+1 (binding)
Verified hashes and sigs
Reviewed DISCLAIMER, README.md, and LICENSE
Cheers. -- justin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Ed Espino wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC (IPMC),
>
> The Apache HAWQ community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (so
On Saturday, November 14, 2015, Rich Bowen wrote:
> No. I can use whatever criteria I like to justify my vote on a podlings
> graduation, if it's in line with asf philosophy. This document is, and
> accurately reflects the criteria I use when voting on a graduation. That
> is, the document refle
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...that brought us to our current, much less forceful, treatment
> of the maturity model. Which is what I (and a few others including
> it seems yourself) have been advocating on *this* thread.
I took the tenor of the conversation as headi
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Correct. It is a tool, but not a requirement (at least not yet).
> And since I repeatedly suggested this tool on this thread let me explain why.
And, this is the root of my concern expressed in the other general@
thread: I fear that this
I will just note that I disagree with adding bureaucracy like this.
We already require podlings to submit reports as frequently as
monthly. (Geode somehow had to report monthly for no discernible
reason.)
This further adds to the burden on being a mentor - probably to
something like being a teach
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> First off: Can we *please* focus on the revised proposal and not get
> into a loop about the original email? I'll change the topic if that helps.
>
> The revised edition, as partly suggested by Sam (and echoed by Bertrand)
> was:
>
> - Binding
ll
> require integration with Docker support.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Lirong Jian
> * Hubert Huan Zhang
> * Radar Da Lei
> * Ivan Yanqing Weng
> * Zhanwei Wang
> * Yi Jin
> * Lili Ma
> * Jiali Yao
> * Zhenglin Tao
> * Ruilong Huo
&
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> I would much prefer a smaller list of initial committers who have been
>> identified as having experience or a solid potential to be ASF
>> committers, and let others be elected based on merit as the project
>> progresses.
>
> I would agr
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to start a discussion on accepting HAWQ
> into ASF Incubator. The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HAWQProposal
> and is also attached to the end of this email.
If HAWQ desires more m
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> While I agree that this is a general issue that should be discussed, an
> example might help. This discussion started because the Geode PMC is
> publishing a docker artifact from their nightly builds and then pointing
> the general public to m
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
> wrote:
>> There is nothing preventing "clearly identifiable non-release artifacts
>> available to the general public". Many projects make automated nightly
>> builds availab
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> It is vexed because when pronounced by many people, it sounds almost
> identical to how those same people would pronounce Mesos.
>
> That can lead to confusion.
As there has been no trademark confusion raised, I would strongly
prefer that we p
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Based on the earlier discussion in thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE
> to accept Mysos, an Apache Mesos framework for running MySQL instances, as
> a new Apache Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.05.2015 00:44, Justin Mclean wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> +0 (binding) from me until these 2 issues are resolved. Of course other IPMC
>> members may vote differently.
>>
>> Several bundled files have GPL license headers e.g.
>> ./ipc/shmem/con
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Stack wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread [1], I would like to call a
> VOTE to accept Trafodion as a new Apache Incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this
> mail.
>
> The VOTE is open for at
;
> === Mailing lists ===
> * priv...@geode.incubator.apache.org (moderated subscriptions)
> * comm...@geode.incubator.apache.org
> * d...@geode.incubator.apache.org
> * iss...@geode.incubator.apache.org
> * u...@geode.incubator.apache.org
>
> === Git Repository ===
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I hate to be a pissant, but why does it follow that new code has to be
> implemented in private?
>
> Building community can start with the first semi-colon. It doesn't have to
> wait until the code is frozen.
