Re: Incubator project status website failed to build since July 7th

Thanks Dave! Best Regards, Yu On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 20:28, Dave Fisher wrote: > Here is the fix which has worked its way through the clutch and website > process. > > Author: wave > Date: Wed Aug 2 12:19:32 2023 > New Revision: 1911409 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911409&view=re

Re: Incubator project status website failed to build since July 7th

Here is the fix which has worked its way through the clutch and website process. Author: wave Date: Wed Aug 2 12:19:32 2023 New Revision: 1911409 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911409&view=rev Log: Update the minimum podling count fr

Incubator project status website failed to build since July 7th

Hi Justin, As titled, I noticed this when trying to update the Celeborn and Paimon project status through SVN [1]. Checking the build job [2], it has been failing ever since July 7th. With some further checking, I found that the initial issue was introduced by a typo when updating pony mail statu

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-271) SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Mclean closed INCUBATOR-271. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Moved to INFRA. > SeaTunnel Incubator project request

[jira] [Assigned] (INCUBATOR-271) SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Justin Mclean reassigned INCUBATOR-271: --- Assignee: Justin Mclean > SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the Git

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-271) SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service

help me close this? > SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service > -- > > Key: INCUBATOR-271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/b

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-271) SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17464314#comment-17464314 ] Calvin Kirs commented on INCUBATOR-271: --- Thank you~ > SeaTunnel In

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-271) SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service

NFRA JIRA for this. > SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service > -- > > Key: INCUBATOR-271 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/j

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-271) SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service

Calvin Kirs created INCUBATOR-271: - Summary: SeaTunnel Incubator project request for the GitHub repositories moving service Key: INCUBATOR-271 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-271

Re: Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

Hi All, SST is primarily not a STEP files import tool/API even though it is able to do so. It is going to be RDF/OWL API + GIT like revision based repository environment that allows to work with CAD/CAx RDF data in a distributed way. It has a lot of generic RDF capabilities but is optimized for

Re: Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

Hello Chris, Just before I responded about STEP geometry. Another potential application is about assembly structures. Today likely all reasonable CAD systems can generate STEP files with assembly information. SST can already import XML files with assemblies (but not yet p21 files with assemblie

Re: Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

Hello Nathan, Right, STEP geometry is one of the things we could do with SST. We are just finishing with a higher level ontology that is directly derived from STEP geometry models (written in the Express modelling language) and that is directly integrated in SST as "early binding". So an applic

Re: Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 6:39 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi Lothar, > > after a call with you and comparing that to the proposal, I think it > would be great if you could explain a little bit more on a concrete > example what SST does, which problem it solves and how it differs from > existing so

Re: Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

or the new SST incubator > project proposal; see below. > So far I contacted Justin Mclean and Christofer Dutz and they are > considering to become mentors. > > Best Regards > Lothar > > > === Abstract === > > SST (Semantic STEP Technology) is an optimiz

Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

Dear IPMC members, We are looking for a Champion and Mentors for the new SST incubator project proposal; see below. So far I contacted Justin Mclean and Christofer Dutz and they are considering to become mentors. Best Regards Lothar === Abstract === SST (Semantic STEP Technology) is an

Re: Trying to become incubator project..

Hi, In order to be accepted as an incubating project you need to put together a proposal. The Incubator PMC would also have to agree that the project is a good fit for the ASF. I would suggest you take a look at this [1] and some other incubator proposals [2] (newer ones are at the top). If y

Trying to become incubator project..

framework with state. I named it eZ framework because it is very easy to use and not much to learn. I want my project to be used by many. So I am applying to be a incubator project. License is LGPL now, but I can change it to APACHE license if needed. It is unique because it offers state to unburden

Trying to become incubator project..

Hello, This is Park from Korea. I made a C++ server side web development framework with state. I named it eZ framework because it is very easy to use and not much to learn. I want my project to be used by many. So I am applying to be a incubator project. License is LGPL now, but I can change it

Re: Incubator Project Websites

Hi, Thanks Justin! Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 1:36 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Apache DLab community wanted from me to point > > https://dlab.opensource.epam.com/ as their website at podling page. > > It should move to be hosted on ASF infrastructure see [1] (a

Re: Incubator Project Websites

Hi, > Apache DLab community wanted from me to point > https://dlab.opensource.epam.com/ as their website at podling page. It should move to be hosted on ASF infrastructure see [1] (a little out of date and need to be updated but has the main points). Thanks, Justin 1. https://incubator.apache.

