Hi,
Although I have an account for the incubator wiki pages, once I login
the pages still show as "immutable" and I can't edit or update them.
Yesterday I wanted to update the wookie incubator reports for November
but couldn't.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2012
Can someone add my
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Looks like when Om built the source archive, some unicode characters got
> mangled (maybe confused as Windows double-byte?)...
Yes that's probably what happened.
>
> Is this a release blocker given that this code is disabled? We turned of
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Paul Sharples wrote:
> Can someone add my account or update the ACL so I can update these pages in
> the future (psharples)
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@i
Hi Andrew -
Sounds great - we'd love to have you onboard.
The current MITRE prototype is Java/Spring based and leveraging the
Shindig and Rave projects. We are also using a reference
implementation of the pubsubhubbub protocol.
Jason
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Andrew Hart wrote:
> Hi Mat
Don -
I could see that as a possibility - we'll definitely take that into
consideration as we move forward with hashing out the project
architecture.
Jason
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
> wrote:
>> Apache Streams P
On 11/5/12 6:38 AM, "Joachim Dreimann"
wrote:
>+1 (non-binding)
>
>Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC members
>if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all?
>The minimum required 72 hours have also passed.
Unfortunately, a release requires at least 3 IPMC members
Marvin: Thank you for the helpful feedback. I will discuss this with the
other devs and raise tickets for us as appropriate. I believe Hyrum has not
yet voted to my knowledge, only Brane. So we still need two votes at this
point.
Matthew: Thank you for looking at voting for (or against) this relea
||| Hi all,
|||
||| I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
||| The last few months we have been working on this release.
||| Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
||| files into the correct place etc.
|||
||| The source release file and signatu
(Note the various distribution lists of this mail)
This is still a proposal to the Incubator, correct? From strictly a
trademarks@ point of view, the name needs final vetting before
graduation. As long as they're not causing an obvious problem with some
other related software product current
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Trademarks are fundamentally about consumers - not about the project leaders
> or committers.
At the risk of stating the obvious, this also points to a
"Googleability of a name"
issue (although with Apache prefix this is typically less of a c
Empirically, Model 1 did not work. That's been tried over the past ten years.
*shrug* ... whatever you want to do. I just wanted to speak up that
you appeared to be conflating the mentor and shepherd roles (as they
had been defined over the past couple months). If you *intend* to
combine them (Mod
I don't know what it takes to become and IPMC member, but I kind of like the
idea of having roles that don't require such formality (I may think too highly
of the process and role), but still can be recognized as providing guidance and
knowledge to those going through the process.
> Date: Thu, 8
12 matches
Mail list logo
