On 08/08/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The latest example is all the debate surrounding whether or not the
"glasgow" name is appropriate. Up until about a week or two ago, it
certainly was accepted practice (just look around), and now 'suddenly'
there's messiness. Its ok if opinions
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
+42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per
single thread on this list at the moment).
Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with "versioning" policy. Podlings
should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and t
A big +1. And I also really like the idea that the proposals contain
the version number they were written against.
-David
On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:34 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 8/8/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we
c
On 8/8/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we
could have a "released" version of all the things we want a project to
do and/or comply with (this is our website) and we could have an
"in progress" version of the same thing (t
> On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 23:24 -0700, Leo Simons wrote:
>>
>> It must be sooo frustrating for new projects coming in. They read the
>> websites, read the mail archives, talk to loads and loads of people,
>> and when they think they get it all right they send in a proposal. And
>> then, more often t
+42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per
single thread on this list at the moment).
Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with "versioning" policy. Podlings
should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and then
a more recent one on graduation (so even if som
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:17:25PM +0530, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> +1 for another list for proposal submissions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> for this to remain for the current purpose.
-1. Eww. Please not another list. Folks just need to exhibit common sense
towards proposals. -- justin
-
ABSOLUTELY +1! I also feel really terrible about our "unprofessionalism"
when it comes to handling proposals.
+1 for another list for proposal submissions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
for this to remain for the current purpose.
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 23:24 -0700, Leo Simons wrote:
>
> It must
It must be sooo frustrating for new projects coming in. They read the
websites, read the mail archives, talk to loads and loads of people,
and when they think they get it all right they send in a proposal. And
then, more often than not, someone somewhere within the ASF sees
"something" that is som