Incubator Project Websites

Hi, Apache DLab community wanted from me to point https://dlab.opensource.epam.com/ as their website at podling page. I've checked all the podling definitions and just a few of them place at a domain rather than apache. I've mentioned to consider them to move/redirect their website into http://dla

Re: New name for our incubator project

On 07/02/18 14:37, Joo Yeon Kim wrote: > Hello. > > We have been recently accepted as an incubator project: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CoralProposal > > However, the name "Coral" has been flagged by another project, > and we are in the process of choosi

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

Hi, > In Unix operating systems devices are files. For the I2C bus the device id > would /dev/i2c-0.(I do not believe this would be different on a PI vs and > Arduino). It a little different Arduino’s don't have an OS but a set of API/libraries you use. Lots of small devices don't have OSes or

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

Edward, you might not be aware that the Incubator is not a place to "start" new projects from scratch, but to educate communities in the Apache Way of operating as sustainable communities. We accept existing communities with existing projects... That said; I generally agree with your "ambition" an

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:40 AM, wrote: > Hi all, > > Sounds quite interesting :) It might also be an idea to provide a home for > implementations of other hardware that can drive GPIO pins and can control > similar sensors and other devices. I'm thinking of an Arduino, or something > like an ES

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

Hi all, Sounds quite interesting :) It might also be an idea to provide a home for implementations of other hardware that can drive GPIO pins and can control similar sensors and other devices. I'm thinking of an Arduino, or something like an ESP8266. These are devices that are much simpler (and ch

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Edward Capriolo > wrote: > > I know IOT is a super hot buzz word but here me out. This is not one of > > those attempts to brand a some random piece of software as IOT :) > > Yeah, right ;-) > > > When wo

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > I know IOT is a super hot buzz word but here me out. This is not one of > those attempts to brand a some random piece of software as IOT :) Yeah, right ;-) > When working with hardware there are a few common protocols. SPI, I2C, and > GPI

[DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

I know IOT is a super hot buzz word but here me out. This is not one of those attempts to brand a some random piece of software as IOT :) When working with hardware there are a few common protocols. SPI, I2C, and GPIO. That are supported by a majority of the electronics http://www.mouser.com/Produ

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

I'd Ike to be added as well. -Taylor > On Dec 21, 2016, at 7:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > I was able to get myself added to the PMC list on INCUBATOR which fixed > permissions on the JIRA instance. If anyone else wants access, drop a > note. We don't often see tickets created, bu

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

+1 plz On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:50 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Added! > > For anyone I add, If you're on the IPMC I'm adding you to the PMC group so > you can add others as well. > > John > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:36 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Add me as well. > > > > Justin

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

Added! For anyone I add, If you're on the IPMC I'm adding you to the PMC group so you can add others as well. John On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:36 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Add me as well. > > Justin > > - > To unsubscrib

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

Hi, Add me as well. Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

Johan, You're not presently an IPMC member, nor an incubator committer. I'd be happy to add you as a contributor though. John On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:57 PM Johan Edstrom wrote: > Could you add me too? Joed > > Sent from my pressure cooker. > > > On Dec 21, 2016, at 17:29, John D. Ament wro

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

Could you add me too? Joed Sent from my pressure cooker. > On Dec 21, 2016, at 17:29, John D. Ament wrote: > > Done! You're on the PMC! > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:26 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> plz add rvs >> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:25 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >>> All, >

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

Done! You're on the PMC! On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:26 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > plz add rvs > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:25 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > All, > > > > I was able to get myself added to the PMC list on INCUBATOR which fixed > > permissions on the JIRA instance. If anyone e

Re: Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

plz add rvs On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 4:25 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I was able to get myself added to the PMC list on INCUBATOR which fixed > permissions on the JIRA instance. If anyone else wants access, drop a > note. We don't often see tickets created, but may be good to get more >

Anyone else want JIRA access to the INCUBATOR project?

All, I was able to get myself added to the PMC list on INCUBATOR which fixed permissions on the JIRA instance. If anyone else wants access, drop a note. We don't often see tickets created, but may be good to get more people helping to field them. John

Re: Wiki Access - for new incubator project

context: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-Access-for-new-incubator-project-tp49334.html Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

Wiki Access - for new incubator project

Hello I am working on a project which intends to apply for Apache Incubating,please give wiki access to me. Thanks. name in the wiki : chenliang613 Regards Liang -- View this message in context: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-Access-for-new-incubator-project

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

dencies are currently > GPL/CDDL dual licensed. > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM Martin Gainty > wrote: > >>>> Looking for procedures for transferring control of currently > un-maintained glassfis

