-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Quick question, haven't thought thru, but raising it here...Does it make sense to align voting in a new committer with "Voting in a new PPMC member"? (on the same page)?
thanks, dims Justin Erenkrantz wrote: | Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have: | --- | Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the | Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the | vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the | podling's private list. Many consider this approach to be best | practice. After completing the vote on the PPMC list, the proposer | calls a vote on the Incubator PMC private list, summarizing the | discussion and vote, with a reference to the archived discussion and | vote threads by the PPMC. The Incubator vote is done even if there are | three +1 votes from Incubator PMC members during the PPMC vote, in | order to give all Incubator PMC members a chance to express their | support or disapproval after seeing the PPMC discussion and vote | results. Note that only the Incubator PMC members can see the | Incubator private discussion, and the podling's Mentors should review | all Incubator PMC feedback with the PPMC. Moreover, only Apache | members may review the private PPMC list (this is normally not an | issue since most Incubator PMC members are Apache members). | --- | | I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to: | --- | Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the | Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the | vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the | podling's private list. Many consider this approach to be best | practice. After completing the vote on the PPMC list, the proposer | *sends a note to* the Incubator PMC private list, summarizing the | discussion and vote, with a reference to the archived discussion and | vote threads by the PPMC. *Any member of the Incubator PMC can ACK | the receipt of the vote. This starts a 72-hour window for lazy | consensus. After 72 hours and no requests by any Incubator PMC member | for a full vote by the Incubator PMC, the committer request is | approved by the Incubator PMC and the PPMC can start the committer | invitation process.* | --- | | This intentionally follows the procedure for adding a PMC member wrt | full ASF board. I like the concept of expanding this for committers | as well for Incubation, so there. I don't like needless 'dual | voting', but I do want the IPMC to have the chance to execute | oversight. | | WDYT? -- justin | | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) iD8DBQFIRauEgNg6eWEDv1kRAhR+AJ4y9Lj4QFHbLWzJ+WS6xs2pTH20CwCdGlqw /kXX8IPkGwl+8WIuKzg+AGU= =ItmI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
