Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> I very much like the idea of the PPMC -> Incubator PMC relationship
>>> modeling the board whenever possible.
>> Keeping in mind that the PPMC has no actual standing, so the vote still
>> requires the standard 3 +1 and
On Jun 6, 2008, at 1:08 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 06 June 2008 09:26, Craig L Russell wrote:
Just so I'm clear on the proposal, if the PPMC votes in private, and
no Mentors or PMC members vote, the vote passes with 15 non-binding
+1
votes, and no binding votes, then lazy consensus
Henri Yandell wrote:
> I very much like the idea of the PPMC -> Incubator PMC relationship
> modeling the board whenever possible.
Keeping in mind that the PPMC has no actual standing, so the vote still
requires the standard 3 +1 and more +1 than -1 from PMC members. Which is
why we always encou
Justin,
To summarize you are proposing the following change:
> After completing the vote on the PPMC list, the proposer
> calls a vote on the Incubator PMC private list
to:
> After completing the vote on the PPMC list, the proposer
> *sends a note to* the Incubator PMC private list
And change:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to:
> ---
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding
> the vote email with a cover s
Just so I'm clear on the proposal, if the PPMC votes in private, and
no Mentors or PMC members vote, the vote passes with 15 non-binding +1
votes, and no binding votes, then lazy consensus (no +1 vote from any
PMC member) admits a new committer to Apache?
Thanks,
Craig
On Jun 3, 2008, at
El jue, 05-06-2008 a las 08:21 -0400, Jim Jagielski escribió:
> On Jun 3, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > ---
> >
> > I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to:
> > ---
> > Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> > Incubator private list.
+1
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
> ---
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding th
Same here. +1.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> I very much like the idea of the PPMC -> Incubator PMC relationship
> modeling the board whenever possible.
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
---
I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to:
---
Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the
vote email with a cover statement that
+1.
I very much like the idea of the PPMC -> Incubator PMC relationship
modeling the board whenever possible.
Hen
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to:
> ---
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) li
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you see infra checking that the account requests that they
> receive have been voted on according to this procedure?
The account reqs from the PPMC should CC Incubator PMC. So, the
responsibility is on the Inc
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I like the concept of expanding this for committers
> as well for Incubation, so there. I don't like needless 'dual
> voting', but I do want the IPMC to have the chance to execute
> oversight
+1 to your propos
+1
I struggled a lot with the current guide to do two things:
1. Give the PPMC experience in doing things that as a PMC they will
have to do, while at the same time,
2. Give the incubator PMC oversight and the ability to step in if the
PPMC acts incorrectly.
So, assuming both committer a
Any practice for a podling's PPMC that exercises or simulates the processes
expected of a mature PMC is worth adopting.
+1
Alex
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> +1
>
> -jean
>
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/g
+1
-jean
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
---
Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the
vote email with a cover statement that this vote i
+1
Niall
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
> ---
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forward
+1
I'll make the edits.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
> ---
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> Incubator private list. The notice is a separa
+1
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
> ---
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding th
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
[...]
> I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to:
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> Incubator priv
I would be quite happy with the below. It reads sufficiently
straightforwardly.
Regards, Upayavira
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:29 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
> ---
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice poste
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick question, haven't thought thru, but raising it here...Does it make
> sense to align voting in a new committer with
> "Voting in a new PPMC member"? (on the same page)?
Makes sense to me. The policy for IPMC oversi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Quick question, haven't thought thru, but raising it here...Does it make sense
to align voting in a new committer with
"Voting in a new PPMC member"? (on the same page)?
thanks,
dims
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
| Currently on http://incubator.apache.o
23 matches
Mail list logo
