Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

Hi, On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:09 PM Dmitriy Pavlov wrote: > ...If there are no sufficient volunteers involved, the project has a high risk > that development is stopped and the project is retired... More precisely, an Apache project requires at least 3 active PMC members [1] to operate. So, whe

Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

Hi Constantine, Anyway, thank you for bringing this idea here. I hope the project will find enthusiasts. About similar projects, it's totally not a problem. Let's Darwin decide. About community. Unfortunately, it is a paramount thing in Apache projects. If there are no sufficient volunteers invo

Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

Hi Constantine, I took a few minutes to look into your project. You have some interesting ideas. You might want to look into the features of some current Apache projects and incubator podlings. (1) Events Pulsar Kafka ActiveMQ (2) Topologies Storm Heron Airflow I’m sure there are many. Regards

Re: Project probe: AsyncFlows Framework

Hi, > 3. Is the project suitable for Apach Incubator considering that there are > already projects for the similar domain at Apache? We don’t care if there are similar project already incubator or exist as top level projects. > 4. Is the project suitable for Apache Incubator considering the cur

Re: Project informal discussion

Actually,I should have provided more details. Imagine it like this: Lots of interfaces,e.g,an interface "Class" which will have abstract methods like putMethod(Method[which will be another interface]),putField(Field[another interface]),and stuff like that. Now, let's say we implement all these inte

Re: Project informal discussion

Hi For sources any template engine is great so velocity, freemarker, ..., even strings (like cxf client plugin does) so need for a more formal lib is less true than for bytecode generation. Eugene (from codelutin not asf) is also a great one for sources. What would add yours? Kind of fear it ends

Re: Project informal discussion

You should also checkout something like Graal and Truffle https://github.com/graalvm/graal/blob/master/truffle/README.md Wade On Jul 18, 2017 02:01, "Jochen Theodorou" wrote: > On 18.07.2017 02:53, Harrison & Wells wrote: > >> # I'm just a beginner here, please ignore any stupidities >> So guy

Re: Project informal discussion

On 18.07.2017 02:53, Harrison & Wells wrote: # I'm just a beginner here, please ignore any stupidities So guys, you told me to discuss my project here first. Well, I have an idea of making a source code generator. There really isn't a source code generation library.And it can be done. It is reall

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for >> the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not >> just some engineers. > > Great! I just

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for > the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not > just some engineers. Great! I just wanted to capture a bit of serendipitous discovery on my part and m

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Has the podling gone through the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process yet? Not yet. Thanks for the reminder. > > Seems like that would come up in the shakedown, then -- just mentioning it > because you came across it now, Roman? > On Feb 26, 2016 5:33 PM

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

Has the podling gone through the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process yet? Seems like that would come up in the shakedown, then -- just mentioning it because you came across it now, Roman? On Feb 26, 2016 5:33 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

To be slightly more specific, we cleared it with the _legal team_ for the .NET foundation (who runs the project that Roman spotted), not just some engineers. -Todd On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi Roman, > > Before we first publicly used the name, we were in touch with th

Re: Project Kudu. .NET edition

Hi Roman, Before we first publicly used the name, we were in touch with that project team, and got permission to do so. Additionally, I think the project scope/purpose is different enough that it wouldn't cause confusion. (fwiw based on tweets, I think there is also a fast food chain in Saudi Arab

Re: Project Website Template

On Friday, November 20, 2015, Ted Dunning wrote: > Generally pretty nice. > > This is clearly based on a Jekyll example from somewhere. That does raise > the question Julian had about license. > > Jekyll has the option to generate a basic site, and the style is mostly based on how Zepplin did th

Re: Project Website Template

Generally pretty nice. This is clearly based on a Jekyll example from somewhere. That does raise the question Julian had about license. On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > On Nov 19, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > > The strawman of the template is avai

Re: Project Website Template

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > The strawman of the template is available in the newly created git > repository > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/apache-website-template.git And mirrored at https://github.com/apache/apache-website-template

Re: Project Website Template

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I had the same thought when I built Calcite’s site based on jekyll >> (actually cloned from Orc’s site). Thanks for making this template — I’m >> sure it will be helpfu

Re: Project Website Template

> On Nov 7, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> I also think it would be useful to provide a template for maven/java based >> projects. There would be a pom.xml, module/pom.xml and >> module/org/apache/foo/Foo.java, and just enou

Re: Project Website Template

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 > > I had the same thought when I built Calcite’s site based on jekyll > (actually cloned from Orc’s site). Thanks for making this template — I’m > sure it will be helpful to new projects. > > We should make it clear that it is optional, of

