A big +1. And I also really like the idea that the proposals contain
the version number they were written against.
-David
On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:34 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 8/8/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we
could have a "released" version of all the things we want a
project to
do and/or comply with (this is our website) and we could have an
"in progress" version of the same thing (this is what changes more
rapidly). And *new proposals should be evaluated against the
"released"
one*.
+1
This is one of my biggest concerns -- the rapidly changing
requirements.
This is easy enough to do as well. The released version (with a
release number) is on the public website and the "in progress" version
could be on the wiki. Proposals should include the version number
they were written against.
--
jaaron
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