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Reza Rahman wrote: > Yep, understood. We will give it an honest effort > No doubt, we appreciate the sincerity. Note that there are multiple aspect that would require license grants and provisions that complicate any Java-ecosystem grant to the ASF. It isn't str

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

ncies are currently > GPL/CDDL dual licensed. > >>> > >>> John > >>> > >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM Martin Gainty > wrote: > >>>> Looking for procedures for transferring control of currently > un-maintained glassfish J2EE

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

2016 at 3:17 PM Martin Gainty wrote: >> Looking for procedures for transferring control of currently un-maintained >> glassfish J2EE Server from Oracle to ASF incubator project >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Martin Gainty >> >> >> Subject: Re: [gf-use

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

ng an SGA for the glassfish >>> codebase. Not to mention that all dependencies are currently GPL/CDDL dual >>> licensed. >>> >>> John >>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM Martin Gainty wrote: >>>> Looking for

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

transferring control of currently >> un-maintained glassfish J2EE Server from Oracle to ASF incubator project >> >> Thanks and Regards >> Martin Gainty >> >> >> Subject: Re: [gf-users] Re: Farewell to Oracle >> To: mgai...@hotmail.com >> From: r

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

om Oracle to ASF incubator project > > Thanks and Regards > Martin Gainty > > > Subject: Re: [gf-users] Re: Farewell to Oracle > To: mgai...@hotmail.com > From: reza_rah...@lycos.com > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:56:02 -0500 > > > > > > >

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

of currently un-maintained > glassfish J2EE Server from Oracle to ASF incubator project > > Thanks and Regards > Martin Gainty > > > Subject: Re: [gf-users] Re: Farewell to Oracle > To: mgai...@hotmail.com > From: reza_rah...@lycos.com > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:56:02 -0

Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

Looking for procedures for transferring control of currently un-maintained glassfish J2EE Server from Oracle to ASF incubator project Thanks and Regards Martin Gainty Subject: Re: [gf-users] Re: Farewell to Oracle To: mgai...@hotmail.com From: reza_rah...@lycos.com Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13

Re: how can i find PMC Chair for a incubator project

Hi team, I'm looking for the team/person who are entitled to grant administrative access to a committer account so that the account can create new CI jobs on apache jenkins at builds.apache.org. I was directed to this mail list, could you let me know if i can ask for your help, please? Thanks! Mi

Re: how can i find PMC Chair for a incubator project

Michael, This is something to ask of your mentors. Removing dev@comm (bcc) and moving to general. they can either grant or ask for karma on private MLs. John On Dec 1, 2015 03:40, "Michael Wu" wrote: > Hi Mentors, > > I'm a member of project "incubator-eagle", I need to find PMC Chair to > gr

RE: Question on managing incubator project

Thanks, it looks like I used http instead of https. Roberta Marton -Original Message- From: Luciano Resende [mailto:luckbr1...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:32 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Question on managing incubator project It seems you are on

Re: Question on managing incubator project

It seems you are on the incubator group. By any chance, did you use svn co http:// instead of svn co https:// ? On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Roberta Marton wrote: > I am fairly new to the Apache world and have been given the opportunity to > be release manager for Apache Trafodion. > > I h

Question on managing incubator project

I am fairly new to the Apache world and have been given the opportunity to be release manager for Apache Trafodion. I have spent countless hours reading the Apache documentation; the documentation is very thorough but I have some questions and am hoping this forum can help. As part of releasi

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

will work on getting the infra JIRAs created. Thanks, Thejas -- Forwarded message -- From: Thejas Nair Date: Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:30 AM Subject: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project To: Cc: oo...@comp.nus.edu.sg The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

Thanks for the feedback Bertrand! Yes, I agree it makes sense to start with a single user and dev mailing list. I got this feedback during the proposal phase, but I forgot to update the proposal. On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Olem

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

+1 On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Thejas Nair wrote: > The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on > feedback in the proposal thread. > > This vote is proposing the inclusion of Apache Singa as incubator project. > The vote will run for at least 72 hours. &g

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

+1 Regards, Alan > On Mar 10, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Thejas Nair wrote: > > The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on > feedback in the proposal thread. > > This vote is proposing the inclusion of Apache Singa as incubator project. > The vote will run

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

Thanks for the input on the name. Naming is always tricky! We can look into that as the project goes through incubation and before it graduates. Apache guideline on naming - http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Olemis Lang wrote: > On 3/10/15, Thejas

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Olemis Lang wrote: > ...I do not know if this matters at all but JFYI , <> is considered > as an obscene word by native Spanish speakers in quite a few regions It does matter in terms of "marketing" IMO. Also, dunno if that's been discussed already and it's