Re: Project Website Template

+1. The Jekyll flow is great and has a low learning curve. On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:12 PM, larry mccay wrote: > +1 - this would be a great resource for bootstrapping a new project! > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I had the same thought when I built Calcit

Re: Project Website Template

+1 - this would be a great resource for bootstrapping a new project! On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 > > I had the same thought when I built Calcite’s site based on jekyll > (actually cloned from Orc’s site). Thanks for making this template — I’m > sure it will be helpful

Re: Project Website Template

+1 I had the same thought when I built Calcite’s site based on jekyll (actually cloned from Orc’s site). Thanks for making this template — I’m sure it will be helpful to new projects. We should make it clear that it is optional, of course. But when Calcite entered the incubator there were ent

Re: Project Website Template

Easy is good The Jekyll work flow has worked well in the project I have mentored. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:04, Luciano Resende wrote: > > I have just spent a day or so building a new podling website based on > Jekyll and I tried to model it as a template, where a new pro

Re: Project Idea - TagSheets

Hi, On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Scott McFarland wrote: > ...Does anyone think that this concept is one that > Apache would want to develop and promulgate?.. To clarify, the Apache Software Foundation itself does not develop things - it "only" provides a space for its projects to do so. There

Re: Project Idea - TagSheets

Scott, Do you have a codebase and community for TagSheets, or is just an idea at this point? If not, you should probably work on building those prior to proposing it as an incubator project. More information on the incubator proposal process can be found here [1]. - Taylor [1] http://incubato

RE: Project Idea - TagSheets

Sorry for my confusion, if you want to see those markup screens, they're visible at http://tagshets.blogspot.com/ . From: hiddenfir...@live.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Project Idea - TagSheets Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 13:43:02 -0400 I watch Analysts put their data into spreadsh

Re: Project Idea - TagSheets

Unfortunately, I think you can not attach files to the mailing list so the attachments need to be somewhere accessible via links. - Henry On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Scott McFarland wrote: > I watch Analysts put their data into spreadsheets – Inventory data, > bug/issues data, other miscell

Re: Project swag store to benefit the ASF

P. Taylor Goetz wrote: Is there any precedent or best practice for setting up a project swag store on something like cafe press? The closest OpenOffice came to this is simply by listing reorder links to promotional material here: http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/art/galleries/logos/index.h

RE: Project swag store to benefit the ASF

A few people have done this over the years. The short answer is a) don't abuse the trademarks (I'd in doubt ask on trademarks@) b) donate any proceeds via fundraising@ (they can help you figure out the best way of seeing up payments) c) accept or implicit thanks for doing "good stuff" If you wa

Re: Project reboot proposals - any guidance?

Hi Nick, I did a somewhat cursory review of the 10 years of emails in the XML Beans archives and have some definite ideas about governance. I don't think that they are for discussion yet - it will be up to the podling community. Regards, Dave On Oct 24, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > H

Re: Project reboot proposals - any guidance?

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Nick Burch wrote: > Do we have any guidance on what a reboot proposal should and shouldn't > contain? Lucy was a reboot. It had withered as a subproject under the Lucene umbrella before coming to the Incubator. The parallels aren't exact, but it's a precedent.

Re: Project reboot proposals - any guidance?

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Christian Grobmeier wrote: But of course it would be interesting for me about the motivations. I mean, the project was almost dead and now a few people want it to be revived. Why? Was the problem in the previous project to less interest? Problems in the community? The pre

Re: Project reboot proposals - any guidance?

Hey Nick I spoke with Tammo about this while we had a virtual coffee recently. However I don't know about similar cases so much. Basically I don't see lot of risk from a legal standpoint and would give my +1 quickly. But of course it would be interesting for me about the motivations. I mean, t

Re: Project websites

CloudStack dev@ should be copied in on this thread. On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Sheng Liang > wrote: > ... > > 1. When shall we redirect cloudstack.org to the Apache project page? > (e.g., http://incubator.apache.org/projec

Re: Project websites

Hi, On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Sheng Liang wrote: ... > 1. When shall we redirect cloudstack.org to the Apache project page? (e.g., > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cloudstack.html) Podlings don't usually use that status page as their homepage, I'd expect cloudstack.org to redirect t

Re: Project shutdown guide?

