Hi, >> - LICENSE is misisng info on [3][4]? > > I’m not sure to understand this point. I checked both file and they have a > license information in their header.
They need to be mentioned in LICENSE, as that is where licencing info goes. >> - NOTICE contains information on MIT/BSD license code when it should not > > Does this mean I should remove all the notices related to MIT/BSD? For > instance, I thought the following notice would be helpful as it shows where > the relicensing discussion occurred. From my understanding a notice is some > sort of observation, notification, or warning. License Information should go in LICENSE, not NOTICE; see [1] on handling MIT/BSD license code. > Should the complete licences be placed in a specific file or directory? It can be placed in the LICENSE file, or you can have the LICENSE file provide a pointer to it in the artifact, e.g. some projects create a licenses directory and put all 3rd party licenses in that. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
