On 4/3/07, Omar Tazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF
contribution (see proposal below)
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addi
+1 (binding)
I'm impressed by both the quantity and quality of volunteers named in
this proposal, and I expect that a robust, vibrant community will be
the end result.
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
On 4/4/07, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
>> On 4/4/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I strongly think that Tomcat is your best ally here - in the same way
>> that
> Niklas, speaking with my Tomcat hat on, you're definitely welcome to
> join
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487002
]
Craig Russell commented on INCUBATOR-53:
Would IPMC members please take a few minutes to review and vote on
CXF recently had a vote to make Jarek Gawor a committer:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cxf-dev/200703.mbox/<7b774c950703271529h79ae73a0ya8305dc24709d098%40mail.gmail.com>
The vote passed with 12 +1 votes and no -1 votes.
Welcome to the project Jarek!
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Pri
Well,
incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html
[...]
Acceptance By Incubator
[...]
* the Mentors, nominated by the Sponsor, who will guide the Candidate
through the Incubation Process. At least one nomin
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well,
incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page:
FWIW, the two statements aren't contradictory. "At least one"
doesn't imply "not all." The second requirement is simply a
strengthening of the first one ;-)
I do agree that the text cou
On Apr 5, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well,
incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same
page:
FWIW, the two statements aren't contradictory. "At least one"
doesn't imply "not all." The second requirement is simply a
strengtheni
On 4/5/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well,
incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html
[...]
Acceptance By Incubator
[...]
* the Mentors, nominated by the Sponsor, who will guide t
I had recalled this being discussed before [1] because Cayenne had a
mentor who was not a member.
"Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jul 2006:
> Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
>> What do you mean fix the doc? Is it not the policy that mentors be
>> members? I've seen and been involved
"Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> there is a session, called "Incubating Open Source Communities" by J.
> Aaron Farr.
> Is this a similar session, like we did in Austin? Or a *general*
> session on the Apache Incubator?
>
> (there is no link available on the website, therefore th
Hi Niclas,
On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:52 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 05 April 2007 05:08, Craig L Russell wrote:
I have a hard time understanding how a podling can consider itself
ready for graduation without having anything worth sharing, and don't
understand what the point is of having a
On Friday 06 April 2007 05:44, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> I had recalled this being discussed before [1] because Cayenne had a
> mentor who was not a member.
So we are talking about a couple of variants;
1. An ASF Member.
2. An IPMC member.
3. A PMC member of the sponsoring PMC.
4. Any PMC mem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487144
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on INCUBATOR-53:
-
I disagree that "migrate" should be used instead of "move", sin
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Friday 06 April 2007 05:44, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>> I had recalled this being discussed before [1] because Cayenne had a
>> mentor who was not a member.
>
> So we are talking about a couple of variants;
>
> 1. An ASF Member.
> 2. An IPMC member.
> 3. A PMC member
[Should be off-line, but I think we programmer's need to be pointed into some
cultural enlightenment every now and then to broaden our horizons.]
On Friday 06 April 2007 11:44, Craig L Russell wrote:
> But please send a link to the meaning of kreti & pleti! I love
> learning new idioms and it'
On Friday 06 April 2007 12:03, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Mentors must be on the iPMC, most iPMC members are ASF members (very rare
> that it is otherwise,
Yes, I have noticed that ;o)
But I am one such rare case, so I see the distinction, and since an ASF Member
has the right to be member of
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Friday 06 April 2007 12:03, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Mentors must be on the iPMC, most iPMC members are ASF members (very rare
>> that it is otherwise,
>
> Yes, I have noticed that ;o)
> But I am one such rare case, so I see the distinction, and since an ASF
> Mem
18 matches
Mail list logo