We were having this conversation
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> If I understand the response below correctly you misspoke when you said there
> were "export" issues. That in fact there is no related export restriction,
> it's actually about the licensing issue. If that's the case then the
>> On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>
>> I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In
To be clear, there were conversations with Jim (as VP Legal) prior to
this submission. The ASF wouldn't accept the software grant until the
Incubator approved the proposal. Piv
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
> someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
> votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
> for votes from Incubator PMC memb
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Please VOTE on the below resolution for promoting OODT to an Apache TLP and
> graduating from the Incubator. The VOTE is open for 72 hrs.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept OODT's graduation from the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't ac
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> The release doesn't need to be tagged?
It's...uh...version controlled. So, it's still easy to create a tag:
svn cp
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/oodt/branches/0.1-incubat...@1029464
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 5:29 PM, david woollard wrote:
> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 0.1-incubating
Just did a visual comparison (diff -ru) between RC1 and RC4. Changes look fine.
+1 for release.
Thanks. -- justin
---
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> For reference:
>
> * Subversion created its dev list in April 2000.
> * The user list was created in July 2003. 238 messages were posted that month.
>
> As you can see, we waited a very long time before sending users to
> their own list. Our dev
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> If the name is going to change (which sounds like a good idea) I'd
> suggest going for something more abstract, to which you can give
> meaning: Apache Connecto, or some such.
+1. -- justin
-
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
+1. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsu
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Agreed, but I will claim that my proposal has worked successfully for httpd,
> so it's not coming out of the clear blue sky. Perhaps you're onto something,
> that diversifying the podling incubation process so we can pick "the right
> fit"
>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Gav... wrote:
> have something to say about it. I'm surprised no-one has mentioned about the
> Incubator PMC Chair
> up until now (actually I'm not, and I bet that no one steps up to agree with
> me here, I expect
> to be alone in my opinion.)
I agree with you.
I
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> You know when to vote and *how* to vote. I see no reason to deny your vote.
Of course. It's always seemed awkward if you can't contribute
technically to suddenly have a binding vote. I'm sure if I *wanted*
to learn how to build something wit
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> So basically you are moving more towards Joe's proposal, that the PPMC would
> have the binding VOTEs in e.g., new committers/PMC members, and on releases?
> Of course, with the caveats below, as you mention, i.e., the observers c
[ CCing gene...@incubator as I think I can now place my finger a bit
as to why I'm discomforted with Greg's proposal in the OODT context ;
and more importantly, another potential experiment at the end; leaving
context in for those on gene...@incubator ]
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Mattmann, C
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I've already decided that I'm going to have to recruit a number of key
> mentors to help me protect the project during incubation.
Historically, I think there are two classes of podlings:
- one which has a self-governing community and just n
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
>> I suspect the OODT guys might want to try this (it has four ASF
>> Members as Mentors who could comprise the PMC). Subversion would have
>> done this, based on my own thoughts/experiences and knowledge of what
>> the
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> What happened?
It's all in the archives, but a quick recap.
For Subversion, an Incubator PMC member who was never involved in the
SVN community jumped in the middle of a committer vote to vote -1.
Greg wrote a cranky email telling him to
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Where are you seeing this "over-reach" problem to which you refer? I have
> heard of a few isolated incidents, and those can be addressed. But by far
> and way, the biggest complaint is LACK of involvement, e.g.,
...
> And most cases of
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Perhaps that's true for the projects you work on, but it certainly
> isn't true of Thrift, where mentorship has been a revolving door
> for years.
True. I've never been a big fan of requiring 3 mentors - as I think
certain personalities can
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> And if the Mentors aren't being active, voting, etc., then *that* is what
> needs to be addressed.
As I've repeatedly stated before (here and elsewhere), in the podlings
I've been recently involved with, having three mentors isn't the
issu
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
>> The first idea should be fairly straightforward: that for
>> the projects I participate in (so far thrift and sis), that
>> the IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making process
>> for voting in new committers: b
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> It is *very* true that Infra, Legal, and (all?) ASF PMCs will be
> clients/users of the tool. But are they interested in its development?
If it goes under infra (as some are pushing for), then Joe gets to
rewrite it in Perl. Hey, that's not a
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> please find below our proposal for Zeta Components. The proposal is also
> available in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
Sorry that
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> [X] +1 to recommend UIMA's graduation
Good luck! -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h..
