On 8/8/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we could have a "released" version of all the things we want a project to do and/or comply with (this is our website) and we could have an "in progress" version of the same thing (this is what changes more rapidly). And *new proposals should be evaluated against the "released" one*.
+1 This is one of my biggest concerns -- the rapidly changing requirements. This is easy enough to do as well. The released version (with a release number) is on the public website and the "in progress" version could be on the wiki. Proposals should include the version number they were written against. -- jaaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