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

On 3/10/15, Thejas Nair wrote: > The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on > feedback in the proposal thread. > I do not know if this matters at all but JFYI , <> is considered as an obscene word by native Spanish speakers in quite a few regions . [...] -- Regards, Olemi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

ty is > > important for long term success of a project. I think that should be a > > criteria for graduation from incubator. > > I think it is going to be more easier to find new contributors as an Apache > > incubator project. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 10

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

Nair wrote: > Thanks for raising this issue. I agree that committer diversity is > important for long term success of a project. I think that should be a > criteria for graduation from incubator. > I think it is going to be more easier to find new contributors as an Apache > in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

Thanks for raising this issue. I agree that committer diversity is important for long term success of a project. I think that should be a criteria for graduation from incubator. I think it is going to be more easier to find new contributors as an Apache incubator project. On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

arch 10, 2015 at 7:33 > The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on > feedback in the proposal thread. > > This vote is proposing the inclusion of Apache Singa as incubator project. > The vote will run for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Accept Apache Singa

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

+1 Alan. Thejas Nair <mailto:thejas.n...@gmail.com> March 10, 2015 at 7:33 The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on feedback in the proposal thread. This vote is proposing the inclusion of Apache Singa as incubator project. The vote will run for at least 72

[VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on feedback in the proposal thread. This vote is proposing the inclusion of Apache Singa as incubator project. The vote will run for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Accept Apache Singa into the Incubator [ ] +0 Don’t care. [ ] -1 Don’t

Re: Request for ContributorsGroup access for updating Incubator project status

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Selvamohan Neethiraj wrote: > Can someone add my wiki user account (Selvamohan Neethiraj) Done. (Wiki ID includes space.) Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator

Request for ContributorsGroup access for updating Incubator project status

I am trying to update the Apache Ranger (incubating) project status in the Wiki. Can someone add my wiki user account (Selvamohan Neethiraj) to ContributorsGroup for me to be able to edit the Apache Incubator Wiki ? Thanks, Selva- signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP usin

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

My apologies. Hal > -Original Message- > From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 11:10 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project > > It will be cool to see a XA

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

guides/proposal.html#formulating > > the Discuss option just helps everyone look at your proposal a little bit > better and determine if there's any gotchas. For example, I'm surprised to > see a new incubator project using SVN. > > - Can you list out your issue tracking pr

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 8:59 PM > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project > > > > I think so. > > > > There's a few things that you want to iron out first, before people > >

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

4 8:59 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project > > I think so. > > There's a few things that you want to iron out first, before people > start voting on this. > > - 3 is generally the "minimum" num

[DISCUSS] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Abstract OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the development of Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC) Systems in a variety of languages. In general the work is at least consistent with or actually conformant to the OASIS XACML Standard. Proposal Generally the work fall

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

ifference. - You may want to review this section to get a better understanding of the goals: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#formulating the Discuss option just helps everyone look at your proposal a little bit better and determine if there's any gotchas. For example, I&#x

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

03 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project > > Hal, > > Per customs, would you mind if we cancel this and start with a > [DISCUSS] thread about OpenAZ? It's unclear if you meant this to be a > vote or something. > > J

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

g >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project >> >> Could you add more description on what is PEP and PDP and other >> acronyms used in the proposal? If it is not directly relevant maybe you >> can rephrase it to more generic analogy. >> >&g

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

4 4:31 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project > > Could you add more description on what is PEP and PDP and other > acronyms used in the proposal? If it is not directly relevant maybe you > can rephrase it to more generic analo

RE: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

4 5:03 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project > > Hal, > > Per customs, would you mind if we cancel this and start with a > [DISCUSS] thread about OpenAZ? It's unclear if you meant this to be a > vote or so

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Hal, Per customs, would you mind if we cancel this and start with a [DISCUSS] thread about OpenAZ? It's unclear if you meant this to be a vote or something. John On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Hal Lockhart wrote: > Abstract > > OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

It'e really unlikely I will be able to contribute in any way to this any time soon, but I think it would be awesome if this was at apache. When I tried to investigate xacml a few years ago the major stumbling block I found was not being able to look at any reasonable implementation. (I rememb

Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Could you add more description on what is PEP and PDP and other acronyms used in the proposal? If it is not directly relevant maybe you can rephrase it to more generic analogy. Thanks, Henry On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Hal Lockhart wrote: > Abstract > > OpenAz is a project to create tools

[PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project

Abstract OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the development of Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC) Systems in a variety of languages. In general the work is at least consistent with or actually conformant to the OASIS XACML Standard. Proposal Generally the work fall

