 03:51 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
What is happening in some Ja
:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Wed November 11 2009 4:52:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Brian,
Do you mind sending an email to pmcs AT apache.org to inform them that they
should be using this new version of Apache pom? And any other additional
instructions needed to enable this "feature
those not using Maven. Just keep an eye on the annou...@maven
list. When available, it will be announced there.
Dan
On Wed November 11 2009 4:52:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Brian,
Do you mind sending an email to pmcs AT apache.org to inform them that they
should be using this new version
Thanks Brian!
On 11/11/2009 06:22 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
I think this is a pretty important issue worth "spamming" but whatever
I think it's worth noting, I've had several projects asking for it to
be available so
I agree with Joe.
thanks,
dims
On 11/13/2009 03:50 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Greg Stein
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, November 13, 2009 12:23:04 PM
Subject: Explanation of the extra pain (was: Two other issues to discuss for
Subversion)
Ok
+1, bring Clerezza into Incubator
On 11/23/2009 01:32 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
Please vote on accepting Apache Clerezza for incubation at the Apache
Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message and
as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ClerezzaProposal
<
ncubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Co-chair
>
> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> p...@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For a
Thanks for clarifying Jason. Am very sorry to hear about this. If i can be of
any help, please let me know.
-- dims
On 11/24/2009 07:49 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
No, this was all internal to IBM not to do with any Apache commiters or members.
--jason
On Nov 24, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Paul Fremantl
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Paul,
Please don't jump the gun - "Do you feel that the project needs
further independent mentors?" There is no communication from Jason to
the ppmc mailing list or the priv...@incubator mailing list and i
certainly haven
+1
-- dims
On 01/14/2010 06:58 AM, ant elder wrote:
> +1
>
>...ant
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Shindig
>> as a TLP [1].
>>
>> I would like to start an official vote to recommend the g
+1 from me
-- dims
On 01/19/2010 06:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Forwarding to Incubator PMC, your votes are welcome (and sorry about
> re-voting...we at ESME changed our minds slightly)
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe
> Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2010
+1
-- dims
On 01/31/2010 10:27 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> +1
>
> Craig
>
> On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our
>> active mentors to the proposed PMC, (for a total of 7 people), then ra
general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Sr
+1
-- dims
On Feb 13, 2010, at 4:26 AM, ant elder wrote:
+1
...ant
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our first release,
0.2.0. As required by Incubator policy, we need IPMC approval for
this release. There is a concu
ator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-ma
...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 from me
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On May 6, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
+1
Craig
On May 6, 2010, at 12:41 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose the Deltacloud API[1] for addition to the
Apache
incubator.
I have added the initial proposal to the
after project creation.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Tom White (tomwhite at apache dot org)
> * Andrew Purtell (apurtell at apache dot org)
> * Johan Oskarsson (johan at apache dot org)
> * Steve Loughran (stevel at apache dot org)
> * Patrick Hunt (phunt at apache
onto the proposal or just
> voicing
> support which is greatly appreciated.
>
> regards,
> Carl.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: ht
gt; +1
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: gene
+1 to IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process for voting in new committers (one question, would they need
an ACK from IPMC - similar to how PMC's send a note to the board for an ACK for new pmc members)?
In the 2nd question, "significant committers", are we asking mentors to ident
On 08/11/2010 05:19 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
On 8/11/10 1:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
So. Following some advice given to me by Sam Ruby,
I'd like to start experimenting with different organizational
and procedural approaches to the projects I participate in
here. What I want to do is to see h
Ant,
My personal opinion (and i am hoping!) was that such individuals from ppmc's who end up in ipmc would help build bridges
between podlings and will help get lessons learned (when any ppmc has issues/problems/roadblocks) back to their ppmc.
This is one area where i've seen people struggle, f
Joe,
Can they not +1 it either? :) seriously, it would be a bit hard to track 2
levels of ipmc members
-- dims
On 08/11/2010 07:24 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Davanum Srinivas
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 6:28:17 PM
Subject: Re
gt;
> Craig
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Oracle
> http://db.apache.org/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@oracle.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
> ---------
> To unsub
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
+1
Craig
On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
We have finalised the proposal with the additional committer and it
has now been posted for a couple of weeks, so I'd like to put it to
Fair enough :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
Hi Dims,
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Craig,
in my mind, it's not the number of steps that we eliminate, it's the
message that we send. Instead of saying you all
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> F
+1
-- dims
On Aug 23, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> I'm very happy to see Patricia contributing so enthusiastically.
