Thank you all for your feedback.
I cancel this vote and will initiate a new one for Release Candidate 3.
Best regards,
Bertil
> On 20 Nov 2024, at 13:14, Bertil Chapuis wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1 (incubating),
> release candid
Hi,
> Ok, I simply removed this content as it is not required:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/pull/905/commits/af6e40a9860c0b0ce3ea1f670cd180f5bd4f8ca7
Thanks, that looks good to me.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To uns
> In the NOTICE file, there is no need for the "product includes / copied files
> / derived files” sections. If you want to keep this content, put it in the
> README or similar.
Ok, I simply removed this content as it is not required:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/pull/905/commi
Hello Calvin,
> Yes, but that's something you have to do when releasing binary versions.
> I'm not sure if providing a link to indicate the license source in the
> LICENSE file would be acceptable. For example, with the MIT License: "The
> above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
This discussion might be clearer.[1]
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-323
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:18 PM Calvin Kirs wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 6:25 PM Bertil Chapuis wrote:
>
>> Hello Calvin,
>>
>> Are you referring to the following email? I struggled to find a refer
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 6:25 PM Bertil Chapuis wrote:
> Hello Calvin,
>
> Are you referring to the following email? I struggled to find a reference
> to Netty in the dev mailing-list, but this one related to Hadoop seems to
> be the most closely related.
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/h8bbvwm5
Hello Calvin,
Are you referring to the following email? I struggled to find a reference to
Netty in the dev mailing-list, but this one related to Hadoop seems to be the
most closely related.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/h8bbvwm5l9c5n9gzs4prhkrcmj9q5js1
As mentioned, I’ve observed different p
Hi,
In the NOTICE file, there is no need for the "product includes / copied files /
derived files” sections. If you want to keep this content, put it in the README
or similar.
Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene
Hello,
> Thanks for the improvements, but the NOTICE file still contains license
> information, as this can impact downstream projects. Please remove what is
> not needed from it, [1] should help.
I removed the licensing information. Would the following version fit the bill?
https://github.com
Hi Bertil,
In addition to what Justin mentioned, I brought up in the dev mailing list
that the binary release is missing the NOTICE section (at least we omitted
the NOTICE for Netty).
The LICENSE file is also missing and needs to be addressed in the next RC
version.
On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 10:40
Hi,
Thanks for the improvements, but the NOTICE file still contains license
information, as this can impact downstream projects. Please remove what is not
needed from it, [1] should help.
Moving the image to GitHub may not solve the issue. An ASF project can’t
include or depend on something yo
Hello Justin,
I believe I now have enough information to release a new candidate. I’m closing
this vote and will start a new one early next week.
Here is a summary of the corrections I made:
- Removed the unlicensed fuji.png file and fixed the related tests.
- Added a missing license header to s
Hi,
> The CopyWriter.java file is part of the Apache Baremaps project and does not
> require a mention in the LICENSE and NOTICE file.
Yes, it does, as it contains this:
* This code has been adapted from
* https://github.com/PgBulkInsert/PgBulkInsert";>PgBulkInsert
licensed under the MIT
HI,
> According to the documentation [1], what’s currently missing in our LICENSE
> file are pointers (“For details, see deps/flatgeobuf”). I suggest to modify
> the third party section as follow, so we have pointers for everything.
>
> THIRD PARTY LICENSES:
>
> Code and data produced outs
Hello Justing,
>>> - LICENSE is misisng info on [3][4]?
>>
>> I’m not sure to understand this point. I checked both file and they have a
>> license information in their header.
>
> They need to be mentioned in LICENSE, as that is where licencing info goes.
Ok, thanks a lot for the clarificatio
Hi,
>> - LICENSE is misisng info on [3][4]?
>
> I’m not sure to understand this point. I checked both file and they have a
> license information in their header.
They need to be mentioned in LICENSE, as that is where licencing info goes.
>> - NOTICE contains information on MIT/BSD license code
HI Bertil,
Apologies, that was indeed intended for another project. However you be clear
license information belongs in LICENSE, not NOTICE, see [1].
Justin
1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html
Hello Justin,
Was this email intended at another project?
Best,
Bertil
> On 22 Nov 2024, at 04:13, jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> -1 (binding) from jmclean (IPMC)
>
> in the main source release I checked:
> - incubating in artifact names
> - signatures and hashes are fine
> - D
Hello Justin,
Thank you for your thorough review.
> - LICENSE is misisng info on [3][4]?
I’m not sure to understand this point. I checked both file and they have a
license information in their header.
> - NOTICE contains information on MIT/BSD license code when it should not
Does this mean I
Hi,
-1 (binding) from jmclean (IPMC)
in the main source release I checked:
- incubating in artifact names
- signatures and hashes are fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- ASF files have headers
- Didn’t compile from source
And everything is fine t
Hi,
-1 (binding) form jmclean (IPMC)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is missing license information
- LICENSE is misisng info on [3][4]?
- NOTICE contains information on MIT/BSD license code when it should not
- How is this file is misisng a header [1]
- How is this
+1 (non binding)
On 2024/11/20 12:14:24 Bertil Chapuis wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1 (incubating),
release candidate 2. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastructure
components for creating, publishing, and operating online
Forwarding my vote from the dev@ vote:
+1 jhyde (IPMC member)
> On Nov 20, 2024, at 4:14 AM, Bertil Chapuis wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1 (incubating),
> release candidate 2. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastructu
Hello Everyone,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Baremaps 0.8.1 (incubating),
release candidate 2. Apache Baremaps is a toolkit and a set of infrastructure
components for creating, publishing, and operating online maps. This release
comes with exciting changes, including support for
24 matches
Mail list logo
