Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-04 Thread Shane Curcuru
It's great to see some new ideas to make reporting simpler for podlings! Xuanwo wrote on 2/3/25 8:14 AM: ...snip... My proposed workflow: - Keep genrated reports at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/reports/ To provide perspective on a few of the questions and replies:

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - > On Feb 3, 2025, at 7:04 PM, tison wrote: > > I'm considering reuse the apache/incubator repo and migrate the > scripts [1] under tools [2]. > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/ > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator/tree/master/tools If you do this then be

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread tison
I'm considering reuse the apache/incubator repo and migrate the scripts [1] under tools [2]. [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/ [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator/tree/master/tools In the current process, there are several actions requiring an authed author (e.g., [

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I'm starting this thread to discuss whether it is a good idea to migrate the > incubator report workflow to a GitHub-based system. Our current workflow is > Confluence-based and involves many manual tasks. I also find Confluence > difficult to use, and several other IPMC members seem to s

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Feb 3, 2025, at 5:29 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > I think there is probably a requirement to store the reports in ASF > svn but the idea of automating some of the generation tasks is > probably a good item to discuss. > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 14:16, Xuanwo wrote: >> >> Hey, everyone >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread tison
Porter > Software Engineer > He/Him/His > > IBM > > > From: Xuanwo > Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 at 06:14 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github > Hey, everyone > > I'm starting t

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread Jason Porter
Sounds like a good idea to me. -- Jason Porter Software Engineer He/Him/His IBM From: Xuanwo Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 at 06:14 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github Hey, everyone I'm starting this thread to di

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread sebb
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 14:01, Xuanwo wrote: > > > I think there is probably a requirement to store the reports in ASF svn > > This makes sense to me as well. I believe we can store the generated reports > in SVN. I doubt that SVN is specifically required. I wonder if they even need to be under ve

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread Xuanwo
> I think there is probably a requirement to store the reports in ASF svn This makes sense to me as well. I believe we can store the generated reports in SVN. One question that comes to mind is: where are our old reports? There seems to be a big gap between 2022 and 2025. On Mon, Feb 3, 2025,

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread PJ Fanning
I think there is probably a requirement to store the reports in ASF svn but the idea of automating some of the generation tasks is probably a good item to discuss. On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 14:16, Xuanwo wrote: > > Hey, everyone > > I'm starting this thread to discuss whether it is a good idea to mig

[DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

2025-02-03 Thread Xuanwo
Hey, everyone I'm starting this thread to discuss whether it is a good idea to migrate the incubator report workflow to a GitHub-based system. Our current workflow is Confluence-based and involves many manual tasks. I also find Confluence difficult to use, and several other IPMC members seem to