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Hi Mark Perfect! -Anatole 2014-11-04 15:08 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > Please count me in as mentor. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > On Tuesday, 4 November 2014, 13:39, Anatole Tresch > wrote: > > > Oh, sorry for the confusion. That will be the case, of course. I will > > remove the project

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Please count me in as mentor. LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday, 4 November 2014, 13:39, Anatole Tresch wrote: > > Oh, sorry for the confusion. That will be the case, of course. I will > remove the project from Github, when the incubator is accepted ;) > And also to say it franckly: I really see A

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Oh, sorry for the confusion. That will be the case, of course. I will remove the project from Github, when the incubator is accepted ;) And also to say it franckly: I really see Apache as a great chance not as an emergency solution (because the EE config JSR has not been done). I am personally quit

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Hi Anatole, On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Tresch, Anatole wrote: > ...The difference between initial and core developers was that the code > contribution > is completely done from my personal GitHub repo Not sure what you mean - just to clarify, once the project is accepted in the Incubat

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:57 AM, David Blevins wrote: > ...Provided it's the community leading the JSR and not the JSR leading the > community, I think we're a go for Incubation It's not right for anyone but the community to lead an Apache project, so I trust the fine mentors of this new proje

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

+1 that is exactly what I think as well ;) 2014-11-04 2:57 GMT+01:00 David Blevins : > I'm happy to champion and endorse for inclusion in the Incubator as long as > the foremost focus is creating a functioning, lasting and healthy ASF > community and any JSR/JCP points always second. > > I do no

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

I'm happy to champion and endorse for inclusion in the Incubator as long as the foremost focus is creating a functioning, lasting and healthy ASF community and any JSR/JCP points always second. I do not think these goals are mutually exclusive, in fact I think the opposite; the world could benefit

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Thanks Jean-Louis. I am sure there is enough work where you can help us ;) 2014-11-03 22:13 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > Thanks Anatole. > You were the one pushing the JSR so I wanted to be sure about the purpose > of this proposal. > Sound very interesting to me. > > Looking forward to hel

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Thanks Anatole. You were the one pushing the JSR so I wanted to be sure about the purpose of this proposal. Sound very interesting to me. Looking forward to help if needed. Jean-Louis 2014-11-03 18:18 GMT+01:00 Tresch, Anatole : > Hi Jean-Louis > > unfortunately I was a bit deferred in receivin

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

> > I wouldn't list TomEE as sponsor, unless your intention is to become a > sub-project of TomEE. If you look at the history of proposals at [1] > you'll see that most proposals request that the incubator be the sponsor. David Blevins is enough. 2014-11-03 18:46 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > Hi

Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Thanks very much for the help. And nope, i did not yet sign anything... Will check that out asap... - Anatole Tresch Glärnischweg 10 8620 Wetzikon Tel +41 (43) 317 05 30 - Send from Mobile > Am 03.11.2014 um 18:46 schrieb "John D. Ament" : > > Hi Anatole, > > That's part of what the incubator

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Hi Anatole, That's part of what the incubator is here for. :-) First step, create an incubator wiki account http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ and second step send an email to general@i.a.o asking to be made a contributor to the wiki. You'll need this if your proposal is accepted anyways to updat

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Hi Jean-Louis unfortunately I was a bit deferred in receiving this mail thread here. So sorry for the delay ;) > I do think it's an interested and important topic. > > Was wondering what's Anatole position as the Configuration JSR as been > deferred from Java EE 8. This JSR was targeting mainly

Re: Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

Hi John I am still figuring out a bit how things work here in Apache (running a JSR for me currently is more easy ;) ), so anything that is wrong, it's perfect to just tell me, so we can fix everything. So summarizing: -I add you as a mentor (great! Thanks.) -Add it (or let add it) to

Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

That was definitely the purpose of my comment. Dunno which one should be the target and if it's required at all. Just that having forces spread on 3 projects (at least in Apache) to manage configuration does not seem to me appropriated. Btw, commons-configuration is currently in proper section, so

Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

2014-11-03 9:13 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > I do think it's an interested and important topic. > > Was wondering what's Anatole position as the Configuration JSR as been > deferred from Java EE 8. > Even if Mark and Gerhard are also part of DeltaSpike, that'd be great to > avoid having many d

Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

I do think it's an interested and important topic. Was wondering what's Anatole position as the Configuration JSR as been deferred from Java EE 8. Even if Mark and Gerhard are also part of DeltaSpike, that'd be great to avoid having many different configuration projects in Apache and then splittin

  1   2   3   4   5   >