Daniel Kulp wrote: > Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > What is with user accounts of people who are not active in other > > apache projects and started at the ASF with the retired project? Are > > the accounts closed too? > > > > Any more ideas? > > > > I am +1 for creating a page on the incubator s

Re: Project shutdown guide?

On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 2:56:49 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > What is with user accounts of people who are not active in other > apache projects and started at the ASF with the retired project? Are > the accounts closed too? > > Any more ideas? > > I am +1 for creating a page on the incubat

Re: Project shutdown guide?

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Currently I'd describe it as: >> http://attic.apache.org/process.html > > > So, is a failed incubation project going into the attic? I don't think > so. In addition i don't think

Re: Project shutdown guide?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Currently I'd describe it as: > http://attic.apache.org/process.html So, is a failed incubation project going into the attic? I don't think so. In addition i don't think board needs to approve that, this is incubator business. So my list w

Re: Project shutdown guide?

Currently I'd describe it as: http://attic.apache.org/process.html + * Check copyright checkbox is signed off on. ** If not, then dig in to see if it can be signed off on. *** If so, sign off with current date. *** If not, remove source. Hen On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:

Re: Project Proposal Question

found there, and "advertise" it on this list to see if people are interested. -Bertrand >  -Original Message- > From:   Upayavira [mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk] > Sent:   Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:00 PM Central Standard Time > To:     general@incubator.apache.org &

RE: Project Proposal Question

:Re: Project Proposal Question On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:25 +0300, "Andrus Adamchik" wrote: > Hi Erich, > > There are no formal limitations on what an Apache software can do. While > there is some historical bias towards certain types of projects and > technologi

Re: Project Proposal Question

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:25 +0300, "Andrus Adamchik" wrote: > Hi Erich, > > There are no formal limitations on what an Apache software can do. While > there is some historical bias towards certain types of projects and > technologies here, it is not set in stone or anything. The area of use > can

Re: Project Proposal Question

Hi Erich, There are no formal limitations on what an Apache software can do. While there is some historical bias towards certain types of projects and technologies here, it is not set in stone or anything. The area of use can be as broad or as specific as its creators decide. The only practical

Re: Project category Incubator update

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Gavin wrote: > Can someone take a quick scan and see if it is accurate, or needs updating. > If so , I'll bring it upto date based on any recommended changes. > Pivot As Mentor for Pivot, this reason is that we have not gotten that far yet. Jira is up since I hav

Re: Project category Incubator update

Gavin wrote: > > David, I've had a quick scan of clutch page, I need to grep it some more to > understand what could be active incubating, Everything that is in the table is incubating. > what could be ready for the > attic etc - ie there are projects on there that have seen no action for > year

Re: Project category Incubator update

On 02/02/2009, Gavin wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett Porter > > Sent: Monday, 2 February 2009 12:31 PM > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Project categor

RE: Project category Incubator update

> -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:br...@porterclan.net] On Behalf Of Brett Porter > Sent: Monday, 2 February 2009 12:31 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Project category Incubator update > > > On 02/02/2009, at 1:20 PM, G

Re: Project category Incubator update

On 02/02/2009, at 1:20 PM, Gavin wrote: Below projects are listed in jira category 'Incubator' Can someone take a quick scan and see if it is accurate, or needs updating. If so , I'll bring it upto date based on any recommended changes. Thanks Gav... graduated: Abdera Buildr CouchDB

Re: Project category Incubator update

Gavin wrote: > Below projects are listed in jira category 'Incubator' > > Can someone take a quick scan and see if it is accurate, or needs updating. > If so , I'll bring it upto date based on any recommended changes. Rather than waiting for people to tell you bit-by-bit, i recommend that you syn

Re: Project category Incubator update

CouchDB has graduated. Thanks for taking care of this for us. -Damien On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Gavin wrote: Below projects are listed in jira category 'Incubator' Can someone take a quick scan and see if it is accurate, or needs updating. If so , I'll bring it upto date based on any re

Re: Project Diversity Guidelines

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...One thing that would help, especially in the case of qpid, is to document > whether the committers feel that they are independent. That is, whether they > would continue to contribute to the project on their own time

Re: Project Diversity Guidelines

Meant to add that I'm feeling a chill over the idea of more docs here, so I'll be off back to Qpid and poll our mentors instead :-) Thanks Niclas & Craig, Marnie On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Marnie McCormack < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Craig, > > > One thing that would help, especial

Re: Project Diversity Guidelines

Hi Craig, One thing that would help, especially in the case of qpid, is to document whether the committers feel that they are independent. That is, whether they would continue to contribute to the project on their own time even if their employer reassigned them to a different project. This is a g