On Thursday, February 11, 2010, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for
> Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been
> handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential
> showstoppers, and
Hi Noel,
This note is largely for you: it's been on my plate for a while to let
you know that the Board would like to see any roster changes in the
Incubator PMC included in the monthly Board reports.
Thanks!
Justin on behalf of the Apache Board
--
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> I ask this as I was involved in PHP development 5 years back and am never
> aware of PHP being part of ASF.
PHP was a "sister project" for a long while - after we moved to the
Apache License v.2, the PHP Group decided that it was best
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> For most projects they just put a URL in the jira, and Joe just imports it.
So, is this just a failure of the documentation to reflect what is
actually done?
If so, I'm happy to update the documentation. -- justin
---
For OODT, we think we want to import the prior history of the project
into the podling via a Subversion dump file. However, in:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
it says:
---
In either case, the code to be imported should be attached to a JIRA
and then impor
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> It is possible to run an incubator.staging.apache.org, syncing off a
> branch, and the live site off trunk, or vice versa.
>
> (possible, but I wouldn't recommend it, merging html changes like that
> is pretty meh)
I think we pretty much have
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:02 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Does 'svnpubsub' also dispense with the hourly rsync step
> to truly be live.
> i.e. http://apache.org/dev/project-site.html
> find-in-page: rsync
Yes.
> Is there a description of svnpubsub?
Other than:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Peter wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have 2 projects, both alpha and written in C++, that I am considering
> making open source. I would like to know whether you are interested in
> hosting them as projects and what support you can give me. You can see the
> screenshots h
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, using svnpubsub will only remove the
> need for the second part (checkout on p.a.o), but not the first part
> (Anakia). People will still need to run Anakia to generate the HTML
> pages from the XML sources, but w
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> +1 from me on this - I'd see the OODT changes more quickly, right?
Indeed! Your note re: OODT is what triggered me to send this email.
=P -- justin
-
To unsubs
Hi general@,
I'd like to suggest switching incubator.apache.org over to svnpubsub.
(We can do so by filing a JIRA like INFRA-2349:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2349)
This would mean that any commits made to the site-publish tree would
automatically be deployed to the site. No more
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Thanks Justin!
>
> I went ahead and updated the incubator site oodt.xml document in
> incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/oodt.xml with the February 2010
> report based off the wiki:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=90
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A draft OODT report has been submitted to the Incubator wiki.
> Comments/updates from mentors and from the OODT/incubator community are
> welcome.
Cool - thanks! I made some minor tweaks, so please review. Namely,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Thanks, Justin. I appreciate the work that you just committed. Looked
> reasonable to me. I hope that others have also reviewed it.
I certainly don't intend for any of my changes to alter policy - just
make some wording clearer to n00b
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
> to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
>
> [ ] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator
> [ ] -1 - Do not accept OODT into the
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> Per the previous proposal that was sent to gene...@incubator, I'd like
> to now call a vote for accepting OODT into the Incubator.
>
> [X] +1 - Accept OODT into the Incubator
> [ ] -1 - Do not accept OODT into the
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Missing:
>
> Subversion
Hmm. Something went wrong with the automated notifier as this ball
got dropped, I guess. Subversion should have something submitted by
this evening. -- justin
-
| NASA Jet Propulsion
Laboratory | no
David Woollard | woollard at jpl dot nasa dot gov | NASA Jet
Propulsion Laboratory | yes
Brian Foster | bfoster at jpl dot nasa dot gov | NASA Jet Propulsion
Laboratory | no
Sean McCleese | smcclees at jpl dot nasa dot gov | NASA Jet Propulsion
Laboratory | no
Spo
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 01/06/2010 10:56 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> Count me in as a mentor for this excellent proposal.
>
> If you still need more mentors count on me too.
