On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing:
>> >
>> > """
>> > src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib)
>> > src/kudu/util (s
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing:
> >
> > """
> > src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib)
> > src/kudu/util (some portions): 3-clause BSD license
> > src/kudu/util (HdrHistog
Hi,
> I haven't been following carefully, but isn't there a BSD header in these
> files? If so, couldn't your LICENSE refer people to the headers in those
> files?
You can and it's nice and useful to do so but it not legally required. All BSD
ask for is a full text of the license and the header
On 3/1/16, 5:22 PM, "Todd Lipcon" wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > I seem to recall reading some place or another that pointers
>> > to licenses in the forms of URLs or textual references are frowned
>>upon,
>> > because licenses may change over tim
Hi,
> OK. In the case that we've incorporated code, we could switch to doing:
>
> """
> src/kudu/gutil/valgrind.h: Hybrid BSD (half BSD, half zlib)
> src/kudu/util (some portions): 3-clause BSD license
> src/kudu/util (HdrHistogram-related classes): public domain
> src/kudu/util/{random-util.cc},
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I seem to recall reading some place or another that pointers
> > to licenses in the forms of URLs or textual references are frowned upon,
> > because licenses may change over time, or the links may break
>
> Correct. Also most licen
Hi,
> I seem to recall reading some place or another that pointers
> to licenses in the forms of URLs or textual references are frowned upon,
> because licenses may change over time, or the links may break
Correct. Also most licenses say you much include the full text of the license
in your dist
Hi Justin,
I'm working on making the changes you suggested below. A few follow-up
questions:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Hmm, I'm not seeing this -- got a line number? Line 614 in LICENSE.txt
> > says "StumbleUpon”.
>
> Sorry it was WebRTC line 360 and also
Voting period is now closed. It passes with:
3 binding +1s (Todd L, Michael S, Justin M)
0 binding -1s
0.7.0 RC3 will become 0.7.0, the project's first ASF release.
I'm also the RM for the next release, I'll make sure we address the
non-blocking issues identified in the VOTE thread.
Thanks to
Thanks, we'll check with legal before our next release (or just remove the file)
-Todd
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Right, we actually noticed this as well and got in touch with the ACM
>> to clarify the licensing. We already fixed it for the next release in
>
Hi,
> Right, we actually noticed this as well and got in touch with the ACM
> to clarify the licensing. We already fixed it for the next release in
> this commit:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kudu/commit/6991cd432d0be35743995b3ca7cb5eedc072e3cb
>
> Given it's not software so much as a te
Hi,
> Hmm, I'm not seeing this -- got a line number? Line 614 in LICENSE.txt
> says "StumbleUpon”.
Sorry it was WebRTC line 360 and also LevelDB line 315.
> Can you clarify what this means?
See [1] basically a pointer to the full test of the license in the source
release.
> Given it's not so
Hey Justin,
Thanks a lot for taking the time to check out the rc and vote. A
couple notes inline:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding). Nice work on the LICENSE.
>
> I checked:
> - signature and hashes correct
> - release name contain incubating
> - DISCLA
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> > Porting over my +1 from the podling vote. Not sure if it's binding in the
> > IPMC context if I already voted as PPMC.
>
> Traditionally such IPMC votes carry over. It's good (but
Hi,
+1 (binding). Nice work on the LICENSE.
I checked:
- signature and hashes correct
- release name contain incubating
- DISCLAIMER exits
- LICENSE file has some minor issues (see below)
- NOTICE good
- unable to compile on OS X (but notes say it only has experiment support)
Minor issues LICENS
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Porting over my +1 from the podling vote. Not sure if it's binding in the
> IPMC context if I already voted as PPMC.
Traditionally such IPMC votes carry over. It's good (but not a
requirement) for the release manager to list the Mentor/IPMC v
Porting over my +1 from the podling vote. Not sure if it's binding in the
IPMC context if I already voted as PPMC.
Todd
On Feb 22, 2016 7:10 AM, "Jean-Daniel Cryans" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0's RC3 passed and
> I'm now submitting this to the IPMC.
>
Hi,
The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.0's RC3 passed and
I'm now submitting this to the IPMC.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kudu-dev/201602.mbox/%3CCAGpTDNepARg8zW%2BXdoorQV48KSfkemi5HLuzgeeJarMTXcNF%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Result:
http://mai
18 matches
Mail list logo
