Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Well,
incubator policy is able to contradict itself on one and the same page:
FWIW, the two statements aren't contradictory. "At least one"
doesn't imply "not all." The second requirement is simply a
strengthening of the first one ;-)
I do agree that the text could be worded better.
Martin
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html
[...]
Acceptance By Incubator
[...]
* the Mentors, nominated by the Sponsor, who will guide the Candidate
through the Incubation Process. At least one nominated Mentor MUST be a
member of the Apache Software Foundation.
[...]
Roles Defined
Mentor
[...]
A Mentor is a role undertaken by a permanent member of the Apache
Software Foundation and is chosen by the Sponsor to actively lead in the
discharge of their duties (listed above).
[...]
So what is it? A mentor must be a member or at least one mentor must be
a member?
Confused
Henning
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 13:57 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/4/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process.
+1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand,
if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I?)
AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor.
yes but prospective mentors need not be
AIUI mentors must be members and should be drafted onto the IPMC by
the proposal motion
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