Thanks - I've added you and Ian to the proposal. (Ross already added
himself on th
oster | bfoster at jpl dot nasa dot gov | NASA Jet Propulsion
Laboratory | no
Sean McCleese | smcclees at jpl dot nasa dot gov | NASA Jet Propulsion
Laboratory | no
Sponsors
Champion
* Justin Erenkrantz (jerenkrantz at apache dot org)
Nominated Mentors
* Justin Erenkrantz (jerenkrantz at
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Christopher Brind wrote:
> I can understand why Subversion should be made a top level project quickly,
> but I personally believe the namespace change is a reasonable request in
> order to graduate for all the same reasons that convinced me Pivot should
> change it
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Is there any way to make RAT slightly smarter so that it doesn't require
> license headers in README files and such?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/
*duck*
> Does policy dictate these
> files must have license head
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> There is a more practical reason for this. If I have a need to debug a
> package or get further documentation, the package name gives me a pointer as
> to where to look. If tigris.org disappeared users would get very confused.
>
> IMO, whethe
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I've participated in both styles of development. RTC is *stifling*. I
> would never want to see that in any Apache community for its routine
> development (branch releases are another matter).
>
> My opinion is that it is very unfortunate that C
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Igor Burilo wrote:
> isn’t guaranteed (you and Michael Pilato are sceptic regarding Serf). Nobody
Hang on - let's be clear here: ra_serf passes *all* of the Subversion
regression tests just fine and has done so for several years now. (An
ra_serf slave is part of
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> OTOH, podlings that don't have 3 active mentors can't get 3 binding
> votes internally, so IPMC members have to jump in sometimes. Thanks to
> those of us who do!
I view the proposal accepting the projects with the listed mentors as
del
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> Also, to be clear, as an IPMC member I spend quite a bit of time with
> projects where I am not a mentor, casting (binding) votes on things
> like their releases. I will continue to do that, inline with procedure
> and policy and common sense. I'
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>> To be clear, it's on the mentors to decide what is applicable and
>> necessary for graduation - not the IPMC as a whole.
>
> Nope... The wh
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> The Apache Incubator is about EDUCATION. It is about TEACHING podlings
> how to work here at Apache.
...
> The Incubator PMC is here to TEACH podlings. Stop and think before
> attempting to apply "rules and procedures".
+1.
The Incubation proce
umber of ASF Members amongst
> its committers.
>
> Sponsors
> * Champion: Greg Stein
> * Nominated Mentors: Justin Erenkrantz, Greg Stein, Sander Striker, Daniel
> Rall
+1 for acceptance.
w...0...0...t. =) -- justin
-
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [X] +1 Accept Libcloud for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Libcloud incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Libcloud for incubation
>
> Vote Closes 72 hours from now.
Good luck! -- justin
--
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> The Commons Incubator would act as a "perpetual podling" or "mini-Incubator"
> overseeing the influx of components to be adopted into Apache Commons.
-1 (vote, not veto).
If Commons PMC wants to import code, then it can file IP clearances.
If
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Garrett Rooney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
> list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
> that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
> long incubati
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The proposal is here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StonehengeProposal
>
> And also included at the end:
>
> Please vote +1 to accept, or -1 with reasons to not accept as a podling.
+1. -- justin
-
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the process as documented at
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
> the correct one to follow for this?
Yup. -- justin
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 9:45 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Justin,
>
> we would be glad to welcome you as a mentor for catacomb incubation process!
> Your idea to fold catacomb into the HTTP
> Server Project is realy nice, maybe later in the incubation process we could
> start a discuss
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:55 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a proposal to enter the incubator.
>
> See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CatacombProposal for the most
> up-to-date version.
Nifty!
> As Champion we have Gianugo Rabellino from the
> ASF.
>
> We look forward to comments a
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about we include the signatures in the source distros? That way
> if you trust your source, then you can trust the dependencies it
> downloads.