Re: Project Diversity Guidelines

Hi Niclas, On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: As for more documentation; I am -0 on that, but I guess Craig and Martijn will probably jump at the opportunity ;o) Well, thanks but no thanks. ;-) My views are similar to yours. Diversity is a subjective thing, and every memb

Re: Project Diversity Guidelines

Hi Niclas, Thanks for your feedback, sincerely. Appreciate the time taken. I'm really not a process junkie and I'm definitely not trying to impose any ideas here. This suggestion is really off the back of a few items coming up during our previous graduation debate which were quite a surprise to u

Re: Project Diversity Guidelines

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Marnie McCormack < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Some of you with long memories may recall previous threads about project > diversity. > > At the end of one such debate, I put forward some ideas about what items > might benefit from some good practice gu

Re: Project status updates

done. Martijn -- Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Project status updates

OK, I saw what you meant: the link on the incubator site points to the wrong directory. I'm updating the site as we speak. Should be live in a couple of hours (if p.a.o. works) Martijn On 7/18/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rcf.html You fo

Re: Project status updates

http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rcf.html You forgot the 's' after projects :-) Martijn On 7/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi robert, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-68 contains a xml file for rcf as well. that's not yet visible on the homepage: h

Re: Project status updates

hi robert, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-68 contains a xml file for rcf as well. that's not yet visible on the homepage: http://incubator.apache.org/project/rcf.html -Matthias On 7/11/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/11/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAI

Re: Project status updates

cool On 7/11/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/11/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2) The RCF project does not yet have an entry on the projects page. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-68 committed - robert --

Re: Project status updates

On 7/11/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2) The RCF project does not yet have an entry on the projects page. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-68 committed - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Project status updates

2) The RCF project does not yet have an entry on the projects page. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-68 -Matthias 3) The log4php project is still listed as retired. This list might be both incorrect and incomplete. BR, Jukka Zitting -

Re: Project status updates

Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, I just cleaned some retired and graduated projects (Heraldry, mod_ftp, wadi, Kabuki) from the Incubator status page and the reporting schedule. I didn't want to touch more recent changes, hoping that the people more involved would take action. The list of missing updates

Re: Project status updates

Wicket is still hosted on the incubator. Until infra has found the time to move Wicket to its rightful place, I won't update the site (I would like it to be possible for people to find Wicket) Martijn -- Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is re

Re: Project status updates

Hi, I'll fix RCF / Trinidad early next week (out of town, soon ;-) ) -M On 7/6/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I just cleaned some retired and graduated projects (Heraldry, mod_ftp, wadi, Kabuki) from the Incubator status page and the reporting schedule. I didn't want to to

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

al Message- From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 7 August 2006 4:41 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator) given the amount of upset caused by names, i think that we should appoint

RE: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

> -Original Message- > From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 7 August 2006 4:41 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator) > > given the amount of upset cau

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

On 8/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. hmm...sounds like we should have some docs that

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

On 8/5/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. +1 I can imagine how frustrating this must be

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

IMO the reason this naming debate hasn't been settled is because of the way in which the change from Blaze to Glasgow was achieved: it was done privately and the result was announced here. I can imagine how frustrating this must be to folks who are new to Apache, but folks here don't like private

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

Martin- yes we solved it recently. But... the process of solving that is not quite clear. I created an issue / task in JIRA for that. I am only refering to the trademark issue; the rest was pretty easy, the community voted on the name. We only ensured that no names with *potential* trademark tro

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

Also if I recall correctly, naming issues can also be solved while in the incbuator... (like adffaces has) Mvgr, Martin Danny Angus wrote: Archit, I'm very happy to here you say so, I certainly don't want to affect your progress through the incubator, in many ways I've unfairly sigled you out

Re: Project Naming (was Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator)

Archit, I'm very happy to here you say so, I certainly don't want to affect your progress through the incubator, in many ways I've unfairly sigled you out as an example of a prectice I feel strongly about. Unfortunately I will be away, offline, for the next four days, but if it is still relevant

Re: Project templates

On 6/13/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/13/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:02:42PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > >> > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >I will try to

Re: Project templates

On 6/13/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:02:42PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > >> > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon > >> > > >> > It

Re: Project templates

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:02:42PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > >> > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon > >> > > >> > It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x

Re: Project templates

robert burrell donkin wrote: >> > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon >> > >> > It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x. > > both would be best > > a lot of projects are still maven 1. what