>
> +1
>
> Craig
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> We are short one IPMC vote for a new River committer. She's been an
>> enthusiasti
Lists
>>
>> kitty-dev
>> kitty-commits
>> kitty-user
>>
>> Subversion Repository
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/kitty
>>
>> Issue Tracking
>>
>> Jira; project known as ‘kitty’
>>
>> Affiliations
David,
Yes, current practice is exactly what Benson outlined.
thanks,
dims
On 09/13/2010 08:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the cl
dditional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incub
<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/libcloud/tags/0.4.0>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 from me
On 10/07/2010 11:52 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Hi all,
after more than 72 hours, this vote has started and together with
those received on the podling list [1], we have now received
sufficient IPMC binding votes to proceed with the release of ESME 1.1.
We got 3 binding IPMC +1 votes
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:47 PM, "Richard S. Hall" wrote:
> +1
>
> -> richard
>
>
> On 10/28/10 15:42, Marcel Offermans wrote:
>> After the initial discussions about Celix have finished, we now have three
>> mentors and would like to call a vote to accept Celix i
oupIds of the current Stanbol dependencies,
>> omitting org.apache.* and commons-* groupIds but including transitive
>> dependencies.
>>
>> {{{
>> asm
>> com.aetrion.flickr
>> com.beetstra.jutf7
>> com.drewnoakes
>> com.googlecode.json-simple
>> com.hp.hpl
tes,
> so the droids subdomain is already reserved IMO.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incub
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
;
>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>> Apache Aries Project:
>>
>> * A. J. David Bosschaert
>> * Adam Wojtuniak
>>
may eventually require hardware
>>
>> We are currently hosted on googlecode. There was an option in googlecode
>> available to transfer a googlecode project to Apache. We would like to ask
>> the hosting staff at Googlecode if they could maybe
; * Tim Fernando - info (at) timfernando (dot) com
>>
>> == Required Resources ==
>>
>> === Mailing lists ===
>> * devicemap-dev @ incubator.apache.org
>> * devicemap-commits @ incubator.apache.org
>> * devicemap-private @ incubator.apache.org
>>
>> === Subversion Directory ===
>> http:
---
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
--
+1 binding
-- dims
On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Monday, April 09, 2012 06:32:24 PM Kevin Kluge wrote:
>> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the
>> Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and I have also i
ves Wink with Kevan and Davanum as mentors.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail
+1 binding
-- dims
On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:20 PM, "Alan D. Cabrera" wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
>> report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato pod
+1 straight to TLP
-- dims
On Jun 30, 2012, at 7:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
> of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serve as
> the project behind our STV and voting tools.
>
> The impetus behind this wa
+1 (binding)
-- dims
On Aug 11, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 10 August 2012 16:12, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
>>
>> Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
>> two new commi
not everyone downloads the application from the web site so it's worth
> including a link in either the release notes or the read me (it's also
> good for indexing.)
>
> the license contains a type in a jar references
>
> - robert
>
> -----
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ttp://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.99-RC2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/0.99-RC2/>
>
> The SVN tag for the release is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/0.99-incubating/
>
> Many t
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t further
> >
> >RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> > Incubator Tuscany podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> > Project are hereafter discharged.
> >
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com/blog/
>
>
>
> ---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ary tale to communities if a project cannot serve
> the interests of all its members.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional co
--
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; was
accepted *JUST* for community reasons.
thanks,
dims
On 10/23/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel,
>
> FYI, I could plainly see who was working hard to co-exist and who
> wasnt'. IMHO, the people who left clearly did not want to
> play/partici
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
>
OTECTED]>
> Tim Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Martin Traverso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> = Sponsors =
>
> == Champion ==
>
>
t Shindig for incubation
>
> Yoav
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd say that the respective PMC's should fill up the IP Clearance form and
treat the incoming code just like any other
new contribution to an existing project.
thanks,
dims
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Links to the various relevant threads for anyone in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can confirm that tsik never made a release.
- -- dims
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
| Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
|> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
|>> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
|>>> i've been searching for releases by retired podlings in order to
|>>> archi
st
> place.
>
> Dims might know.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 from me!
- -- dims
Daniel Kulp wrote:
|
| Just a quick update while the vote is open.
|
| Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-dev.
| Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes. Vote is still
| open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Yahoo Folks,
Hang in there and keep us updated...
- -- dims
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFHo2vigNg6eWEDv1kRAlt4AJ9vuZQqbR9x8j23yPHl2tOJIj1ZyACfQTVb
hRtLR+n0f2e15Ay423ihKsY=
=Cv/t
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Craig L Russell wrote:
| +1
|
| Craig
|
| On Feb 9, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
|
|> Project Name: CouchDB
|> -
|>
|> == Proposal ==
|> The goal is to create either an Apache top level project around the
|> existi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 from me.
- -- dims
Daniel Kulp wrote:
| We held a vote on cxf-dev to grant commit karma to Bharath Ganesh in
| recognition of his many valuable contributions:
|
| Thread:
| http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Bharath-Ganesh-for-committer-to15511330.
301 - 400 of 675 matches
Mail list logo
