Also if I recall correctly, naming issues can also be solved while in the incbuator... (like
adffaces has)
Mvgr,
Martin
Danny Angus wrote:
Archit,
I'm very happy to here you say so, I certainly don't want to affect
your progress through the incubator, in many ways I've unfairly sigled
you out as an example of a prectice I feel strongly about.
Unfortunately I will be away, offline, for the next four days, but if
it is still relevant I will be happy to take up your kind offer and
put in time helping to find an acceptable, strike that, a good name.
d.
On 04/08/06, Archit Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The project formerly known as Blaze changed its name to Glasgow based on
previous feedback and decided to follow Apache precedent (e.g. Tuscany).
Apparently there are strong objections to this precendent. In our
discussions, the group did come up with some ingenious names for the
project, but most had legal concerns or conflicted with existing
software. Glasgow was the winner mostly by process of elimination.
Danny, I'm confident that none of the committers are particularly
attached to the name and no one wants to see the proposal sidetracked
over the name of the project. So, we welcome any help in selecting a
name that does not have any software trademarks in the USPTO and isn't
connected to other relevant software projects.
-- Archit
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