Eww. That'd be a giant gaping security hole. -- justin
---
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just so everyone understands this in context, the objection above is moot
> because...
No, it's not. Anything that creates an impetus for a podling to get
out of the Incubator is goodness. Too many podlings view t
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> I believe that allowing incubating releases to be treated as full Apache
>> releases diminishes the Apache brand and makes incubation disclaimers moot.
>>
>> With Maven, it is too
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't see what the problem is here, there are two named
> committers in the proposal. Whatever the interests of the companies
> they work for, Tashi will have to create a healthy community to
> graduate and I don
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Huh? The only difference I know of is the possible presence
> of external dependencies on LGPL code, which is not a legal
> question at all. All legal issues are satisfied before we
> even let the code be imported, let a
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, my question is, if Apache is about "Community over code", why are we
> putting up barriers to getting the code if that is also creating barriers to
> building the community?
Apache isn't about 'community over code'. The
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd be very surprised if it does close the issue :)...
>
> IMHO voting about where to put incubator Maven artifacts is a majority
> vote
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you see infra checking that the account requests that they
> receive have been voted on according to this procedure?
The account reqs from the PPMC should CC Incubator PMC. So, the
responsibility is on the Inc
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick question, haven't thought thru, but raising it here...Does it make
> sense to align voting in a new committer with
> "Voting in a new PPMC member"? (on the same page)?
Makes sense to me. The policy for IPMC oversi
Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
---
Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the
vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the
podling's private li
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AIUI using the top level .htaccess is better for performance so that's
> what i recommend (but hopefully someone will jump in and correct me if
+1.
(Not having .htaccess at all is actually best; but that requir
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin
>
> Is the prefereed method of handling these, moving them to
> archive.a.o/incubator.a.o/($podling)/ ?? Or is there an alternate location?
If the projects have indeed graduated, and they already have
$podling.a
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on this, I would like to keep things as they are, unless there is a
> new conclusion about where things like documentation should go.
Nah - that's fine. The issue is the TLPs that have graduated and left
a bunch
On Feb 18, 2008 10:48 AM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> outright FUD? Sorry but I don't think there is Fear, Uncertainty or
> Doubt in this thread. There are several testimonies of good experiences
I feel there has been lots of FUD and if you don't realize that, then
I recommend takin
On Feb 18, 2008 1:01 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the last time i tried SVK, changes would be needed to SVK before it
> could work with a repository as big as apache
FWIW, the partial svnsync changes that SVK would need are present in
1.5. I don't know if the SVK communi
On Feb 17, 2008 3:34 PM, Santiago Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also: you keep a long term branch for doing some refactoring, and you
> fix small bugs both in HEAD and in a release branch, merging and
> backporting/forwardporting as you go. Again, something like git makes
> the work simpler and
On Feb 17, 2008 7:51 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But visibility of the content and process very much IS part of "the Apache
> Way."
>
> Most of the use cases mentioned so far for git, including some where people
> are using it on top of SVN with ASF projects, run counter to A
On Dec 7, 2007 1:36 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK, Synapse has graduated on Jan 2, 2007 9:43 AM to a sub project of the
> WS TLP. Therefore the resolution doesn't involve the incubator anymore.
> I think the confusion comes from the tuscany graduation vote a couple of
> we
On Dec 6, 2007 7:09 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Apache Synapse project (part of the Web Services PMC) and the Web
> Services PMC would respectfully like to propose the following resolution for
> review by the Board at the December meeting.
> Both communities have voted to pr
On Nov 21, 2007 5:03 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
> I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
> issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
>
> [ ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to set up
On Oct 22, 2007 12:13 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation
Try try try again. =)
Best of luck to ya'll. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addition
On 10/17/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (this is a good example of something that i've been thinking about
> raising for a little while. it arises from some of the analysis i've
> been doing for RAT.)
>
> this doesn't seem to actually track a software grant but a donation
>
1 - 100 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