Re: Project templates

On 6/9/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon > > It probably makes far more sense to make that Mave

Re: Project templates

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon > > It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x. -- justin *cheer*! Go, Paul, go! :-) LSD

Re: Project templates

On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon It probably makes far more sense to make that Maven 2.x. -- justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: Project templates

On 6/7/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon based on what we've put together for Synapse. If I can persuade the Synapse team to help me it might happen. even if it's not complete, a starting point would be useful I

Re: Project templates

I will try to get a template based on Maven 1.x ready for ApacheCon based on what we've put together for Synapse. If I can persuade the Synapse team to help me it might happen. I don't believe that we should view these templates as normative but rather as a useful aid and also that they should be

Re: Project templates

On 6/3/06, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Paul Fremantle wrote: >> I have no argument with someone providing such a template, but I would >> strongly object to any implication that Maven was mandated. We are not >> going to endorse Maven as the official build tool for ASF Java pr

Re: Project templates

Paul Fremantle wrote: I have no argument with someone providing such a template, but I would strongly object to any implication that Maven was mandated. We are not going to endorse Maven as the official build tool for ASF Java projects. Sure, and an Ant project shell can do all of that, too

Re: Project templates

I have no argument with someone providing such a template, but I would strongly object to any implication that Maven was mandated. We are not going to endorse Maven as the official build tool for ASF Java projects. Sure, and an Ant project shell can do all of that, too, probably sharing most o

Re: project - ibatis

The iBATIS project is no longer in the incubator, but if you are interested in participating, please feel free to join the mailing lists (http://ibatis.apache.org/mailinglists.html) and get invovled - lots of questions to answer there, for sure! There are several issues in JIRA (http://ibatis.apac

Re: project status file for incubated projects (Was: svn commit: r355962 - /incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/index.html)

thx On Dec 12, 2005, at 12:00 AM, David Crossley wrote: The table is supposed to continue to point to the project's incubation status file. Each status file for incubated projects should say that is is finished, and link to its real website. -David Author: geirm Date: Sun Dec 11 08:07:17 200

Re: Project Infrastructure Platform (Discussed at ApacheCon)

I have been present during your talks with Noel and others about incubating your project. Are there any updates yet? Yes, we started a project to do a clean up of the code base. This will give us a better starting position if we get the positive decision from our board to go on with incubation.

Re: Project Infrastructure Platform (Discussed at ApacheCon)

I would hope that a project like this could be resolving many issues the ASF currently has with infrastructure being hopelessly overloaded with work Shouldn't there be a way to incubate this project (with some small work for infrastructure) and then in the end hopefully infrastructure would ha

Re: Project Infrastructure Platform (Discussed at ApacheCon)

Hi Matthias :-) I have been present during your talks with Noel and others about incubating your project. Are there any updates yet? You already said that the software is a Java EE app, that uses lots of ASF projects, but do you have some architectural papers ? :-) -Matthias On Tue, 2005-08-30

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

Reading over it, I think it actually says that. I can attest to the fact that beer was involved in the initial design process of this thing... On Jul 28, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Larry Meadors wrote: I think that was to be a part of the 1.1 release? Larry On 7/28/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

I think that was to be a part of the 1.1 release? Larry On 7/28/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You forgot to mention the part where it will byte-weave the compiled > diff into the classfile... > > geir > > On Jul 22, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > > Subvertive

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

You forgot to mention the part where it will byte-weave the compiled diff into the classfile... geir On Jul 22, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Upayavira wrote: Subvertive Incubator Proposal -- Here is a proposal for an incubator project that originally arose over beers at ApacheC

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

+1. Looks very interesting! Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

Uhm, +1? ;-) Larry On 7/22/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ROTFL :) :) :) For a second i was trying to figure out if i overslept > and today is April 1st :) > > -- dims > > On 7/22/05, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Subvertive Incubator Proposal > >

Re: Project Proposal: Subvertive

ROTFL :) :) :) For a second i was trying to figure out if i overslept and today is April 1st :) -- dims On 7/22/05, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Subvertive Incubator Proposal > -- > Here is a proposal for an incubator project that originally arose over > beers at

Re: Project proposal

Biggest seems to be: http://opensource.org/OSA/ It seems to be both for people and for projects. The judges seem to be: ESR + "Jeremy Allison, Larry Augustin, Jim Gettys, Keith Packard, and Guido van Rossum. Legate status was conferred on Tim O'Reilly of O'Reilly and Associates and to David Berl

  1   2   >